Uncategorized
Buhari’s letter: Creating a Constitutional crisis where there is none
By: Faeren Kuanum Terrence
The wordings of the letter conveying President Muhammadu Buhari’s decision to travel to the Uk for medical treatment has sparked a controversy.
From fears that the president may sneak out of the country without informing the National Assembly, the emanating issue after the president has observed all the processes for him to proceed on the medical vacation including transmitting a letter to the National Assembly as well as informing the citizenry has transmuted into a hullabaloo on the literal meaning of a certain phrase in the letter.
The angst has to do with the aspect of the letter which says the vice president will coordinate the activities of the government while the president is away.
And for this, all manners of interpretations have emerged to the extent that some have called on the president to resign saying he has by that comment breached the Nigerian Constitution and (you won’t believe this) annulled the office of the vice president.
Ebun-Olu Adegboruwa, a lawyer, even suggested that the use of the phrase constitutes immense damage to the Constitution and requires a no less drastic measure as commencing impeachment proceedings against the president for the infraction to be addressed.
He says this is because the function of a coordinator of government activities does not equal that of an acting president in that the former is a person of equal status with others, do cannot make appointments or sack anybody while the President is away, cannot discipline any erring minister, is limited in policy decisions, and “has no power of control over the ‘Cabal’ to whom the president has handed over power, albeit illegally.”
“In all, he says, “the National Assembly should commence impeachment proceedings against the President for gross misconduct.”
But the lawyer, to paraphrase a Bible passage, can be said to be exhibiting zeal without adequate knowledge on the subject matter.
A careful and disinterested look at the letter would reveal both the zeal and lack of depth to the interpretation given.
This is what the letter says, ” In compliance with Section 145 (1) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) I wish to inform the Distinguished Senate that I will be away for a scheduled medical follow-up with my doctors in London. The length of my stay will be determined by the doctor’s advice. While I am away, the Vice President will coordinate the activities of the Government.”
We can see clearly that even from the opening phrase of the letter, the President makes no pretense about his resolve to abide by Constitutional provisions and had even made the point that his actions are guided strictly by that provision.
If the president had intended to be dubious, nebulous or evasive as is being insinuated in the message he intended to convey, he would have known better than to make the Constitution his guide and would have completely left out constitutional provisions in the letter since he is not in any way compelled to do so.
It is amazing how a clear matter-of – fact case of respect for the rule of law is now being twisted to look otherwise just to score a political point.
Sections 145 which the president cited states thus: ‘Whenever the President is proceeding on vacation or is otherwise unable to discharge the functions of his office, he shall transmit a written declaration to the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives to that effect, and until he transmits to them a written declaration to the contrary, the Vice President SHALL perform the functions of the President as Acting President.’
The phrase which caused the uproar should therefore not have done so as the writer of the letter had made it clear where he derives his powers from to so act and even if he by default goes ahead to say anything to the contrary he should simply have been ignored as he cannot approbate and reprobate at the same time.
But that is not even the case here as the constitutional provision which the president relied on to go on medical provision cannot be exercised in part. So, for anybody to input meaning that goes against the spirit and wording of the letter is outright mischievous.
Even if one agrees without conceding that the President had not expressly stated that the vice president should step forth and run the affairs of the country as ‘acting president’, how does that amount to a declaration that the office of the vice president is no more?
The farthest this line of argument would have been stretched was to have said that he continues in his role as vice even in the absence of the president, the added non existent implication is therefore puerile and without legal basis.
This leads to the issue of calling on the National Assembly to commence impeachment proceeding on the president for alleged gross misconduct.
The truth is that while the interpretation of gross misconduct is inelastic, the framers of the Constitution did not intend it as a joke or a tool for use by mischief makers like Adegboruwa and his cohorts want to have us believe .
‘Gross’ as the word connotes here is the qualifier that magnifies the misdeed to the proportion intended by the framers of the Constitution which does not exist here. And in this case, even if the letter could be said to have shied away from addressing the VP as acting president, pray, where is the gross misconduct here?
The mere transmission of a letter to the National Assembly to intimate it of the president’s intention to travel and the recourse to a constitutional provision in the same letter, is enough proof that the president respects the Constitution and is well aware of the demand when he is not available.
