Connect with us

News

Private prisons in U.S. tool for pursuing profit

Published

on

By Zhang Bolan, People’s Daily

In the recent nearly four decades, private prisons in the U.S. have been widely denounced and criticized by people from all walks of life for frequent scandals, including exploitation of labor, human rights violations, racial discrimination, and collusion between politicians and operators of private prisons.

Last year, UN human rights experts urged the U.S. to “eliminate all for-profit detention facilities”, saying that “detainees should not become units for profit,” according to an article published on the website of the UN.

In the 1980s, in an effort to ease the burdens on overcrowded public prisons, the U.S. government started to contract some companies to run private prisons and pay them for services. Over the past nearly 40 years, private prisons have expanded rapidly and formed a highly profitable industry and huge lobbying groups.

CoreCivic and the GEO Group, two major private prison operators and also listed companies in the U.S., own and operate more than 100 detention facilities across the country.

According to data released by the website of The Sentencing Project, a Washington-based advocacy group, in 2019, about 116,000 prisoners were held in private prisons in the U.S., representing 8 percent of the country’s total state and federal prison population. Meanwhile, more than 30 states were in partnership with companies running private prisons.

The primary goal of private prisons is to profit from anything they deal in. The profits of private prisons mainly come from government subsidies and forced prison labor, coupled with low operation costs.

There’s often a prison bed occupancy guarantee clause in the contracts between U.S. federal, state, and local governments and private prison operators, which stipulates that the government should guarantee a certain occupancy rate in prison beds; and if failing to reach the rate, it will need to pay compensations to private prison operators.

Meanwhile, to ensure the occupancy rate for their own profits, private prisons try to bribe judicial officials so that they will impose severe sentences for minor offences or extend the term of imprisonment.

An American documentary film titled “Kids for Cash” described a judicial scandal in the U.S. In the film, two former judges in Luzerne County, Pennsylvania, accepted several million U.S. dollars of kickbacks from private prison operators in exchange for giving heavy sentences to juveniles who committed minor offences in the absence of an attorney and sending thousands of juveniles to privately run prisons between 2003 and 2008.

Among those juveniles who were sent to private prisons, the youngest was only 10 years old, and many were first-time offenders who committed minor crimes such as petty theft.

A study conducted by the Washington State University found that private prisons lead to an average increase of 178 new prisoners per million population per year and longer sentences.

The length of sentences also increases when private prisons come into a state, especially in nonviolent crimes that have more leeway in sentencing guidelines, according to the study.

Private prison operators have made big gains from inmate services. According to reports of U.S. media, in 2020, CoreCivic generated $1.9 billion in revenue, 82.2 percent of which came from its private prison operations. In the same year, the revenue of the GEO group reached $2.3 billion.

Most private prisons in the U.S. are ill-equipped. They usually build their facilities to minimum standards required by contracts with governments, in a bid to reduce operating costs. Besides, private prisons are often understaffed and correctional officers there are of varying quality. Furthermore, some private prisons connive in gangsters and bullies “maintaining” order in prisons.

Due to various loopholes in the daily management and security measures, gang activities have been rampant in private prisons, which are also troubled by incidents of violence from time to time.

Data from the U.S. Department of Justice revealed that fight between inmates takes place 65 percent more frequently in private prisons than in public ones, and violent incidents and assaults on guards by inmates are 49 percent more frequent in private prisons than in government-run prisons.

Violence can fall on an inmate at any moment in private prisons in the U.S., according to a book titled “The American Trap”, which described the high incidence of violent incidents in private prisons in the U.S.

Conditions in the cell were deteriorating, and verbal arguments and physical aggression became increasingly frequent, said the book, which was written by Frédéric Pierucci, a former executive of French energy and transport giant Alstom. The management system of private prison was no less than modern slavery, he said.

Private prisons in the U.S. have turned prisoners into modern-day slaves. Private prisons have made criminal sentence become a “pernicious form of servitude” trapped in the service of endlessly increasing profit, the literal revenues of physical toil, suffering, and exploitation, said Laura Appleman, a professor with the College of Law, Willamette University, in her latest research paper titled “Bloody Lucre: Carceral Labor and Prison Profit”.

Inmates in private prisons are forced into high-intensity and long hours of work but are paid far less than the statutory minimum hourly wage in the country. Their basic human rights are hardly guaranteed.

American journalist Shane Bauer had been undercover as a prison guard at a private prison in Winnfield, Louisiana, for four months and wrote his experience in the prison into a book titled “American Prison: A Reporter’s Undercover Journey into the Business of Punishment”.

He exposed chaotic phenomena in the prison, including forced labor, exploitation, violence, maltreatment, and corruption.

In private prisons, inmates are regarded as labor machines and their expenses, such as food and clothing, are often squeezed. These prisons even ignore their needs for medical services and deliberately putting off sending them to the hospital even when they are critically ill, according to the book.

The book provided a penetrating exposé on the cruelty and mind-bending corruption of privately run prisons across the U.S., said a U.S. book review magazine, noting that nearly every page of this tale contains examples of shocking inhumanity.

