Politics
WHY NIGERIANS MUST RALLY BEHIND THE AFRICAN DEMOCRATIC CONGRESS (ADC) TO RESCUE NIGERIA IN 2027
From Lateef Taiwo
Human rights activist, Barrister Hamza Nuhu Dantani, has called on Nigerians to rally behind the African Democratic Congress to , rescue Nigeria in ,2027.
In a statement made available to newsmen , on Thursday, In Abuja , the Abuja based Constitutional lawyer said that
“Every nation has a time when its people must decide whether to live on their knees or rise on their feet. For Nigeria, that time is now.”
‘We can no longer afford to stand and watch while our future is auctioned off by a government that has made pain a permanent feature of our daily existence. Under the watch of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu and the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC),'”
‘,According to erudite lawyer “Nigeria is bleeding from every area—economically, politically, socially, and morally. If Nigerians don’t kill APC at the ballot in 2027, APC may very well finish what it has started: the total collapse of the Nigerian state.”
‘As a lawyer and human rights activist, I have always believed in the rule of law, democratic ideals, and the power of the people to effect change”
“Today, I write not just as an advocate for justice but as a concerned Nigerian whose conscience can no longer stay silent in the face of authoritarianism disguised as democracy”
Hamza described the Tinubu as tyrannical and anti democratic with it’s attendance assault on democratic institutions, saying that
“President Tinubu has, in just over two years in office, launched one of the most aggressive attacks on our democratic structures since the return to civilian rule in 1999. Nothing is sacred to him.”
“His interference in the traditional Emirate system in Kano stands as a dark testament to his blatant disregard for the federal structure of Nigeria and the autonomy of states. By using federal might to back the dethroned Ado Bayero against the duly reinstated Emir, His Royal Highness Sanusi Lamido Sanusi, whose appointment was in line with the statutory powers of the Kano State Governor, “
‘”Tinubu, has ignited chaos, tension, and an avoidable political crisis in the ancient city. This brazen act undermines the very principle of democracy and federalism.”
“Equally disturbing is his extension of the tenure of the Inspector General of Police, Kayode Egbetokun. This move was not borne out of merit or national interest but sheer political expediency—to protect his power base for the 2027 general elections. This sets a dangerous precedent and endangers the operational integrity of our police force, reducing it to a tool of political manipulation”
“More egregiously, Tinubu has violated our fundamental right, the Constitution, by suspending the democratically elected Governor of Rivers State and dissolving the State House of Assembly. These actions are not just unconstitutional—they are dictatorial. The president swore an oath to protect and uphold the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, but he has consistently done the opposite.”
“Should we talk about the emasculation of the National Assembly, so much so that they are willing to do the bidding of Tinubu no matter what the president asks? Never at any point in our history has our legislature, an institution saddled with safeguarding our democracy and protecting Nigerians from executive recklessness, been reduced to a toothless bulldog”
.
,’Our lawmakers have been degraded to lickspittles and praise singers, chorusing “on your mandate we shall stand” while neglecting their constitutional duty and allowing the president to get away with murder!”
“President Tinubu’s leadership style resembles a gangster’s grip on power rather than the democratic finesse expected of a president. Opposition parties are being infiltrated, and opposition politicians are being coerced, threatened, and blackmailed into joining the APC. The party no longer wins people over with ideas—it uses fear and force. “
“This is not democracy. This is the death of political plurality and a direct assault on the rights of Nigerians to choose their leaders freely.”
“,At a time when Nigerians are grappling with the worst inflation in our history, rising insecurity, mass unemployment, widespread poverty, and endemic corruption, Tinubu is obsessed with politicking. He is more concerned with consolidating power than governing responsibly. The streets are filled with hungry citizens, our youth are hopeless, the middle class is vanishing, and yet the president remains deaf to the cries of the people.’
The human rights however, expressed optimism that the newly registered opposition party ADC , has come to rescue Nigerian from the clutches
“But all hope is not lost. The winds of change are beginning to gather. A new coalition of opposition forces has adopted the African Democratic Congress (ADC) as a vehicle to rescue Nigeria from the abyss. Among the principal voices of this coalition is former Vice President Atiku Abubakar—a cosmopolitan elder statesman who has consistently shown his love for Nigeria across regional and religious lines. Atiku’s statesmanship, inclusiveness, and vision for a united, prosperous Nigeria stand in sharp contrast to the divisive and authoritarian tendencies of the current administration. “
“The mission of the ADC is to rescue our country and save our hard-won democracy. This national political opposition goes beyond gaining political power. It is a concerted effort to rebuild the crumbling pillars of Nigeria’s democracy.”
“I too, find hope in this movement. As a human rights advocate, some may ask why I would support or join a political party. The answer is simple: advocacy for justice does not preclude political participation. The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria guarantees me the right to freedom of association and political participation. My activism only strengthens my resolve to support a political platform that genuinely seeks to serve the people.
