Connect with us

JUDICIARY

Alleged fraud: Lawyers to Maina, co-defendant shun court proceeding

Published

on

Counsel to Abdulrasheed Maina, former Chairman, defunct Pension Reformed Task Team (PRTT) and Maina’s firm, the 2nd defendant in the money laundering trial, on Monday abandoned the court proceeding.

Justice Okon Abang of the Federal High Court, Abuja, where Maina is facing a 12-count charge, made the remark in his ruling on Tuesday.

Our correspondent reports that the EFCC had, on Oct. 25, charged Maina (1st defendant) before the court alongside his firm, Common Input Property and Investment Ltd on money laundering offences.He had, however, pleaded not guilty to all the charges. Our correspondent reports that Justice Abang, had, on Monday, adjourned trial continuation shortly after the court ordered Sen. Ali Ndume, who stood as surety for Maina, to be remanded in Kuje Correctional Centre over his inability to produce the 1st defendant to stand his trial. The court also ordered that the trial should continued in Maina’s absence.

It would be recalled that since the commencement of the case, some lawyers, including Joe Gadzama, SAN; Ahmed Raji, SAN; Afam Osigwe; Adeola Adedipe; Mark Agbo and Francis Oronsaye had argued Maina and his company’s case.

Although Oronsaye appeared for Maina yesterday, no lawyer appeared for the 2nd defendant (his firm).At the resumed hearing today, when the court register called the case, no counsel represented either Maina or his firm. The EFCC’s Lawyer, Mohammed Abubakar, was, however, in court.Abubakar informed the court that the matter was adjourned until today (Nov. 24) for further cross examination of the 6th prosecution witness( PW6) by the counsel to 1st defendant (Maina).He said the counsel was yet to conclude his cross examination and no excuse was offered for his absence.“I, therefore, urge my lord to foreclose further cross examination by counsel to 1st defendant,” he said.On counsel to the 2nd defendant, Abubakar said the lawyer must have abandoned the cross examination of the PW6 because he had not been appearing for the sittings since July 20.In his ruling, the judge noted that counsel to 1st defendant (Maina) crossed examined the PW6 on July 2 before the matter was adjourned for further cross examination of the witness.He said since then till Nov. 24, the counsel that cross examined the witness abandoned proceedings.

The judge, therefore. ordered the closure of further cross examination of PW6 by counsel to Maina.According to him, because he commenced cross examination, the matter is not foreclosed but rather closed.Also, the judge said counsel to the 2nd defendant ought to have been in court on July 20 to know when the matter was adjourned to. He said the lawyer was not in court on Sept. 29, Sept. 30, Oct 2, Oct19, Nov. 18 and Nov. 23 of the adjourned dates and offered no excuse for his absence. “It was further adjourned till today for continuation of trial. “Learned counsel is not in court and offered no excuse for being absence,” he said. According to him, it is my view that he has abandoned proceedings and will have himself to blame.Justice Abang then granted the EFCC’s prayer to foreclose the cross examination of the PW6 by counsel to 2nd defendant.

The judge, who discharged the PW6 from witness box, ordered the prosecution to call the next witness. Two witnesses; one Ali Sani, an Estate Developer in Abuja (PW7) and Ibrahim Abdulkareem, a federal civil servant (PW8), gave their evidence-in-chief before the court. The EFCC’s lawyer urged the court to foreclose the rights of counsel to 1st and 2nd defendants to cross examination the witnesses and it was granted. Justice Abang then adjourned the matter until Nov. 25 , for continuation of trial.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

JUDICIARY

Odinkalu Applauds CJN Kekere-Ekun for Sanctioning Errant Judges

Published

on

By

Professor Chidi Odinkalu, a legal scholar and judicial reform advocate, has praised the Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Justice Kudirat Kekere-Ekun, for her decisive action in addressing misconduct within the judiciary.

The National Judicial Council (NJC) recently sanctioned five judicial officers for professional breaches, including age falsification and other misconducts. The decisions were made during the NJC’s 107th meeting held on November 13 and 14, 2024.

