Foreign
Concrete Cooperation Between China and West Africa Accelerates
In recent years, pragmatic cooperation between China and West Africa has grown in both quantity and quality: trade volumes have increased significantly, clean energy and energy projects have been launched, port and transport infrastructure has improved, and agricultural transformation along with technological cooperation has accelerated. At the same time, cultural exchanges and vocational training programs have deepened, laying a strong social foundation for sustainable cooperation.Deepening Trade and InvestmentSenegal’s import and export volume has grown rapidly, from USD 9.26 billion in 2014 to USD 17.69 billion in 2024, an average annual growth rate of 6.7%. In 2024, China overtook France to become Senegal’s largest supplier, marking a new milestone in China–Senegal economic cooperation. The country’s rich natural resources and political stability provide an attractive environment for bilateral trade.In terms of trade structure, Senegal exports specialty agricultural products, refined petroleum products, and minerals. In 2024, China imported USD 747.507 million worth of Senegalese minerals, a dramatic 751.8% increase from the previous year, including raw gold worth 4.653 billion yuan (≈ USD 647 million). Due to limited arable land and an underdeveloped processing industry, the country also imports large quantities of grain and industrial goods; electromechanical equipment, textiles, and consumer goods manufactured in China are among its main imports. In 2024, China’s exports to Senegal totaled 33.697 billion yuan, while imports from Senegal reached 7.749 billion yuan, bringing total bilateral trade to 41.446 billion yuan.China–Nigeria investment cooperation has also produced tangible results. For example, the Ogun Guangdong Free Trade Zone in Nigeria, enjoying tax exemptions, has attracted several technology companies from Zhongguancun; it now hosts 142 enterprises, with cumulative investment reaching USD 2 billion and more than 9,000 jobs created. The zone is home to one of Africa’s largest ceramics companies, Wangkang Ceramics, one of West Africa’s largest glass factories, China Glass, and Nigeria’s largest packaging carton factory, Hewang Packaging.In Nigeria, Chinese companies are shifting from simply undertaking public works projects to engaging in industrial investment, manufacturing, and deeper energy sector participation. Recently, Nigerian officials reported that several Chinese companies had expressed investment intentions or commitments exceeding USD 20 billion in sectors such as agriculture, mining, automobile manufacturing, steel, and energy. Nigerian authorities view these “intentions” as key drivers for industrialization and job creation.In terms of project types, this wave of cooperation combines traditional public works contracts with a growing number of investments targeting local production and “localization”: some companies plan to establish manufacturing plants, processing bases, and on-site mineral resource upgrading facilities. Unlike the old “construction–supply–revenue repatriation” model, the current approach emphasizes local production, local employment, and supply chains anchored within the country. If these intentions materialize into actual investments, they will help boost Nigeria’s manufacturing capacity and increase the share of processed goods in its exports.Vast Prospects in the Energy SectorChina–Africa cooperation in green energy has seen several notable achievements. BYD has launched its “Yuan PLUS” long-range electric vehicle in Dakar, offering residents a more environmentally friendly mobility option. Chinese-made solar streetlights are widely used in rural Senegal, improving public lighting and agricultural production conditions. In Dakar’s Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) network, all 121 articulated 18-meter electric buses are of Chinese origin; the stations and depot are equipped with photovoltaic systems, significantly reducing urban energy consumption.For electrifying remote rural areas, Chinese companies are developing off-grid photovoltaic projects, installing solar plants and distribution networks to bring reliable electricity to households and farms without grid access. The Senegalese government is actively working to optimize its energy mix: President Faye’s energy strategy aims for 40% renewable energy by 2030, a key goal for enhancing energy independence and combating climate change. In recent years, Chinese companies have invested in several photovoltaic power plants in Senegal; projects are growing in scale, and feasibility studies for phase II—including energy storage—have been launched. Some projects even plan to install solar panels along highways to power nearby villages.With abundant sunshine and wind resources in Senegal, and China’s mature expertise in new technologies, the