Connect with us

News

IADI Alleges Plot to Hijack Kafe Green Area Land

Published

on

  • Alleges compromise by FCDA Executive Secretary and staff, using FCT Minister Nyesom Wike’s name to push reallocation for personal gain
  • Urges Wike’s intervention as genuine allottee battles displacement despite ₦300m investment

The Integrity Advocacy for Development Initiative (IADI) has raised alarm over what it described as a plot by senior officials of the Federal Capital Development Authority (FCDA) to hijack the Kafe Green Area in Abuja, despite a pending court case and huge investments already made by the original allottee.

In a statement issued on Sunday, the Executive Director of IADI, Christopher Ofomhi, disclosed that the land was duly allocated to BUNJOA Concept Ltd in 2007, with the company paying ground rent up until 2010.

According to him, the Department of Parks & Recreation confirmed the payments before an embargo was later placed on ground rent collection.
Ofomhi stated that the company had already spent about ₦300 million on compensation and statutory charges, only for the land to be dubiously reallocated by what he described as “corrupt successors of Bukus Achi,” the former Director of Parks & Recreation, allegedly for personal gain. He accused the current FCDA Executive Secretary and some staff members of compromising the process by hiding under the name of FCT Minister Nyesom Wike to push through a reallocation scheme designed to benefit private interests.

Despite the fact that the matter has been in court since 2022, with FCDA lawyers actively participating, Ofomhi revealed that a new company, Tegwa-Tegwanig Ltd, has now emerged, claiming it was engaged by the FCDA to develop a multi-event sports centre on the disputed site.

“This development raises serious questions. What has happened to the genuine allottee who followed due process and invested millions? Why does the FCDA appear to disregard judicial processes and the constitutional rights of Nigerians to own property anywhere in the country? And why is an Executive Secretary in such a hurry to displace the rightful owner without due process or fair compensation?” Ofomhi queried.

The civil society group alleged that some FCDA officials were hiding under the guise of a public project to appropriate the land for personal benefit. It warned that such acts of impunity undermine public trust in government institutions.

IADI therefore called on the FCT Minister, Nyesom Wike, the FCDA leadership, and other relevant authorities to urgently intervene and halt what it described as “the planned hijack of an innocent citizen’s land.”

“Land administration in Abuja must not be reduced to a playground for corruption. Due process must be respected, the courts must be allowed to decide, and citizens must be protected from exploitation,” Ofomhi stressed.

Concluding the statement, IADI emphasized that the matter transcends the interest of one company, describing it as a litmus test for governance credibility and the rule of law in Nigeria.

“As civil society, we cannot stand aloof while a dangerous culture of impunity takes root in the heart of the nation’s capital. If judicial pronouncements and due process are ignored in Abuja, then what hope do ordinary Nigerians have in other parts of the country?” Ofomhi asked.

The group further appealed to the Director General of the State Security Service (DGSS) to prevail on the FCT DSS to conclude its ongoing investigation into the Parks & Recreation Department and ensure that all those found culpable face justice, noting that this will serve as a deterrent to others.

The group also warned that it was prepared, alongside allied civil society organizations, to escalate the matter through lawful civic action, including peaceful demonstrations and public advocacy, until justice is achieved.

“We will stand firmly on the side of justice. This is not just about land, it is about whether Nigerians can trust their government to protect rights and respect the courts. No one is above the law, and we will not relent until accountability prevails,” IADI declared.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Kwara Gov hails Adama on World Junior Swimming Championships medal

Published

on

Stephen Olufemi Oni, Ilorin

Kwara State Governor AbdulRahman AbdulRazaq has congratulated Abdul Jabar Adama, a Kwaran, on his trail-blazing silver medal at the ongoing World Aquatics Junior Swimming Championships in Romania.

Adama clocked 23.64 seconds to win the medal in the men’s 50m Butterfly event final, making the first time any Nigerian has won any medal in a global swimming event.

Governor AbdulRazaq said the win further proves the bonafide of the 17-year-old Adama who recently won two gold medals for Nigeria at the 16th Africa Junior Swimming Championships in Cairo in April and May, 2025.

“We are confident that this is just the start of a career that is destined for the highest honour attainable,” the Governor said in a statement on Sunday.

“We wish Adama, the national swimming sensation, a brighter future in good health and amid increasing national and global recognitions.”

End

Continue Reading

News

Barr. Hamza Raises Alarm on Police Brutality in Borno

Published

on

By

Barrister Hamza N. Dantani, has raised alarm on unlawful engagements by Nigeria police in Borno state.