If any one was in doubt, the best thing to have done was to have cross checked the wording of the section of the Constitution cited and hold the President to account on that basis if and when he goes against that provision.
Looking for loopholes in areas where the weight of the law would suffice is like saying that the letter by the president carries more weight than the Constitution.
But every lawyer knows that even where there is that intent and such comes into conflict with the ground norm, it is the Constitution that holds sway.
It is therefore assumed that by citing section 145, the president has done the appropriate thing which in this case is the recognition of the vice president as the acting president so the issue of whether he can sack or appoint anybody does not arise. He needs not sack anyone except some people are planning to sack members of the Federal Executive Council to perfect another sinister agenda.
If a president dies for example, it does not matter whether he stated when he was alive that the vice president should take over from him or not as the Constitution has made that explicitly clear who should take over
The same applies to the current situation where the President has to be away. One wonders what the hoopla is all about then.
At this juncture, one can assure all concerned that there is no constitutional crisis in the country. It is those that are out to make political capital out of the current situation that are seeing a constitutional crisis when there is none.
So the call on the National Assembly to reject the President’s letter does not arise. If anything, it would even create more chaos than the storm in a tea cup interest the letter is generating now because if that happens, it would be assumed that the President had travelled and left the country without transmitting a letter to the national Assembly which will set the tone for a constitutional crisis the end of which no one can tell.
Kuanum is a forensic expert and assessor with the Global Amnesty Watch Foundation, contributed this piece from Lagos.
Uncategorized
Niger Delta Ex-Agitators Back Tinubu’s Re-election, Cite Amnesty Programme Expansion
A coalition of former agitators from the Niger Delta region has passed a vote of confidence in President Bola Ahmed Tinubu and formally endorsed his re-election ahead of the 2027 general elections, citing tangible progress under his administration’s Renewed Hope Agenda.
The Coalition of Niger Delta Ex-Agitators for Good Governance, in a position statement issued on Monday, said it unanimously supports the president’s second-term bid, pointing to the expansion of the Presidential Amnesty Programme as a key indicator of inclusive governance.
The coalition noted that the programme, under the leadership of Administrator Chief Dr. Dennis Otuaro, PhD, has been broadened to accommodate previously undocumented, crisis-impacted, and uneducated ex-agitators who had been excluded under prior administrations.
According to the statement, over 10,000 youths have been deployed domestically for educational advancement since Otuaro assumed office, while more than 200 others have been sponsored for specialised studies abroad in fields including engineering, healthcare, and artificial intelligence.
The group also commended National Security Adviser Malam Nuhu Ribadu for his backing of Otuaro’s initiatives , describing the collaboration as instrumental to the relative peace now observed across the region.
“Peace has significantly improved across the Niger Delta region,” the coalition stated, crediting Otuaro’s approach of dialogue, stakeholder engagement, and reconciliation for the shift in the security climate.
While acknowledging that challenges including socio-economic inequality and youth unemployment persist, the coalition said the current administration’s investments in skills acquisition, formal education, and job creation represent a departure from the neglect of previous years.
The group called on all stakeholders across the Niger Delta to unite behind President Tinubu, arguing that continuity in leadership would be critical to sustaining ongoing programmes and advancing what it described as transformative development for the region.
Uncategorized
UNCERTAINTIES OVER PARTY PRIMARIES
☆☆☆ As Parties Narrow Down on Candidates.
By: Special Correspondent.
With the deadline for the submission of candidates for the 2027 general elections approaches, a gale of endorsements sweeping across several states has triggered growing disquiet within political parties, with aggrieved aspirants, stakeholders and supporters raising fresh concerns over alleged imposition of candidates and the steady erosion of internal democracy.
By Hassan Taiye
Across both the ruling and opposition parties, influential political figures, governors, party leaders and interest groups have intensified endorsements of preferred aspirants for governorship, senatorial, House of Representatives and state assembly positions, often ahead of formal primaries.
In Nasarawa State, Governor Abdullahi Sule’s open support for preferred political successor, Senator Aliyu Ahmed Wadada has continued to generate political discussions, with party stakeholders divided over the implications for the governorship race in the state .