two sides have obvious complementarities and vast cooperation potential.In July 2025, China Energy Engineering Group (CEEC) and other Chinese companies served as the general contractor for the largest biomass power plant under construction in West Africa: the Biaoya biomass plant in Côte d’Ivoire, with a capacity of 46 MW, successfully completed its first power injection—laying the foundation for the progressive start-up of units and grid connection. Located in the Abuissu region, about 100 km east of Abidjan, the project is the largest biomass power plant in the subregion and the first in Côte d’Ivoire. Equipped with two 23 MW steam turbine units, it will use palm oil industry waste (leaves and stems) as fuel. During construction and operation, the project is expected to create over 1,000 jobs and provide supplementary income for about 12,000 palm growers. Once operational, it will produce about 348 million kWh per year—enough to meet the annual electricity demand of about 1.7 million people—and reduce CO₂ emissions by about 180,000 tons per year, contributing to sustainable energy and local socio-economic development.Infrastructure and Development Projects to Improve Living ConditionsThe Simandou iron ore deposit in western Guinea is one of the world’s largest and highest-quality yet-to-be-exploited reserves: proven reserves exceed 2.25 billion tons, with total resources possibly reaching 5 billion tons, and an iron content of 66–67%, ranking among the best globally. Once fully developed, the deposit could allow annual exports of up to 120 million tons. Currently, Chinese groups led by China Communications Construction Company (CCCC, Port and Navigation / China Harbour Engineering Company) are working to establish the necessary logistics for transporting the ore.The Simandou port project, located at the mouth of the Marébayah River, is being built by China Harbour and has been progressing steadily since construction began in September 2023. Once completed, this terminal will be the main export hub for Simandou ore, boosting mining operations and contributing significantly to Guinea’s economic and social development as well as to global iron ore supply stability.During construction, companies have taken on social responsibilities: in a nearby fishing village, residents once suffered from isolation and poor road conditions. “Before, our paths were just dirt; when it rained, everything turned muddy and we couldn’t move around. Our farm produce couldn’t leave, and essential goods couldn’t come in,” recalls Mamadou, a septuagenarian fisherman. Thanks to the Simandou port project, the construction team built a wide road to the port and helped repair internal village roads. “Today, we have a ‘road to prosperity’; travel is easier and our goods can reach farther markets,” he says with a broad smile.The Friendship Port in Mauritania, built by Chinese companies and operational since 1986, handles over 90% of the country’s imports and is a key pillar of the national economy—often called “Mauritania’s lung.” With local economic growth, the existing docks became insufficient. With China’s continued support, the port was expanded: in 2014, China Road and Bridge Corporation (CRBC) built docks 4 and 5, increasing capacity from 0.9 million tons to 6 million tons. According to commercial director Ahmedou Gaid, the port’s traffic in 2024 reached 6.12 million tons, with container throughput of 230,000 TEUs, accounting for about 80% of the country’s foreign trade and making a strong contribution to national economic development.Rich and Varied Cultural ExchangesIn July 2025, Nigeria’s national radio launched the program Ni Hao, China (“Hello, China”) in Abuja. Present at the inauguration were Chinese Ambassador to Nigeria Yu Dunhai, Director-General of the Federal Radio Corporation of Nigeria (FRCN) Brama, service heads, staff, and journalists. In his speech, Ambassador Yu noted that 2026 will be the “Year of China–Africa Cultural Exchanges”; thus, the launch of this program is timely and will offer Nigerians a new platform to learn Chinese and discover China, strengthening public support for bilateral economic cooperation and consolidating the China–Nigeria strategic partnership.Founded in 1978, FRCN broadcasts nationwide and remains a major source of information for the population, reaching more than 200 million potential listeners. Ni Hao, China began airing on July 16 and is broadcast every Wednesday from 17:00 to 17:30 nationwide. The program combines Chinese language lessons with segments on China’s economy, technology, society, and culture, giving Nigerians a fresh and diverse window into China.Sino-African artistic exchanges are also notable. In April 2025, the percussion ensemble of China’s Central Conservatory of Music toured Senegal. At a concert in Dakar’s Grand National Theatre, Senegal’s Doudou N’Diaye Rose ensemble performed traditional