Uncategorized
Buhari’s letter: Creating a Constitutional crisis where there is none
By: Faeren Kuanum Terrence
The wordings of the letter conveying President Muhammadu Buhari’s decision to travel to the Uk for medical treatment has sparked a controversy.
From fears that the president may sneak out of the country without informing the National Assembly, the emanating issue after the president has observed all the processes for him to proceed on the medical vacation including transmitting a letter to the National Assembly as well as informing the citizenry has transmuted into a hullabaloo on the literal meaning of a certain phrase in the letter.
The angst has to do with the aspect of the letter which says the vice president will coordinate the activities of the government while the president is away.
And for this, all manners of interpretations have emerged to the extent that some have called on the president to resign saying he has by that comment breached the Nigerian Constitution and (you won’t believe this) annulled the office of the vice president.
Ebun-Olu Adegboruwa, a lawyer, even suggested that the use of the phrase constitutes immense damage to the Constitution and requires a no less drastic measure as commencing impeachment proceedings against the president for the infraction to be addressed.
He says this is because the function of a coordinator of government activities does not equal that of an acting president in that the former is a person of equal status with others, do cannot make appointments or sack anybody while the President is away, cannot discipline any erring minister, is limited in policy decisions, and “has no power of control over the ‘Cabal’ to whom the president has handed over power, albeit illegally.”
“In all, he says, “the National Assembly should commence impeachment proceedings against the President for gross misconduct.”
But the lawyer, to paraphrase a Bible passage, can be said to be exhibiting zeal without adequate knowledge on the subject matter.
A careful and disinterested look at the letter would reveal both the zeal and lack of depth to the interpretation given.
This is what the letter says, ” In compliance with Section 145 (1) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) I wish to inform the Distinguished Senate that I will be away for a scheduled medical follow-up with my doctors in London. The length of my stay will be determined by the doctor’s advice. While I am away, the Vice President will coordinate the activities of the Government.”
We can see clearly that even from the opening phrase of the letter, the President makes no pretense about his resolve to abide by Constitutional provisions and had even made the point that his actions are guided strictly by that provision.
If the president had intended to be dubious, nebulous or evasive as is being insinuated in the message he intended to convey, he would have known better than to make the Constitution his guide and would have completely left out constitutional provisions in the letter since he is not in any way compelled to do so.
It is amazing how a clear matter-of – fact case of respect for the rule of law is now being twisted to look otherwise just to score a political point.
Sections 145 which the president cited states thus: ‘Whenever the President is proceeding on vacation or is otherwise unable to discharge the functions of his office, he shall transmit a written declaration to the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives to that effect, and until he transmits to them a written declaration to the contrary, the Vice President SHALL perform the functions of the President as Acting President.’
The phrase which caused the uproar should therefore not have done so as the writer of the letter had made it clear where he derives his powers from to so act and even if he by default goes ahead to say anything to the contrary he should simply have been ignored as he cannot approbate and reprobate at the same time.
But that is not even the case here as the constitutional provision which the president relied on to go on medical provision cannot be exercised in part. So, for anybody to input meaning that goes against the spirit and wording of the letter is outright mischievous.
Even if one agrees without conceding that the President had not expressly stated that the vice president should step forth and run the affairs of the country as ‘acting president’, how does that amount to a declaration that the office of the vice president is no more?
The farthest this line of argument would have been stretched was to have said that he continues in his role as vice even in the absence of the president, the added non existent implication is therefore puerile and without legal basis.
This leads to the issue of calling on the National Assembly to commence impeachment proceeding on the president for alleged gross misconduct.
The truth is that while the interpretation of gross misconduct is inelastic, the framers of the Constitution did not intend it as a joke or a tool for use by mischief makers like Adegboruwa and his cohorts want to have us believe .
‘Gross’ as the word connotes here is the qualifier that magnifies the misdeed to the proportion intended by the framers of the Constitution which does not exist here. And in this case, even if the letter could be said to have shied away from addressing the VP as acting president, pray, where is the gross misconduct here?
The mere transmission of a letter to the National Assembly to intimate it of the president’s intention to travel and the recourse to a constitutional provision in the same letter, is enough proof that the president respects the Constitution and is well aware of the demand when he is not available.
If any one was in doubt, the best thing to have done was to have cross checked the wording of the section of the Constitution cited and hold the President to account on that basis if and when he goes against that provision.
Looking for loopholes in areas where the weight of the law would suffice is like saying that the letter by the president carries more weight than the Constitution.
But every lawyer knows that even where there is that intent and such comes into conflict with the ground norm, it is the Constitution that holds sway.
It is therefore assumed that by citing section 145, the president has done the appropriate thing which in this case is the recognition of the vice president as the acting president so the issue of whether he can sack or appoint anybody does not arise. He needs not sack anyone except some people are planning to sack members of the Federal Executive Council to perfect another sinister agenda.