There is a high possibility that I will join and support the ADC and the emerging coalition in the 2027 elections—not because I seek power, but because I seek justice, equity, and a better life for every Nigerian”
Barrister Hamza in clarion call urged to rise above tribe, religion, and region. We must see beyond Hausa-Fulani, Igbo, Yoruba, or other ethnic labels saying Hunger has no tribe. Insecurity does not ask for your religion. Poverty does not care about your region.
“We must act, vote wisely, organize, mobilize, and educate our communities about what is at stake. 2027 is not just another election but a referendum on whether Nigeria will survive or sink deeper into darkness. Let us choose unity over division, justice over tyranny, and hope over despair. The time to act is now. Nigeria must be rescued, and it starts with unseating the APC.”
An independent investigation by Nigerian Concord Newspaper has found no evidence linking a former Minister of Justice and Attorney General of the Federation, Chief Michael Kaase Aondoakaa, SAN, to the Utan Bran compensation case or other alleged scandals at the Federal Ministry of Justice.
The investigation, conducted at the Federal Ministry of Justice, followed reports in sections of the media alleging misconduct by the former chief law officer of the federation.
Documents obtained through the Freedom of Information Act indicate that Chief Aondoakaa was not involved in the legal firms that handled the Utan Bran compensation matter. Findings further show that the judgement debt related to the case was reportedly paid in 2006 under the tenure of a former Attorney General of the Federation, Chief Bayo Ojo, SAN, during the administration of former President Olusegun Obasanjo.
Multiple officials at the Federal Ministry of Justice, who spoke on condition of anonymity, described Chief Aondoakaa’s tenure as one marked by adherence to the rule of law. The sources said court orders were generally complied with during his time in office.
They also questioned claims portraying the former Attorney General as emblematic of alleged institutional failings within the legal system, stating that no specific instance had been cited in which he abused public office or undermined court judgements.
Regarding reports suggesting that Chief Aondoakaa interfered with court processes during the post-election period of the 2007 National Assembly elections, sources within the ministry said available records do not support claims that he acted to obstruct court orders or delay the swearing-in of elected officials.
On questions surrounding eligibility to hold public office, legal practitioners pointed to established Supreme Court jurisprudence, which holds that concurrent judgements carry equal legal weight with lead judgements. A concurring opinion by Justice Mary Odili, JSC, was cited as stating that the issue of disqualification from public office did not arise in the matter concerning Aondoakaa.
The case is reportedly the subject of further judicial proceedings, following claims that earlier judgements were obtained through misrepresentation. The matter remains pending before the courts.
Sources also said documents generated during the administration of former President Muhammadu Buhari, and signed by senior officials of the Ministry of Justice, support the position that Chief Aondoakaa was not implicated in the Utan Bran case. Nigerian Concord Newspaper said it would publish the documents after concluding its investigation.
Further findings indicate that the former Attorney General was not linked to major cases such as the Halliburton scandal, the OPL 245 (Malabu) oil deal, or the recovery of Abacha-era assets.
Supporters of Aondoakaa also note that he was cleared by his party to participate in the 2023 governorship primary election, arguing that this further demonstrates that no court order barred him from holding public office.
Legal experts reaffirm that qualifications and disqualifications for elective office are constitutionally defined, citing the Supreme Court’s decision in Attorney-General of Abia State v. Attorney-General of the Federation, which established that constitutional provisions on eligibility cannot be expanded or restricted by implication.
An independent investigation by Nigerian Concord Newspaper has found no evidence linking a former Minister of Justice and Attorney General of the Federation, Chief Michael Kaase Aondoakaa, SAN, to the Utan Bran compensation case or other alleged scandals at the Federal Ministry of Justice.
The investigation, conducted at the Federal Ministry of Justice, followed reports in sections of the media alleging misconduct by the former chief law officer of the federation.
Documents obtained through the Freedom of Information Act indicate that Chief Aondoakaa was not involved in the legal firms that handled the Utan Bran compensation matter. Findings further show that the judgement debt related to the case was reportedly paid in 2006 under the tenure of a former Attorney General of the Federation, Chief Bayo Ojo, SAN, during the administration of former President Olusegun Obasanjo.
Multiple officials at the Federal Ministry of Justice, who spoke on condition of anonymity, described Chief Aondoakaa’s tenure as one marked by adherence to the rule of law. The sources said court orders were generally complied with during his time in office.
They also questioned claims portraying the former Attorney General as emblematic of alleged institutional failings within the legal system, stating that no specific instance had been cited in which he abused public office or undermined court judgements.
Regarding reports suggesting that Chief Aondoakaa interfered with court processes during the post-election period of the 2007 National Assembly elections, sources within the ministry said available records do not support claims that he acted to obstruct court orders or delay the swearing-in of elected officials.