“A terrifying look into one of America’s darkest and deepest ongoing embarrassments,” commented well-known U.S. literary website Literary Hub on the book.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Court fixes August 27 for hearing in Benue APC candidates’ suit

Published

on

By

A Federal High Court in Abuja has fixed August 27 for definite hearing in a suit filed by aggrieved members of the Benue State chapter of the All Progressives Congress (APC), who are challenging their alleged substitution as validly nominated candidates for the 2027 general election.
Justice Inyang Ekwo adjourned the matter at the instance of counsel to the plaintiffs, Mohammed Ndarani (SAN), who sought time to respond to a preliminary objection filed by the APC, the first defendant, challenging the court’s jurisdiction to hear the suit.

Justice Ekwo directed counsel for the parties to file and exchange their processes before the next adjourned date, warning that any counsel who failed to do so would be personalized.
Matthew Burka appeared for the APC, while the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), the second defendant, was represented by Oluwole Olukunle.
The adjournment followed an earlier order by the court directing the APC and INEC to maintain the status quo in the dispute over candidates who emerged from the party’s Benue State primaries.
The order was made last Thursday during proceedings in Suit No. FHC/ABJ/CS/1429/2026, filed by Engr. Sesugh kaaba and other aggrieved APC candidates from Benue State against the party and the electoral commission.
The plaintiffs, through an ex parte motion filed on July 5, sought six interim reliefs, including an order restraining the APC from substituting its validly nominated candidates through a June 29 correspondence to INEC, or any subsequent communication, pending determination of the substantive suit. They also asked the court to compel the APC to transmit to INEC the names of candidates validly nominated during primaries monitored by the commission.
When the matter first came up on July 8, the court declined to grant the interim application immediately, directing the APC and INEC to appear and respond before any ruling. The matter was adjourned to July 16.
At Thursday’s proceedings, counsel for the APC and INEC were in court, while the plaintiffs were represented by Ndarani and his legal team.
Ruling on the application, Justice Ekwo held that since issues had been joined by the parties — particularly with INEC now before the court the defendants were bound by law to preserve the subject matter of the litigation pending determination of the suit. When plaintiffs’ counsel urged the court to caution the APC and INEC against any action affecting the disputed list of candidates, the judge said it was “not a matter of advice but of law,” stressing that the defendants were bound to maintain the status quo.
The court accordingly restrained the APC and INEC from taking any action capable of altering the disputed list of candidates pending the hearing and determination of the substantive suit. The defendants did not object to the restraining order.
At the commencement of proceedings, the court noted that all parties had voluntarily submitted to its jurisdiction by filing and exchanging their respective processes, and held that there was no procedural or jurisdictional impediment to an expeditious determination of the case. It directed that the matter be heard without further delay.
In furtherance of preserving the res and safeguarding the judicial process, the court ordered all parties to maintain the status quo pending final determination of the suit, restraining any act capable of prejudicing the rights of the parties or rendering the proceedings nugatory. It further directed that INEC be served forthwith with the originating and all consequential processes.
The effect of the subsisting order is that INEC is restrained from tampering with the existing list of candidates and from receiving, recognising, or acting on any purported substituted list of National Assembly candidates from Benue State submitted by the APC.

Continue Reading

News

CONGRATULATION TO HON. GINIKA FLORENCE TOR ON HER APPOINTMENT AS FEDERAL COMMISSIONER, NATIONAL SALARIES, INCOMES AND WAGES COMMISSION

Published

on

By

I, Amb. Tonye Sylvester Iyade, extend my warmest congratulations to Hon. Ginika Florence Tor on her well-deserved appointment as a Federal Commissioner of the National Salaries, Incomes and Wages Commission by His Excellency, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, GCFR.

This prestigious appointment is a clear recognition of Hon. Ginika Florence Tor’s years of dedicated service, unwavering loyalty, competence, and commitment to nation-building. Her appointment reflects the confidence reposed in her ability to contribute meaningfully to the advancement of the Commission’s mandate and the continued progress of our dear nation.

I also wish to express my profound appreciation to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, GCFR.for this thoughtful appointment. It is yet another demonstration that the President values commitment, hard work, capacity, and those who have remained steadfast in supporting and advancing the ideals of the Renewed Hope Agenda. By appointing capable and experienced individuals into strategic positions, the President continues to reinforce his administration’s commitment to good governance, merit, and effective service delivery.

There is no doubt that Hon. Ginika Florence Tor possesses the experience, character, and leadership qualities required to excel in this important national assignment. I am confident that she will discharge her responsibilities with integrity, professionalism, and dedication, while contributing significantly to the realization of the Renewed Hope vision of the Tinubu administration.

As she assumes this important office, I pray that Almighty God grants her wisdom, strength, sound health, and divine guidance to serve Nigeria with excellence and leave behind a legacy of impactful service.

Congratulations once again, Hon. Ginika Florence Tor, on this remarkable and well-deserved appointment. I wish you a successful and rewarding tenure in service to our great nation.