If a president dies for example, it does not matter whether he stated when he was alive that the vice president should take over from him or not as the Constitution has made that explicitly clear who should take over
The same applies to the current situation where the President has to be away. One wonders what the hoopla is all about then.
At this juncture, one can assure all concerned that there is no constitutional crisis in the country. It is those that are out to make political capital out of the current situation that are seeing a constitutional crisis when there is none.
So the call on the National Assembly to reject the President’s letter does not arise. If anything, it would even create more chaos than the storm in a tea cup interest the letter is generating now because if that happens, it would be assumed that the President had travelled and left the country without transmitting a letter to the national Assembly which will set the tone for a constitutional crisis the end of which no one can tell.
Kuanum is a forensic expert and assessor with the Global Amnesty Watch Foundation, contributed this piece from Lagos.
Uncategorized
Kwara 2027: APC Group Rejects Olasumbo’s Rep Candidacy
- Says She’s A Non-indigene Who Hails From Ogun State
Stephen Olufemi Oni Ilorin
A wave of discontent has continued to pervade the All Progressives Congress (APC) in the Ekiti/ Irepodun/Isin/Oke-Ero Federal Constituency of Kwara State, as a
prominent group, under the aegis of Concerned APC Stakeholders, has vehemently opposed the purported nomination of Hon. Florence Olasumbo Oyeyemi as the party’s candidate for the House of Representatives in the 2027 general elections.
According to the group, the candidate for their constituency should be an indigene of the Ekiti bloc, and not Olasumbo, who, they said, hails from Ijebu in Ogun State.
They described the development as a betrayal of the aspirations of party faithful and constituents, insisting that Olasumbo does not represent the interests or identity of the people she is expected to serve.
Addressing a press conference in Ilorin, the Kwara State capital, the Coordinator of the group, Hon. Bayode Dada, said the alleged move to replace Hon. Tunji Olawuyi, popularly known as Ajuloopin, with Oyeyemi was unacceptable and capable of jeopardising the demand of the Ekiti bloc for the House of Representatives slot, adding that the movie was capable of destabilising the party ahead of the general elections, while calling for an urgent change of Olasumbo’s name to a bonafide indigene of the Ekiti bloc.
According to Dada, while many members had accepted the decision that Ajuloopin should no longer fly the party’s flag, replacing him with someone they described as a non-indigene was a dangerous move that could trigger widespread dissatisfaction within the APC.
“All we need now is Ekiti for Ekiti and not an Ijebu woman from Ogun state to take our slot, we can’t afford to toy with our destiny by placing it in the hands of a stranger,” he said.
He alleged that Oyeyemi is not an indigene of either Oke-Ero Local Government Area or Kwara State, claiming instead that she hails from Ijebu in Ogun State.
He argued that such a background makes it difficult for her to understand the peculiar challenges, aspirations and developmental needs of the constituency.
“The people deserve a representative who shares their history, understands their struggles and has deep roots in the constituency.
“Leadership is not just about political appointment; it is also about identity, trust and genuine connection with the people,” Adewara stated.
He warned that imposing what he described as an outsider on the constituency could provoke internal resistance within the APC and weaken the party’s electoral strength, thereby creating an opportunity for opposition parties to capitalise on the growing discontent.
“We appreciate the fact that Ajuloopin is no longer in the race because many believed retaining him could have negatively affected our chances at the polls.
“However, replacing him with Olasumbo is equally unacceptable because she does not represent what the people want,” he said.
The Coordinator urged the national and state leadership of the APC to retrace their steps and ensure that the party’s candidate emerges through a transparent process that respects both the outcome of the primaries and the wishes of party members in the constituency.
He further argued that any attempt to sideline qualified aspirants who are bona fide indigenes of the constituency could deepen existing divisions within the party and erode the confidence of loyal supporters.
Describing the reported nomination as insensitive, Dada maintained that the people of Oke-Ero had endured years of perceived political marginalisation and should not be subjected to what he termed another act of political imposition.
“We need an original son or daughter of Oke-Ero to replace Ajuloopin, not someone from Ijebu in Ogun State.
“The people deserve representation that reflects their identity and protects their interests,” he added.
He noted that questions of zoning, local identity and grassroots acceptance have historically played significant roles in determining electoral outcomes in many parts of Nigeria.
He said, Candidates perceived as lacking local legitimacy often face resistance from party structures and the electorate, regardless of their political credentials.
He said that internal disagreements over candidate selection remain one of the leading causes of defections and electoral setbacks for political parties in Nigeria.
According to him, Several elections have demonstrated that unresolved disputes arising from party primaries and nominations frequently weaken campaign cohesion and benefit opposition parties.