sabar rhythms, while the Chinese group played percussion pieces such as Drum Poem and Hundred Birds Singing. Conductor Mustafa N’Diaye remarked: “We greatly enjoyed the performance of Chinese percussion… The drum is not just an instrument, it’s a form of cultural transmission.” Professor Yin Fei (from the Chinese side) noted that, like African percussion, Chinese percussion has a rich history; the fusion of the two styles brings shared joy and power. Both sides expressed their desire to strengthen artistic and academic exchanges so that culture can help bring people closer together.Upgrading Agricultural CooperationCôte d’Ivoire is the world’s largest cocoa producer, accounting for about 40% of global production. In 2024, Ivorian production reached nearly 2 million tons, with over 1.4 million tons exported; however, the local processing rate remained low (about 30%). In June 2025, the Abidjan cocoa processing plant—built by Nanning Design & Engineering Co., Ltd, a Chinese light industry company—was officially handed over. Located in PK24, northwest of Abidjan, the plant covers about 21 hectares; it has a processing capacity of 50,000 tons per year and storage capacity of 140,000 tons, making it the largest cocoa bean storage center owned by Côte d’Ivoire. Previously, around 15 large-scale processing plants existed in the country, but most were foreign-owned, with the chocolate and processing markets dominated by Western companies. Now, Côte d’Ivoire has its own large-scale processing unit and storage center, strengthening its voice in the global cocoa market.In Guinea-Bissau, traditional production methods limit agricultural development, and rice productivity remains low. In June 2025, China’s 12th agricultural expert team on a technical assistance mission organized a high-yield rice cultivation training course in the central Bafatá region, bringing together over 210 agricultural officials, farmers, and technicians from across the country.During the training, Chinese experts adapted their teaching to local conditions and farming practices, explaining all steps—from nursery preparation and field management to integrated pest and disease control. In field demonstrations, rice expert Liao Zuoyi held rice ears in his hands while explaining key technical points to participants: “Our goal is not just to increase yields, but to teach farmers sustainable production methods. Only strong roots allow rice fields to resist lodging and achieve high yields.”Biyoï, a farmer from Oio region, said: “Before, we farmed using traditional methods and depended on the will of the skies. Today, thanks to these modern rice cultivation techniques, farmers hold the key to success.” Zheng Junjie, head of the 12th Chinese agricultural expert mission in Guinea-Bissau, stated: “It’s better to teach someone to fish than to give them fish. We hope these techniques, like seeds, will take root in Guinea-Bissau and benefit more farmers.”
Foreign
Jointly safeguarding hard-won outcomes of China-U.S. trade talks
By Zhong Sheng, People’s Daily
On Oct. 25 and 26 local time, China and the United States held a new round of economic and trade consultations in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Guided by the important consensuses reached by the two heads of state in their phone conversations since the beginning of this year, the two sides had candid, in-depth and constructive exchanges of views on important trade and economic issues of mutual concerns, and reached basic consensuses on arrangements to address respective trade concerns.
These outcomes did not come easily. They once again demonstrate that while it is natural for two major countries like China and the U.S. to have differences on economic and trade matters, these differences can be properly handled and the two sides can find the right way to get along as long as the two sides sit down for talks based on equality and constructiveness.
This round of consultations covered a wide range of topics, including the U.S. Section 301 measures on China’s maritime, logistics and shipbuilding sectors, extension of the suspension of reciprocal tariffs, fentanyl-related tariff and law enforcement cooperation, trade in agricultural products, and export controls.
These are issues of mutual concern that also bear on the stability of global industrial and supply chains. The two sides agreed to work out specific details and follow the domestic approval processes of each side.
While each side has long-term interests and concerns at stake, neither allowed these differences to obscure the bigger picture. Both remained solution-oriented, continued to make full use of the China-U.S. economic and trade consultation mechanism, and worked to create conditions for ultimately resolving issues. Such efforts not only help ease concerns but also benefit the development of both countries and the global economy as a whole.
