Connect with us

News

Offa/Erin-Ile Boundary Clashes: On 1975 Peace Accord we stand- Offa community

Published

on


Stephen Olufemi Oni, Ilorin

There seems to be no letup in the age-long boundary disputes and clashes between Offa and Erin-Ile communities in Kwara state as Offa community is insisting that “the Kere Ipinle boundary established by the Col. Ibrahim Taiwo Peace Accord, which was signed by the two communities in 1975,” remains sacrosanct and should be enforced by the state government for lasting peace to reign, adding that the peace accord was also “gazetted into law by another Military Governor of the state, Col. P.A.M Ogar, in pursuant to the Kwara State Legal Notice No. 4 1997.”

This is as the Erin-Ile community is hanging on to the Adaramola Boundary Adjustment Committee Report and the Supreme Court judgments of 1973 and 2018, which they claimed awarded the disputed areas to them.

It would be recalled that the unresolved boundary disputes, antedating Nigerian independence, has culminated in incessant avoidable clashes between the two communities, resulting in losses of several lives and properties on both sides.

Addressing journalists in Offa, headquarters of Offa local government area, over the weekend, Justice Olabanji Orilonise (Retd), said Erin-Ile community must understand that the Supreme Court Judgments of 1973 and 2018, which they are erroneously clinging on to, did not award any Offa land to their community, while event has overtaken the Adaramola Report and has ceased to exist.

He said: “The Adaramola report is dead and buried having regards to the provision of Section 21 of the Local Boundary Settlement Amendment Edict, N0 16. 1975 which gave the Military Governor powers to reverse, nullify, set aside and review the Report. The Report has been set aside/varied by the Col. P. A. M. Ogar’s Edict which created new boundary lines between the two Communities. So, Adaramola’s Report no longer exist and cannot be hung unto by the Erin-Ile Community to lay claim to any land in Offa.

“In the same vein, the Supreme Court Judgments of 1973 and 2018 (refer to analysis already done). These Judgments did not award any land to Erin-Ile. More importantly, the Supreme Court did decline jurisdiction on Adaramola’s Report which is no longer in existence having been reversed, nullified, and reviewed by the appropriate Authority in Kwara State.”

Justice Orilonise, who is the Chairman, Offa Boundary Committee, admonished the State Government to “take over full possession of the ‘Buffer Zone’ as defined in the Kwara State Legal Notices 1, 2, 3, & 4 1997, adding that the two communities should be encouraged to imbibe the culture of living in peaceful coexistence for their own betterment and the State at large.

The Offa Boundary Committee Chairman reiterated that the ‘Unity Road’ created by former Senate President Bukola Saraki when he was the Governor of the State, is not acceptable to Offa Community as the boundary between Offa and Erin-Ile, as well as boundary between Offa Local Government and Oyun Local Government on that axis, on the grounds that the construction of the road was a violation of Section 8 (4) of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended) as its relates to adjustment of Local Government Boundary.

Besides, he said their rejection of the ‘Unity Road’ was because it was a marked departure from Ogar’s Edict, while the construction of the ‘Unity Road’ cut deep into Offa family lands thereby violating the provisions of Section 8 (4) of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended).

He said: “For the avoidance of doubt, the provision of Section 8 (4) of the 1999 Constitution stipulates that a bill for a law of a House of Assembly for the purpose of boundary adjustment of any existing local government area shall only be passed if a request for the boundary adjustment is supported by two-thirds majority of members (representing the area demanding and the area affected by the boundary adjustment) in the House of Assembly in respect of the area, and
the local government council in respect of the area, is received by the House of Assembly, and a proposal for the boundary adjustment is approved by a simple majority of members of the House of Assembly in respect of the area concerned.”

End

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Court fixes August 27 for hearing in Benue APC candidates’ suit

Published

on

By

A Federal High Court in Abuja has fixed August 27 for definite hearing in a suit filed by aggrieved members of the Benue State chapter of the All Progressives Congress (APC), who are challenging their alleged substitution as validly nominated candidates for the 2027 general election.
Justice Inyang Ekwo adjourned the matter at the instance of counsel to the plaintiffs, Mohammed Ndarani (SAN), who sought time to respond to a preliminary objection filed by the APC, the first defendant, challenging the court’s jurisdiction to hear the suit.