Similar situations have played out in other states where incumbent governors are believed to be positioning loyalists to succeed them in 2027.
In Akwa Ibom State, Governor Umo Eno’s political body language and consultations within the ruling structure have also sparked speculations over succession plans, while in Delta State, political watchers continue to monitor Governor Sheriff Oborevwori’s influence over the emerging political permutations ahead of the next governorship contest.
In Lagos State, discussions around the political structure of Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu and key party leaders have continued to shape conversations around succession, just as similar developments have been reported in Kaduna, Kano and Benue where powerful political blocs are already aligning behind preferred aspirants.
The wave ofAs the deadline for the submission of candidates for the 2027 general elections approaches, a gale of endorsements sweeping across several states has triggered growing disquiet within political parties, withh aggrieved aspirants, stakeholders and supporters raising fresh concerns over alleged imposition of candidates and the steady erosion of internal democracy.
By Hassan Taiye
Across both the ruling and opposition parties, influential political figures, governors, party leaders and interest groups have intensified endorsements of preferred aspirants for governorship, senatorial, House of Representatives and state assembly positions, often ahead of formal primaries.
In Nasarawa State, Governor Abdullahi Sule’s open support for preferred political successor, Senator Aliyu Ahmed Wadada has continued to generate political discussions, with party stakeholders divided over the implications for the governorship race in the state .
Similar situations have played out in other states where incumbent governors are believed to be positioning loyalists to succeed them in 2027.
In Akwa Ibom State, Governor Umo Eno’s political body language and consultations within the ruling structure have also sparked speculations over succession plans, while in Delta State, political watchers continue to monitor Governor Sheriff Oborevwori’s influence over the emerging political permutations ahead of the next governorship contest.
In Lagos State, discussions around the political structure of Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu and key party leaders have continued to shape conversations around succession, just as similar developments have been reported in Kaduna, Kano and Benue where powerful political blocs are already aligning behind preferred aspirants.
The wave of endorsements, while presented by party loyalists as strategic moves aimed at strengthening party cohesion and avoiding divisive contests, has instead generated widespread tension in many states where other aspirants view the moves as deliberate attempts to sideline them from the race.
In several states, party offices have become centres of protests, consultations and behind-the-scenes negotiations, as aspirants who feel shortchanged push back against what they describe as predetermined outcomes designed to favour political loyalists and allies of powerful office holders.
Some party members have warned that the growing trend could spark defections, parallel party structures and legal battles capable of weakening party chances ahead of the general elections.
Political observers note that endorsements are not new in Nigeria’s political landscape, but the scale and timing of the current wave have heightened anxieties, especially as many aspirants insist that only transparent primaries can guarantee fairness and party unity.
In some states, youth groups and women wings of political parties have also expressed dissatisfaction, accusing party leaders of ignoring grassroots input and reducing the selection process to elite negotiations dominated by a few power brokers.
A chieftain of one of the major political parties in the North-Central zone, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said the endorsement culture was creating avoidable hostility.
“When candidates are endorsed long before primaries, it sends a message that the process is already concluded. This discourages participation and weakens confidence in the party structure,” he said.
Similarly, some civil society organisations have urged political parties and the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to ensure that the integrity of the nomination process is protected to avoid voter apathy and post-primary litigations.
They argued that credible internal democracy remains the foundation for credible general elections, warning that the imposition of candidates could undermine public trust in the democratic process.
Despite the tension, party leaders defending the endorsements insist that consensus arrangements remain lawful and necessary in managing complex political interests, provided they are carried out within the framework of party constitutions and the Electoral Act.
They maintain that political realities often require negotiations and strategic alignments to preserve party stability and prevent destructive internal conflicts.
However, with the clock ticking toward candidate submission deadlines, many stakeholders believe the coming weeks will determine whether the endorsement wave will consolidate party strength or deepen internal fractures capable of reshaping the political landscape ahead of 2027. endorsements, while presented by party loyalists as strategic moves aimed at strengthening party cohesion and avoiding divisive contests, has instead generated widespread tension in many states where other aspirants view the moves as deliberate attempts to sideline them from the race.