To properly manage differences and advance cooperation, the most important task is to faithfully implement the important consensus reached between the two heads of state.
Since the beginning of this year, Chinese President Xi Jinping and U.S. President Donald Trump have held several phone conversations, setting the tone and direction for improving and developing China-U.S. relations.
Under this guidance, the two countries’ economic and trade teams have held five rounds of consultations and reached positive understandings. This fully demonstrates that to ensure the two giant ships of China and the U.S. sail forward together without veering off course or losing speed, it is essential to unwaveringly adhere to the strategic guidance of the two heads of state, fully implement the important consensus they have reached, and uphold the principles of mutual respect, peaceful coexistence, and win-win cooperation.
The economic and trade relations between China and the U.S. are mutually beneficial and win-win in nature. Cooperation benefits both sides, while confrontation harms both – a truth repeatedly proven over decades of bilateral relations.
Maintaining the stable development of China-U.S. economic and trade relations serves the fundamental interests of both countries and peoples, and meets the expectations of the international community. Looking back at the five rounds of consultations, each positive signal from the talks has brought a welcome warmth to global markets.
As a responsible major country, China has demonstrated composure and wisdom, advocating a broad vision and a sense of responsibility in handling China-U.S. relations, firmly opposing “decoupling and severing supply chains,” and working to safeguard the security and stability of global industrial and supply chains.
The U.S. side, for its part, has repeatedly stated that “it has no intention to decouple from China” and that “the U.S.-China economic and trade relationship is the most influential bilateral relationship in the world.”
With such a common understanding in place, the two sides should move toward each other, cherish every outcome achieved through consultations, build mutual trust, manage differences, and keep China-U.S. economic and trade relations on a steady, long-term path of mutually beneficial cooperation.
On its modernization journey, China remains committed to expanding high-standard opening up, which will create more opportunities for countries around the world, including the United States.
The recently concluded fourth plenary session of the 20th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China reviewed and approved the proposals for formulating the 15th Five-Year Plan, outlining the blueprint for China’s development in the next five years.
From a long-term perspective, China’s pursuit of socialist modernization is a step-by-step historical process of continuous advancement. By pursuing progress while ensuring stability, China can counter any external challenge with the certainty provided by its own development.
The plenary session emphasized the need to expand opening up at the institutional level, safeguard the multilateral trading system, and promote broader international economic flows. It also stressed the need to advance reform and development through greater openness and seek to share opportunities and achieve common development with the rest of the world.
The international community generally believes that, amid today’s uncertainties, China’s formulation and implementation of medium- and long-term plans demonstrate strategic foresight and strong stability, injecting valuable certainty into global development.
The hard-won outcomes of this round of consultations should be jointly cherished and safeguarded. China and the U.S. have both the capability and wisdom to find a path toward coexistence and common prosperity.
When dialogue replaces confrontation and cooperation transcends differences, the two countries can find appropriate ways to address each other’s concerns, promote the healthy, stable, and sustainable development of their economic and trade relations, and deliver greater benefits to the peoples of both nations and the wider world.
(Zhong Sheng is a pen name often used by People’s Daily to express its views on foreign policy and international affairs.)
Foreign
The historical significance and global implications of Taiwan’s restoration to China
By Wang Yingjin
This year marks the 80th anniversary of Taiwan’s restoration to China. On October 25, 1945, at Taipei’s Zhongshan Hall, the representative of the Chinese government solemnly proclaimed that, as of that day, Taiwan and the Penghu Islands had officially been restored to China, and all land, people and administration were put under Chinese sovereignty.
This marked the end of half a century of Japanese colonial occupation and the island’s return to the embrace of the motherland.
For China, Taiwan’s restoration extended beyond territorial recovery. It symbolized the Chinese nation’s rebirth after a century of humiliation inflicted by foreign aggression.
Beginning with the Opium War, China endured repeated incursions and territorial losses. The forced cession of Taiwan and the Penghu Islands following the First Sino-Japanese War in 1895 left an indelible scar on the nation’s collective memory. Their return in 1945 not only erased the humiliation of the Treaty of Shimonoseki but also marked a significant step toward the restoration of national dignity.