As of the time of filing this report, neither Miss Florence Olasumbo Oyeyemi nor the leadership of the APC in Kwara State had issued an official response to the allegations and demands contained in the statement.
The controversy is expected to intensify discussions within the party over fairness, inclusiveness and the importance of local representation as political realignments continue within the constituency.
Uncategorized
‘You are a priest’ — Osinbajo recounts encounter that made him quit drinking alcohol
By: Fabian Apechihin
Former Vice President Yemi Osinbajo has shared the personal experience that led him to stop drinking alcohol, describing it as a defining moment during his time on a United Nations mission in Somalia.
Speaking in a video that has since gone viral, Osinbajo, who is also a pastor, revealed that he occasionally drank red wine and beer before deciding to quit completely.
According to him, the turning point came while he was serving in Mogadishu. After preaching at a fellowship service on a Sunday, he planned to buy a couple of cans of beer and return to his room.
Osinbajo recalled entering a restaurant within the UN camp, where he met colleagues from different countries who were drinking. On seeing him, they immediately tried to hide their alcoholic drinks.
Curious about their reaction, he asked one of his colleagues from Denmark why they were concealing the drinks.
According to Osinbajo, the colleague replied: “You are the priest, and we cannot be drinking around the priest.”
He said the response prompted deep reflection about his calling and the example he was setting for others.
Osinbajo explained that the encounter made him realize that although certain actions may be permissible, they may not always be appropriate.
Quoting a biblical principle, he said, “All things are lawful for me, but all things are not expedient.”
He added that from that day onward, he made the personal decision to stop drinking alcohol completely.
Recalling the incident, Osinbajo said:
“I like my red wine once in a while, and then I like my beer. On this particular Sunday, I was coming back from the fellowship where I had preached, and I was just hoping to buy two canned Heineken and go to my room and read my Bible.
“There were many restaurants in the UN compound in Mogadishu. So, I went to this particular restaurant, and as I walked in, I saw many of my colleagues from different countries. They were drinking… They said, ‘You are the priest, and we cannot be drinking around the priest.’ That made me realize that all things may be lawful, but not all things are expedient.”
Uncategorized
Former VP Osinbajo gets new appointment at Nigerian Conservation Foundation
By: Fabian Apechihin
Former Vice President Yemi Osinbajo has been appointed President of the Board of Trustees of the Nigerian Conservation Foundation, pledging to strengthen environmental conservation and climate action in Nigeria.
Osinbajo made the commitment on Wednesday during his acceptance speech at the Foundation’s 37th Annual General Meeting held in Lagos.
In his remarks, the former vice president paid tribute to the founding fathers of the NCF, especially its President Emeritus, Chief Philip Asiodu, for championing environmental conservation long before climate change became a major global issue.
He also acknowledged the contributions of the late Chief S.L. Edu and other founding trustees, saying their vision laid the foundation for Nigeria’s biodiversity conservation movement.
“They deserve our commendation and gratitude because, but for their vision, Nigeria would not have had the strong foundation it has today for climate action,” Osinbajo said.
Osinbajo noted that climate change is increasingly affecting Nigeria through flooding, rising temperatures and other environmental challenges. He added that extreme temperatures being recorded in parts of Europe highlight the urgency of global climate action.
“There is no question that we are living in the most challenging times with respect to climate change,” he stated.
Despite the challenges, he expressed optimism that advances in technology, innovation and scientific knowledge would provide new opportunities to address environmental problems and promote sustainability.
Describing the NCF as Nigeria’s leading non-governmental organisation focused on environmental conservation and climate action, Osinbajo commended its trustees, staff, volunteers and development partners for sustaining its programmes over the years.
Accepting his new role, he pledged to build on the achievements of previous leaders and deepen collaboration with stakeholders.
“I accept this responsibility with great humility and gratitude. I look forward to working with the Board, management, staff, volunteers and partners to advance the Foundation’s mission and secure a healthier environment for future generations,” he said.
He also reaffirmed his commitment to strengthening the Foundation’s leadership role in biodiversity conservation and environmental sustainability across Nigeria.
-
Uncategorized5 years agoFG, states urged to harness flooding for ranching, others with technology – Agbaje
-
Headlines10 years agoBreaking: EFCC seals Borno House of Assembly, as Hon members take to their heels
-
News12 years agoNigeria Security Operatives Stage Manhunt For Homosexual Perpetrator
-
News9 years agoHow 21-year-old Girl fled community over accusation of lesbianism
-
News10 years agoYobe Gov Moves Against Deputy
-
Opinion7 years ago7 signs she has friend zoned you
-
Technology5 years ago
Online job placement company headhunts women
-
Headlines10 years agoBorno Dep Gov Abducts Another Church Leader