Judges Sanctioned for Misconduct

Among those sanctioned were:

  • Justice Chukwuemeka Chikeka, Chief Judge of Imo State, who was recommended for compulsory retirement effective October 27, 2021. Justice Chikeka was found to have falsified his date of birth, with inconsistencies noted between 1956 and 1958. He was also directed to refund salaries and allowances received after his official retirement date.
  • Hon. Kadi Babagana Mahdi, Grand Kadi of Yobe State, was also recommended for compulsory retirement after discrepancies in his date of birth were discovered. Records showed three different birth dates, while his actual year of birth was determined to be 1952. The NJC found that he should have retired 12 years ago and ordered him to refund salaries and allowances received during this period.
  • Justice G.C. Aguma of Rivers State High Court and Justice A.O. Nwabunike of Anambra State High Court were suspended from duties for one year.

Odinkalu’s Commendation

Reacting to the NJC’s decision, Professor Odinkalu commended the Chief Justice of Nigeria for her swift and decisive response.

“Madam CJN, Kudirat Kekere-Ekun, has acted swiftly on this matter of age falsification by the Chief Judge of Imo State. She has done the right thing the right way,” Odinkalu stated.

He expressed hope that this move would signal a new era of improved judicial standards under Kekere-Ekun’s leadership of the NJC.

NJC’s Commitment to Judicial Integrity

The NJC emphasized its zero-tolerance for misconduct, reiterating its commitment to upholding integrity within the judiciary. The council urged judicial officers to adhere strictly to professional and ethical standards.

The actions taken are seen as a bold step toward restoring public confidence in Nigeria’s judicial system.


Continue Reading

JUDICIARY

Fubara Warns Judges on Conflicting Judgments

Published

on


Rivers State Governor, Siminalayi Fubara, has called on judges and lawyers to avoid delivering conflicting rulings, which he says undermine justice and governance. His warning follows conflicting judgments that nearly disrupted the local government election in the state.

Speaking at the 2024/2025 Legal Year ceremony in Port Harcourt, Fubara criticized legal professionals who compromise their integrity for personal gain. He emphasized the sacred role of the judiciary in upholding justice and urged judges to remain steadfast in truth.

“You are the god that we are seeing. Your position is to stand and defend us,” Fubara stated, adding that those who compromise justice would face severe consequences, both legally and morally.

Fubara praised the Rivers State judiciary, particularly the High Court, for their support in maintaining stability despite external pressures. He acknowledged threats and assaults faced by judicial officers but encouraged them to remain resolute in their pursuit of justice.

In his sermon, Bishop Rt Rev Wisdom Budu Ihunwo echoed the governor’s concerns, highlighting the negative impact of conflicting judgments on Nigeria’s unity and governance. The bishop warned that those responsible for such actions would eventually face divine punishment.

Governor Fubara concluded by emphasizing the need for strong institutions to safeguard democracy and ensure societal prosperity.

Continue Reading

JUDICIARY

You’ve no contract to fix Kwara Hotel, Court tells MM’s Crystal Group

Published

on

By

  • Says govt bears no liability for unsigned agreement

Stephen Olufemi Oni, Ilorin

An Ilorin High Court has struck out a case instituted against the Kwara State Government by the Hon. Moshood Mustapha-owned Crystal Group of Companies Limited over the remodelling of the legacy Kwara Hotel.

Hon. Justice E. B. Mohammed struck out the case after upholding the preliminary objections of the state government on the matter.

The judge said no document was before the court to show that the Crystal Group had any valid contract with the state government to remodel the iconic hotel, shutting down the much-parroted claim that the government had reneged on its commitment with the firm.

The court held that a draft agreement or an unsigned agreement by either of the parties is worthless and cannot cloth Crystal Group of Companies Limited with the legal right to pursue any action against the government regarding Kwara Hotel.

“The claimant’s suit against Kwara State Government on Kwara Hotels is hereby struck out,” the court held, potentially turning the page on the topic.

The government had repeatedly explained that it signed no agreement with the Crystal Group and that whatever talks between them had not reached the level of a legal agreement that is binding on either party.

End

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2017 Zox News Theme. Theme by MVP Themes, powered by WordPress.