Taiwan’s restoration was the fruit of the Chinese people’s unwavering struggle to defend national sovereignty and territorial integrity. Since ancient times, Taiwan has been an inalienable part of the Chinese territory. In 1895, the Japanese government forced the defeated Qing government to cede Taiwan and the Penghu Islands, placing them under colonial rule for half a century and compromising China’s southeastern maritime defenses. The restoration of Taiwan rectified this historical injustice and brought China’s territorial sovereignty back to its rightful state.
Taiwan’s restoration also strengthened Chinese national unity. Despite prolonged occupation, cross-strait bonds endured. During the Chinese People’s War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression, more than 50,000 patriotic Taiwanese crossed the Strait to join their compatriots on the Chinese mainland in the fight against the invaders. The solidarity forged in this shared struggle became a powerful source of collective strength, contributing to national defense and postwar reconstruction.
From a global perspective, Taiwan’s restoration was an important outcome of the victory of the World Anti-Fascist war and an essential component of the postwar international order. It epitomized the triumph of the international anti-fascist united front and recognized China’s critical role as the main Eastern battlefield, where it fought for 14 years and made immense sacrifices in defense of human civilization and world peace. Allied support for Taiwan’s return to China acknowledged these sacrifices and reflected the anti-fascist coalition’s collective will.
The postwar international order legally mandated this restoration. Documents such as the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Proclamation, both carrying legal force under international law, explicitly required Taiwan’s return to China. The principles enshrined in these documents were later institutionalized through the establishment of the United Nations, built on core notions of “sovereign equality” and “non-interference in internal affairs.” Taiwan’s restoration served as a tangible manifestation of these principles and the postwar consensus.
The restoration of Taiwan also confirmed at the international level the illegitimacy of colonial rule. Together, the Cairo Declaration, the Potsdam Proclamation, and the Japanese Instrument of Surrender form a complete legal framework in international law, stipulating that territories seized through aggression must be returned to their rightful owners. This marked a decisive break from the imperialist logic of “might makes right” and helped enshrine a new norm for resolving territorial issues in the postwar world.
Today, as the world undergoes profound changes unseen in a century and the situation across the Taiwan Strait grows increasingly complex, commemorating the 80th anniversary of Taiwan’s restoration holds significant practical significance. It is essential to acknowledge the historical importance of this event in the process of the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation and its lasting impact on the postwar international order.
On the one hand, such commemoration helps evoke the shared historical memory across the Taiwan Strait, strengthen national unity, and consolidate collective strength for national rejuvenation. On the other hand, it serves to reaffirm historical facts and counter the false narrative of the so-called “undetermined status of Taiwan” fabricated through U.S.-Taiwan collusion.
For the Chinese nation, Taiwan’s restoration stands as unequivocal historical evidence against the separatist fallacies of “Taiwan independence.” The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) authorities’ distortion of textbooks, glorification of Japanese colonial rule, and promotion of “de-Sinicization” represent a deliberate departure from the historical truth of Taiwan’s restoration.
For the international community, Taiwan’s restoration exposes the absurdity of the so-called “undetermined status” narrative. Foundational international legal instruments such as the Cairo Declaration and Potsdam Proclamation clearly affirm China’s sovereignty over Taiwan. Taiwan’s return to China in 1945 is an undeniable historical fact. Any attempt to challenge this fact not only denies the victory of World War II but also undermines the integrity of the postwar international order.
(Wang Yingjin is the director of the cross-Strait relations research center of the Renmin University of China.)
Foreign
Three observations on China’s top 500 enterprises
By Zhang Boling
The recent release of the annual list of China’s top 500 Chinese enterprises not only highlights the increasing scale and quality of Chinese firms, but also the resilience and vitality of the country’s high-quality economic development.
For the 23rd consecutive year, the entry threshold for the list has risen. This year, 267 companies reported annual revenues exceeding 100 billion yuan ($14.04 billion), while 15 surpassed the 1 trillion yuan mark.