On questions surrounding eligibility to hold public office, legal practitioners pointed to established Supreme Court jurisprudence, which holds that concurrent judgements carry equal legal weight with lead judgements. A concurring opinion by Justice Mary Odili, JSC, was cited as stating that the issue of disqualification from public office did not arise in the matter concerning Aondoakaa.
The case is reportedly the subject of further judicial proceedings, following claims that earlier judgements were obtained through misrepresentation. The matter remains pending before the courts.
Sources also said documents generated during the administration of former President Muhammadu Buhari, and signed by senior officials of the Ministry of Justice, support the position that Chief Aondoakaa was not implicated in the Utan Bran case. Nigerian Concord Newspaper said it would publish the documents after concluding its investigation.
Further findings indicate that the former Attorney General was not linked to major cases such as the Halliburton scandal, the OPL 245 (Malabu) oil deal, or the recovery of Abacha-era assets.
Supporters of Aondoakaa also note that he was cleared by his party to participate in the 2023 governorship primary election, arguing that this further demonstrates that no court order barred him from holding public office.
Legal experts reaffirm that qualifications and disqualifications for elective office are constitutionally defined, citing the Supreme Court’s decision in Attorney-General of Abia State v. Attorney-General of the Federation, which established that constitutional provisions on eligibility cannot be expanded or restricted by implication.
An independent investigation by Nigerian Concord Newspaper has found no evidence linking a former Minister of Justice and Attorney General of the Federation, Chief Michael Kaase Aondoakaa, SAN, to the Utan Bran compensation case or other alleged scandals at the Federal Ministry of Justice.
The investigation, conducted at the Federal Ministry of Justice, followed reports in sections of the media alleging misconduct by the former chief law officer of the federation.
Documents obtained through the Freedom of Information Act indicate that Chief Aondoakaa was not involved in the legal firms that handled the Utan Bran compensation matter. Findings further show that the judgement debt related to the case was reportedly paid in 2006 under the tenure of a former Attorney General of the Federation, Chief Bayo Ojo, SAN, during the administration of former President Olusegun Obasanjo.
Multiple officials at the Federal Ministry of Justice, who spoke on condition of anonymity, described Chief Aondoakaa’s tenure as one marked by adherence to the rule of law. The sources said court orders were generally complied with during his time in office.
They also questioned claims portraying the former Attorney General as emblematic of alleged institutional failings within the legal system, stating that no specific instance had been cited in which he abused public office or undermined court judgements.
Regarding reports suggesting that Chief Aondoakaa interfered with court processes during the post-election period of the 2007 National Assembly elections, sources within the ministry said available records do not support claims that he acted to obstruct court orders or delay the swearing-in of elected officials.
On questions surrounding eligibility to hold public office, legal practitioners pointed to established Supreme Court jurisprudence, which holds that concurrent judgements carry equal legal weight with lead judgements. A concurring opinion by Justice Mary Odili, JSC, was cited as stating that the issue of disqualification from public office did not arise in the matter concerning Aondoakaa.
The case is reportedly the subject of further judicial proceedings, following claims that earlier judgements were obtained through misrepresentation. The matter remains pending before the courts.
Sources also said documents generated during the administration of former President Muhammadu Buhari, and signed by senior officials of the Ministry of Justice, support the position that Chief Aondoakaa was not implicated in the Utan Bran case. Nigerian Concord Newspaper said it would publish the documents after concluding its investigation.
Further findings indicate that the former Attorney General was not linked to major cases such as the Halliburton scandal, the OPL 245 (Malabu) oil deal, or the recovery of Abacha-era assets.
Supporters of Aondoakaa also note that he was cleared by his party to participate in the 2023 governorship primary election, arguing that this further demonstrates that no court order barred him from holding public office.
Legal experts reaffirm that qualifications and disqualifications for elective office are constitutionally defined, citing the Supreme Court’s decision in Attorney-General of Abia State v. Attorney-General of the Federation, which established that constitutional provisions on eligibility cannot be expanded or restricted by implication.
Audi: Trajectory of Success and Changing the Narrative
We’ve Known Each Other Since the 90s; I’m Qualified to Call Him a Scumbag – El-Rufai
Electronic Transmission: This Is Just a Warning Protest, We’ll Wait Till Tomorrow – Isaac Fayose
-
Uncategorized5 years agoFG, states urged to harness flooding for ranching, others with technology – Agbaje
-
Headlines10 years agoBreaking: EFCC seals Borno House of Assembly, as Hon members take to their heels
-
News12 years agoNigeria Security Operatives Stage Manhunt For Homosexual Perpetrator
-
News9 years agoHow 21-year-old Girl fled community over accusation of lesbianism
-
News10 years agoYobe Gov Moves Against Deputy
-
Opinion7 years ago7 signs she has friend zoned you
-
Technology4 years ago
Online job placement company headhunts women
-
Headlines10 years agoBorno Dep Gov Abducts Another Church Leader