In a letter addressed to the Borno state Governor Babagana Zulum, the constitutional and human rights lawyer stated that

” As a constitutional lawyer and human rights advocate, I am compelled by recent disturbing happenings regarding the conduct of specific units of the Nigeria Police Force operating within Borno State, particularly the Commander of RRS ( ACP Babalolo Adioye) and the Officer-in-Charge of Cracks Unit. ( ACP Mohammed Ibrahim)”

According to the Human rights advocate “citizens are being arbitrarily arrested in the Maiduguri metropolis without reasonable suspicion of having committed any crime. Disturbingly, after such arrests, these citizens are not charged before a competent court of law as required by the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended). Instead, they are taken to a juvenile facility known as Tandari, where they are unlawfully detained at the pleasure of the authorities without a court order.”

“Even more troubling is the random nature of these arrests, where citizens going about their lawful business are picked up arbitrarily, linked to alleged offences they know nothing about, and confined in this facility without being charged before a court of law. This practice undermines the rule of law and erodes public trust in law enforcement and government institutions.” He stated .

He noted that” the Constitution is clear on the lawful arrest and detention procedure. Section 35(1) guarantees every citizen the right to personal liberty, and subsection (4) stipulates that any person arrested must be brought before a court within a reasonable time. To guide against potential abuse, 35(5) defined the expression “a reasonable time” to mean 24 hours where a court of competent jurisdiction is within a forty-kilometre radius and 48 hours or more extended period as the court may consider reasonable in other circumstances.”

“There’s hardly any police station in Maiduguri without a court of competent jurisdiction within a forty-kilometre radius; nonetheless, this constitutional safeguard is routinely ignored”

“It is pertinent to state that no law vests in the governor or any executive authority the power to direct citizens to be detained in a remand home, juvenile facility, or any other holding facility without a valid court order. Such actions are ultra vires, unconstitutional, and amount to executive overreach in the case of Mil. Gov., Lagos State v. Ojukwu (1986) 1 NWLR (Pt. 18) 621, the court held that disputes as to the legality of acts of government are to be decided by Judges who are independent of the executive”

He pointed out that “the legal framework for establishing remand homes and centres for children in Nigeria includes the Children and Young Persons Act (now Children and Young Persons Laws of various states), the Child Rights Act 2004, and the Borstal Institutions and Remand Centres Act”

“However, all these laws have provided peculiar procedures for treating minors in contact with the law, and no child shall be detained without a valid remand order or conviction by a court’

He Observed that “remanding any child without a valid subsisting court order is inimical to the child’s right to liberty and dignity guaranteed by the Constitution and all the extant laws cited above, particularly the Child Rights Act 2004 (now domesticated as Child Rights Laws of various states)”

“We note also that the location of Tandari (Remand Home) in Maiduguri is around Gamboru near Kasuwan Shanu. The other area, previously around Custom near Shehu Sanda Kyarimi Secondary School, has now been converted to a rehabilitation centre for repentant Boko Haram terrorists. Against this background, it becomes even more alarming that such facilities are being used as arbitrary detention centres for ordinary citizens, in clear violation of both domestic and international human rights standards”

While calling on the state governor, Zulum to as matter of urgency curb the spate of police lawlessness in the state , he commend the efforts of the government saying that” we acknowledge the enormous security challenges facing Borno State and commend your tireless efforts to restore peace and normalcy. However, it is trite that he who comes to equity must come with clean hands. A noble end cannot be pursued through ignoble means.”

“The fight against crime and insecurity must not come at the expense of the constitutional rights of the citizens, which the government is sworn to protect. The three wise men in the case of Dapianlong v. Dariye (2007) 8 NWLR (Pt. 1036) 239 lent their voice to the foregoing when they held that “where the Constitution is torn into shreds by the action or inaction of those who are charged with the responsibility of upholding it, the net result is that a culture of lawlessness is sowed into the psyche of the people. The end does not always justify the means.”

“we are not suggesting that suspected criminals should be shielded from the consequences of their actions. Instead, we insist that due process of law must always be followed. Arrest, investigation, prosecution, and punishment must all flow within the confines of the law, not outside of it. To do otherwise is to replace the rule of law with the rule of discretion, which our democratic order cannot sustain”

“The Supreme Court in the case of Ajuwon v. Gov., Oyo State (2021) 16 NWLR (Pt. 1803) 485 held that “the Nigerian Constitution is founded on the rule of law, the primary meaning of which is that everything must be done according to law.”