As primary economic actors, enterprises drive job creation, propel innovation, and shape industrial advancement. Serving as sector leaders, China’s top 500 enterprises function as a key indicator of broader economic performance.
What sets this year’s data apart? Three notable trends offer insight into the underlying momentum of China’s economic transformation.
China’s market vitality is reinforced by dual-engine growth from both state-owned and private enterprises.
Among the top 500 companies, ownership distribution shows near parity: 251 state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and 249 private firms. This equilibrium reflects the complementary strengths of both models and demonstrates China’s adherence to its established policy of “unswervingly consolidating and developing the public sector while actively encouraging, supporting and guiding the non-public sector.”
SOEs continue to drive strategic advancements: CRRC Corporation Limited pioneers high-end rail technology, with the CR450 trainset establishing new global benchmarks. State Grid Corporation of China is constructing next-generation power system to support the transition to renewable energy. These initiatives underscore the strategic role SOEs play in critical sectors tied to national development and public welfare.
Meanwhile, private enterprises are injecting vitality into emerging industries. Automakers like BYD are driving innovation and leading global new energy vehicle (NEV) sales, while internet technology companies are transforming consumer behavior and supply chain ecosystems through digital innovation. The collaborative and competitive dynamics between SOEs and private firms enhance China’s overall capacity for innovation and resilience.
Synergy between manufacturing and services is redefining industrial competitiveness in China.
Revenue data shows a balanced economic structure: manufacturing contributed 40.48 percent and services 40.29 percent to the total revenue of the top 500 enterprises. This near-parity debunks the traditional view that manufacturing and services compete for dominance, instead demonstrating how manufacturing provides the foundation while services enhance value.
High-end equipment manufacturing has created demand for specialized services such as industrial design and operational management. Meanwhile, the booming NEV sector is fostering new business models in battery recycling and intelligent connectivity, opening a broad space for service-sector growth.
At the same time, digital technologies are accelerating the transformation of traditional manufacturing toward smart production. Supply chain finance is alleviating capital constraints for small and medium-sized enterprises, while upgraded logistics networks support lean operations and real-time delivery, enabling “zero inventory” manufacturing. The integration of manufacturing and services is creating a more efficient and globally competitive industrial system.
Coordinated domestic and international development expands growth potential.
The entry threshold for the 2025 list of the top 500 Chinese enterprises has risen by 11.76 percent from last year, while the overseas assets of listed companies reached 11.96 trillion yuan. The steadily rising transnational index of these firms, combined with solid domestic performance, reflects a development model that balances strong domestic development with expanding overseas presence.
Chinese companies are no longer simply exporting products but exporting value by embedding themselves deeper into global industrial chains. Smartphone manufacturers such as VIVO and Transsion have established significant market shares in emerging markets. This international expansion strengthens domestic development by building more resilient supply chains and enhancing industrial competitiveness.
This dual approach – anchored in domestic stability and bolstered by global engagement – enables Chinese enterprises to maintain strategic momentum amid global uncertainties.
From the complementary roles of public and private enterprises, to the convergence of manufacturing and services, and the interplay between domestic strength and international expansion, China’s top enterprises are powering the country’s economic transformation.
Looking ahead, continued optimization of resource allocation and stronger collaborative innovation will further empower Chinese companies to grow and lead industrial transformation, driving China’s economy steadily along the path of high-quality development.
-
Uncategorized5 years agoFG, states urged to harness flooding for ranching, others with technology – Agbaje
-
Headlines10 years agoBreaking: EFCC seals Borno House of Assembly, as Hon members take to their heels
-
News11 years agoNigeria Security Operatives Stage Manhunt For Homosexual Perpetrator
-
News9 years agoHow 21-year-old Girl fled community over accusation of lesbianism
-
News10 years agoYobe Gov Moves Against Deputy
-
Opinion6 years ago7 signs she has friend zoned you
-
Technology4 years ago
Online job placement company headhunts women
-
Headlines9 years agoBorno Dep Gov Abducts Another Church Leader