In several states, party offices have become centres of protests, consultations and behind-the-scenes negotiations, as aspirants who feel shortchanged push back against what they describe as predetermined outcomes designed to favour political loyalists and allies of powerful office holders.
Some party members have warned that the growing trend could spark defections, parallel party structures and legal battles capable of weakening party chances ahead of the general elections.
Political observers note that endorsements are not new in Nigeria’s political landscape, but the scale and timing of the current wave have heightened anxieties, especially as many aspirants insist that only transparent primaries can guarantee fairness and party unity.
In some states, youth groups and women wings of political parties have also expressed dissatisfaction, accusing party leaders of ignoring grassroots input and reducing the selection process toj elite negotiations dominated by a few power brokers.
A chieftain of one of the major political parties in the North-Central zone, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said the endorsement culture was creating avoidable hostility.
“When candidates are endorsed long before primaries, it sends a message that the process is already concluded. This discourages participation and weakens confidence in the party structure,” he said.
Similarly, some civil society organisations have urged political parties and the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to ensure that the integrity of the nomination process is protected to avoid voter apathy and post-primary litigations.
They argued that credible internal democracy remains the foundation for credible general elections, warning that the imposition of candidates could undermine public trust in the democratic process.
Despite the tension, party leaders defending the endorsements insist that consensus arrangements remain lawful and necessary in managing complex political interests, provided they are carried out within the framework of party constitutions and the Electoral Act.
They maintain that political realities often require negotiations and strategic alignments to preserve party stability and prevent destructive internal conflicts.
However, with the clock ticking toward candidate submission deadlines, many stakeholders believe the coming weeks will determine whether the endorsement wave will consolidate party strength or deepen internal fractures capable of reshaping the political landscape ahead of 2027.
Uncategorized
JS Tarka Stadium goes agog as Gwer East, Gboko II youths battle for Awunah’s N1 million prize, trophy
From Hassan Taiye
Thousands of football enthusiasts and supporters of Hon. Dave Awunah, a frontline aspirant for the Benue North Senatorial District in the 2027 senatorial election, stormed the JS Tarka Stadium, Gboko, as early as 9 a.m. for the grand finale of the Dave Awunah Zone B 2026 Invitational Soccer Tournament.
The one-week football fiesta attracted youths in their thousands from Guma, Makurdi, Gwer West and Gwer East Local Government Areas, turning the stadium into a centre of excitement and celebration.
The invitational tournament, our correspondent gathered, was organised as part of Hon. Awunah’s commitment to youth development, taking young people off the streets and campaigning against drug abuse, narcotics and other social vices.
Awunah, who has consistently projected himself as a strong advocate for youth empowerment, has in recent months supported youths, women, widows and artisans across the Benue North Senatorial District.
He has also reportedly received blessings and endorsements from several traditional rulers within the district.
One traditional ruler, who spoke on condition of anonymity due to his position, described Awunah as a rare politician with genuine concern for the people.
“For the first time, we are witnessing a selfless politician who matches his words with action by empowering women, youths and widows, even before assuming office,” he said.
He added, “No candidate can stand against him in the next election. We will vote for him massively.”
Many political observers believe Awunah currently enjoys strong grassroots support across the senatorial district.
Youths from the various local government areas have also continued to express strong support for his senatorial ambition, describing him as a leader with compassion and vision.
A philanthropist and youth mobiliser, Titus Apenda from Guma, linked Awunah’s generosity to his late father, Padopas.
“Generosity runs in their blood. It is a natural trait, and he is not doing it for selfish reasons. He may have inherited it from his father,” Apenda said.
-
Uncategorized5 years agoFG, states urged to harness flooding for ranching, others with technology – Agbaje
-
Headlines10 years agoBreaking: EFCC seals Borno House of Assembly, as Hon members take to their heels
-
News12 years agoNigeria Security Operatives Stage Manhunt For Homosexual Perpetrator
-
News9 years agoHow 21-year-old Girl fled community over accusation of lesbianism
-
News10 years agoYobe Gov Moves Against Deputy
-
Opinion7 years ago7 signs she has friend zoned you
-
Technology5 years ago
Online job placement company headhunts women
-
Headlines10 years agoBorno Dep Gov Abducts Another Church Leader