“we respectfully urge Your Excellency to:

  1. Direct the cessation of arbitrary arrests and unlawful detentions being carried out by the RRS Commander and OC Cracks, or any other security personnel in the State;
  2. Ensure that all citizens currently detained at Tandari or any other non-custodial facility are either charged adequately before a competent court of law in accordance with constitutional provisions, or released forthwith; and
  3. Reaffirm the government’s commitment to upholding the Constitution and the fundamental rights of citizens, thereby strengthening public confidence in the rule of law.”

“History will remember leaders not only for the development they brought but also for how faithfully they upheld the Constitution and the dignity of citizens.”

“I trust that you will act swiftly to correct these grave violations and realign the actions of law enforcement agencies under your watch with the dictates of democracy, justice, and the rule of law”

Also copied are

Member, National Litigation Committee (Northern Zone) and

Member, Citizens’ Liberty Committee

Nigerian Bar Association (NBA)

Continue Reading

News

STILL ON THE SOWORE, SAHARA REPORTERS’ DIATRIBE.

Published

on


By: Inuwa Bwala
Even with the ethical degeneration in journalism, a good journalist would seek to reflect the what, where, when, who and how, as the basic ingredients of a good story.
I also expect stories to be attributed to reliable and verifiable outlets, or risk credibility crisis.
I have read Sahara Reporters’ highly opiniated and faulty portrayals of situations in Borno and I have also read so many responses to the allusions made against the Government of Borno State, and by implications, the Governor, Professor Babagana Umara Zulum.

It is not in my place to speak for the Government nor the Governor, but I find it necessary to scratch the surface of the ethical breaches in the said report, and perhaps caution on the need for professionalism by people who parade themselves as journalists.
Of course, Nigerians are not strangers to the place of Omoyele Sowore and Sahara Reporters: which he publishes, in the annals of journalism, but to brazenly stand facts on the head, without subjecting same to test, may have crossed the ethical red line and there is the need for caution.
There would not have been the need for rebuttals, but as witnesses to the facts of the true situation of things, one can understand the general anger of citizens and the attendant responses.
The report in question, besides failing to satisfy the basic nuances of journalism, smacks of prejudice against the Government under the leadership of Proffessor Babagana Umara Zulum.
I have not read in it, a statement from security agencies or the government reflecting the other side.
It is needless to state that, given the volatile security situation in Borno and the noticeable innitiatives of the Government to end the menace, the report is not only misleading but entirely negate the facts on ground, nay the spirit of citizens.
Journalism goes beyond sitting down somewhere, and relying on assumptions ostenssibly from pure political mischief makers, in the name of exclusives.
It us doing journalism more harm, to rely on assumptions rather than facts, in reporting a volatile area like Borno.
Quite contrary to the assertions contained in the report, one can confidently say that the said order from Governor Zulum for the arrest of minors protesting under the guise of #EndBadGovernance, were never given, rather, it was a spontaneous response by security agencies, to the apparent hijack of the protest for mischief.
It is a known fact that, those arrested in recent times, were youths, who have self styled themselves as Malians: copying terrorists styles, akin to the situation in Mali.
They were deeply involved in various social vices, including drugs, robbery, rape, abductions and even killings.
The group was an emergent gang that had been causing mischief in Maiduguri by harassing innocent residents.
The chlampdown on them was a big relief to residents of Maiduguri generally. Infact the media had been awash with reports of the atrocities of the group, and I am aware of several appeals made to the Governor, to take decisive steps to put an end to their activities.

On the issu of heavy spending on counter insurgency efforts, it does not seem the report derive facts from records.
I had expected the report to capture figures of the expenditure by the state, on the dis-armament, dis-orientation and re-intergration of repentant Boko Haram members.
But even without that, one may be tempted to ask, which option is more important? Using the Borno model of DDR, which has been acknowledged internationally, as one of the most effective approaches to ending the insurgency, or allowing the insurgents to continue their atrocities?
Having been in Borno since the start of the ibsurgency places people like me in a better position to admit that, with the pragmatic approach of the Borno state Government, in recent times, there is relative peace and stability.
Any journalist in Maiduguri, who have seen all the sides to the conflict, should be responsible enough to say, that, it is not an anathema if the state government spends fortunes to achieve peace.
I am aware of a law banning vandalism and political thuggery in Borno. Complaining about those caught vandalising Government property, amounts to supporting the action. Except if otherwise, Sower has a stake in the trade, I do not see anything wrong in sanctioning those who engage in the act.
I do not want to suspect that, Sowore and Sahara Reporters have an axe to grind with the Government or the Governor. It presupppses therefore, that development journalism should define the approach and not lend our pages to mischief.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2017 Zox News Theme. Theme by MVP Themes, powered by WordPress.