Justice Ekwo directed counsel for the parties to file and exchange their processes before the next adjourned date, warning that any counsel who failed to do so would be personalized.
Matthew Burka appeared for the APC, while the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), the second defendant, was represented by Oluwole Olukunle.
The adjournment followed an earlier order by the court directing the APC and INEC to maintain the status quo in the dispute over candidates who emerged from the party’s Benue State primaries.
The order was made last Thursday during proceedings in Suit No. FHC/ABJ/CS/1429/2026, filed by Engr. Sesugh kaaba and other aggrieved APC candidates from Benue State against the party and the electoral commission.
The plaintiffs, through an ex parte motion filed on July 5, sought six interim reliefs, including an order restraining the APC from substituting its validly nominated candidates through a June 29 correspondence to INEC, or any subsequent communication, pending determination of the substantive suit. They also asked the court to compel the APC to transmit to INEC the names of candidates validly nominated during primaries monitored by the commission.
When the matter first came up on July 8, the court declined to grant the interim application immediately, directing the APC and INEC to appear and respond before any ruling. The matter was adjourned to July 16.
At Thursday’s proceedings, counsel for the APC and INEC were in court, while the plaintiffs were represented by Ndarani and his legal team.
Ruling on the application, Justice Ekwo held that since issues had been joined by the parties — particularly with INEC now before the court the defendants were bound by law to preserve the subject matter of the litigation pending determination of the suit. When plaintiffs’ counsel urged the court to caution the APC and INEC against any action affecting the disputed list of candidates, the judge said it was “not a matter of advice but of law,” stressing that the defendants were bound to maintain the status quo.
The court accordingly restrained the APC and INEC from taking any action capable of altering the disputed list of candidates pending the hearing and determination of the substantive suit. The defendants did not object to the restraining order.
At the commencement of proceedings, the court noted that all parties had voluntarily submitted to its jurisdiction by filing and exchanging their respective processes, and held that there was no procedural or jurisdictional impediment to an expeditious determination of the case. It directed that the matter be heard without further delay.
In furtherance of preserving the res and safeguarding the judicial process, the court ordered all parties to maintain the status quo pending final determination of the suit, restraining any act capable of prejudicing the rights of the parties or rendering the proceedings nugatory. It further directed that INEC be served forthwith with the originating and all consequential processes.
The effect of the subsisting order is that INEC is restrained from tampering with the existing list of candidates and from receiving, recognising, or acting on any purported substituted list of National Assembly candidates from Benue State submitted by the APC.

Continue Reading

News

CONGRATULATION TO HON. GINIKA FLORENCE TOR ON HER APPOINTMENT AS FEDERAL COMMISSIONER, NATIONAL SALARIES, INCOMES AND WAGES COMMISSION

Published

on

By

I, Amb. Tonye Sylvester Iyade, extend my warmest congratulations to Hon. Ginika Florence Tor on her well-deserved appointment as a Federal Commissioner of the National Salaries, Incomes and Wages Commission by His Excellency, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, GCFR.

This prestigious appointment is a clear recognition of Hon. Ginika Florence Tor’s years of dedicated service, unwavering loyalty, competence, and commitment to nation-building. Her appointment reflects the confidence reposed in her ability to contribute meaningfully to the advancement of the Commission’s mandate and the continued progress of our dear nation.

I also wish to express my profound appreciation to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, GCFR.for this thoughtful appointment. It is yet another demonstration that the President values commitment, hard work, capacity, and those who have remained steadfast in supporting and advancing the ideals of the Renewed Hope Agenda. By appointing capable and experienced individuals into strategic positions, the President continues to reinforce his administration’s commitment to good governance, merit, and effective service delivery.

There is no doubt that Hon. Ginika Florence Tor possesses the experience, character, and leadership qualities required to excel in this important national assignment. I am confident that she will discharge her responsibilities with integrity, professionalism, and dedication, while contributing significantly to the realization of the Renewed Hope vision of the Tinubu administration.

As she assumes this important office, I pray that Almighty God grants her wisdom, strength, sound health, and divine guidance to serve Nigeria with excellence and leave behind a legacy of impactful service.

Congratulations once again, Hon. Ginika Florence Tor, on this remarkable and well-deserved appointment. I wish you a successful and rewarding tenure in service to our great nation.

Signed:

Amb. Tonye Sylvester Iyade

Continue Reading

News

Borno Deputy Governorship: Shealting The Swords , Healing The Wounds.

Published

on

By

BY: Inuwa Bwala.