Signed:

Amb. Tonye Sylvester Iyade

Continue Reading

News

Borno Deputy Governorship: Shealting The Swords , Healing The Wounds.

Published

on

By

BY: Inuwa Bwala.

Given the role of a Deputy Governor, it is rather an anathrma to campaign, seeking to be chosen, as a deputy governorship candidate.
Changing dynamics have however seen to the emergence of individuals, openly campaigningy , to be so chosen.
It is a truism that, the choice is the prerogative of the governorship candidate, to nominate someone, he or she feels he or she can blend well.
The case in Borno for the oncoming elections, presents a case study, of people doing things wrongly and expect to alter a long standing narrative.
In the last few days, since Ali Abdullahi, was chosen as the runningmate to Engineer Mustapha Gubio, the polity seems to be getting charged.
I have tried to jaxtapose argumentson the appropriateness or lack of it, in the choice of Ali Abdullahi, as the deputy Governorship candidate of the All Progresdives Congress, APC, in Borno state.
While some justify the choice, others were not too comfortable with it.
To many, there was no sufficient consultations, with critical stakeholders, before the choice was made public.
To others, the candidate was picked from outside the traditional political circle, and yet to others, he is not conversant with the ways of the people, having been born and bred outside the enviroment.
I understand others even feel that the choice negates the expectations of frontrunners in the campaigns, with some people even developing a sense of entitlement, in way.
In as much as everybody os granted the right to aspire, it has never been the norm to consult everybody before a deputy governorship candidate is chosen.
It is normal to try selling the idea, but it is not a must, that the evrntual choice must be someone others feel must be the one.
No matter how anyone feels, there are rooms for a rhendezvous of interests, in a party that controls the government.
And given our peculiar circumstances in Borno, we have to give it to the candidate, to nominate somebody he feels he could blend with, effectively.
That most of the arguments did not center on competence, capacity or value addition of the deputy governorship candidate, leave room for one to surmise that, the conventional practice, rrlies more on atributes, above interest.
I would rather, those who feel slighted to reminiscence, on Ali Abdullahi’s past performances, and not the lack of patronage, or political convenience, on their sides.
The Task Ahead, presupposes that, while Borno is still smarting from years of insecurity, we do not enjoy the luxury of internal political bickerings, which could cause dislocations and possible going into the elections as a divided house.
It is a truism that we need a deputy governor, with requisite administrative experience and technical capacity, to fully compliment the efforts of Engineer Mustapha Gubio, so that together they can hit the ground running reminisceint of the Governor Zulum era. A curious look into Ali Abdullahi’s pedigree, shows that, he brings that capacity, in the same fashion that he demonstrated at SEMA. I have no doubt at the back of my mind, that both governor Zulum and our governorship candidate, Mustapha Gubio, are passionate about the continuity of the Zulum Agenda, hence the choice of Ali SEMA, as he is popularly known.
Taking into consideration the need to live up to the expectations of the people, especially on the need to rebuild Borno, they may have considered changing the course midstream may tend to slow us down.
I know as a matter of fact, that, Ali Abdullahi has been aligned to Zulum’s vision of service, integrity, and results, for a long time.
That the governor has gone out of his way in trying to placate those who may have nursed the ambition of being the ones to be considwred, points to the fact that, the Gubio/Abdullahi ticket was chosen to unite us, not divide us.
I am sure the Governor values every zone, every elder, and every stakeholder, and never intended to shut out anybody. We may recall, that, similar skepticism greeted the emergence of Zulum and Kadafur in 2023, but having seen their best sides, makes Borno the better off for it today.
Shealthing our swords and healing the wounds of this innitial perceibed snub, is a sinquanon to making the choice the best team, we could put forward for Borno.
I am compelled to appeal to all of us to look beyond personal interests and prioritize Borno, even as we strive to deliver. The Governor’s door remains open for dialogue, as always.
Let us rally behind this ticket, and mot risk a divided house that cannot deliver to our people. A united APC in Borno is what our people expect of us.

Let the narrative turn to the choice of Ali Abdullahi as Deputy Governorship candidate is about *competence, continuity, and service to Borno people, and not about how he emerged.
Governor Babagana Umara Zulum with his deputy have showed focus on finishing the work of rebuilding Borno’s destroyed schools, hospitals and roads, and resettling our people. His successor needs a deputy who understands this vission and shares that same commitment.

Ali Abdullahi has the experience, he has demonstrated loyalty, and has showed dedication. Let us not crucify him on the cross of our personal ambitions.
I respect all opinions expressed so far, but this is not the time for divisions, this is the time to unite behind the ticket no matter its perceived inadequacies, so that we can continue to deliver for Borno.
Our collective focus should be Borno first, and not who should be in a particular position.
We have no cause to doubt the man who delivered for us, in the face of innitial skepticism, so, let Ali SEMA, be.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2017 Zox News Theme. Theme by MVP Themes, powered by WordPress.