Given the role of a Deputy Governor, it is rather an anathrma to campaign, seeking to be chosen, as a deputy governorship candidate.
Changing dynamics have however seen to the emergence of individuals, openly campaigningy , to be so chosen.
It is a truism that, the choice is the prerogative of the governorship candidate, to nominate someone, he or she feels he or she can blend well.
The case in Borno for the oncoming elections, presents a case study, of people doing things wrongly and expect to alter a long standing narrative.
In the last few days, since Ali Abdullahi, was chosen as the runningmate to Engineer Mustapha Gubio, the polity seems to be getting charged.
I have tried to jaxtapose argumentson the appropriateness or lack of it, in the choice of Ali Abdullahi, as the deputy Governorship candidate of the All Progresdives Congress, APC, in Borno state.
While some justify the choice, others were not too comfortable with it.
To many, there was no sufficient consultations, with critical stakeholders, before the choice was made public.
To others, the candidate was picked from outside the traditional political circle, and yet to others, he is not conversant with the ways of the people, having been born and bred outside the enviroment.
I understand others even feel that the choice negates the expectations of frontrunners in the campaigns, with some people even developing a sense of entitlement, in way.
In as much as everybody os granted the right to aspire, it has never been the norm to consult everybody before a deputy governorship candidate is chosen.
It is normal to try selling the idea, but it is not a must, that the evrntual choice must be someone others feel must be the one.
No matter how anyone feels, there are rooms for a rhendezvous of interests, in a party that controls the government.
And given our peculiar circumstances in Borno, we have to give it to the candidate, to nominate somebody he feels he could blend with, effectively.
That most of the arguments did not center on competence, capacity or value addition of the deputy governorship candidate, leave room for one to surmise that, the conventional practice, rrlies more on atributes, above interest.
I would rather, those who feel slighted to reminiscence, on Ali Abdullahi’s past performances, and not the lack of patronage, or political convenience, on their sides.
The Task Ahead, presupposes that, while Borno is still smarting from years of insecurity, we do not enjoy the luxury of internal political bickerings, which could cause dislocations and possible going into the elections as a divided house.
It is a truism that we need a deputy governor, with requisite administrative experience and technical capacity, to fully compliment the efforts of Engineer Mustapha Gubio, so that together they can hit the ground running reminisceint of the Governor Zulum era. A curious look into Ali Abdullahi’s pedigree, shows that, he brings that capacity, in the same fashion that he demonstrated at SEMA. I have no doubt at the back of my mind, that both governor Zulum and our governorship candidate, Mustapha Gubio, are passionate about the continuity of the Zulum Agenda, hence the choice of Ali SEMA, as he is popularly known.
Taking into consideration the need to live up to the expectations of the people, especially on the need to rebuild Borno, they may have considered changing the course midstream may tend to slow us down.
I know as a matter of fact, that, Ali Abdullahi has been aligned to Zulum’s vision of service, integrity, and results, for a long time.
That the governor has gone out of his way in trying to placate those who may have nursed the ambition of being the ones to be considwred, points to the fact that, the Gubio/Abdullahi ticket was chosen to unite us, not divide us.
I am sure the Governor values every zone, every elder, and every stakeholder, and never intended to shut out anybody. We may recall, that, similar skepticism greeted the emergence of Zulum and Kadafur in 2023, but having seen their best sides, makes Borno the better off for it today.
Shealthing our swords and healing the wounds of this innitial perceibed snub, is a sinquanon to making the choice the best team, we could put forward for Borno.
I am compelled to appeal to all of us to look beyond personal interests and prioritize Borno, even as we strive to deliver. The Governor’s door remains open for dialogue, as always.
Let us rally behind this ticket, and mot risk a divided house that cannot deliver to our people. A united APC in Borno is what our people expect of us.

Let the narrative turn to the choice of Ali Abdullahi as Deputy Governorship candidate is about *competence, continuity, and service to Borno people, and not about how he emerged.
Governor Babagana Umara Zulum with his deputy have showed focus on finishing the work of rebuilding Borno’s destroyed schools, hospitals and roads, and resettling our people. His successor needs a deputy who understands this vission and shares that same commitment.

Ali Abdullahi has the experience, he has demonstrated loyalty, and has showed dedication. Let us not crucify him on the cross of our personal ambitions.
I respect all opinions expressed so far, but this is not the time for divisions, this is the time to unite behind the ticket no matter its perceived inadequacies, so that we can continue to deliver for Borno.
Our collective focus should be Borno first, and not who should be in a particular position.
We have no cause to doubt the man who delivered for us, in the face of innitial skepticism, so, let Ali SEMA, be.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2017 Zox News Theme. Theme by MVP Themes, powered by WordPress.