Foreign
Global voices and the criminalization of Chinese entrepreneurs

By Dr. Austin Maho
In the August 31, 2021, article in the “Global Voices” an online publication. there was a piece by one Nwachukwu Egbunike title: “Chinese firms in Nigeria face widespread labour abuse allegations, tainting bilateral relationship”
This piece is a response to the article, because it falls within the growing spat of misinformation about China and the Chinese which is fuelled mostly by Western-sponsored media misinformation and propaganda.
A response is appropriate to the convoluted and one sided article to correct his misrepresentation of facts.
Moreover, the outbreak of the coronavirus has led to an increase in “sinophobia”. It is a season of Chinese bashing, pulling China down and looking to humiliating the Asian giant by all means necessary has become the past time of many paid hack writers and media platforms who have no respect for the ABC of journalism that is: Accuracy Balance and Clarity.
The entire article is a well-worn out rehash of conjectures, hearsays and tittle-tattle. The central thesis of the article is that Chinese companies operating in Nigeria too often mistreat, exploit, and abuse their Nigerian staff and condemn them to working in slavish conditions. He also Accuses the Nigerian government of rarely taking action against these abuses, because of its debt obligations to China which has “tainted bilateral relations” .
These allegations he says, are “shared in Nigerian newspapers and on social media by reporters, witnesses, and others” Which according to him “together build a narrative that paints Chinese factory owners and business people in Nigeria as abusive and indifferent to the health and rights of their employees” .
The key words here are “build a narrative” that is being shared in Nigerian newspapers and on social media.
However, to build a “narrative” does not equate to fact. As a journalist one would have expected that Nwachukwu Egbunike would have taken up the challenge to do a proper and independent investigation of these “narratives” to establish their varacity or otherwise rather he chosed to regurgitate these self same narratives to build his own narrative without saying anything new in a predetermined ploy to hoodwink the unsuspecting.
Allegations of Forced Labour
At the peak of the Covid-19 pandemic when the world was not yet sure of what it was dealing with, the Chinese community in Nigeria saved lives, they feed the hungry, clothed the destitute, brought succour to the sick made medical donations to empty hospitals, provided funds, and expertise to built isolation centres among others. The Chinese government, busines mogul like Ali Baba, the CCECC at one point or the other sent plane load of life saving medical supplies to the Nigerian people.
People were told to stay in one place as one of the preventive protocols because when people move the virus moves which was a significant aid to the spread of the virus.
The Chinese were able to stem the spread of the virus through adent adherence to protocols and rigid dicipline. It is that same dicipline they brought to bear in their operations and facilities in Nigeria.
The dictum was simple: If you want to go home, go home, but if you want to stay and work stay and work, not roaming in and out putting others at risk.
How ridiculous does it sound that a full grown man can be held against his will, in his own country to work in a “slave like condition” in a factory owned by a foreigner!
Such statements deminishes the free spirit and independent mindedness of an average Nigerian. The truth is that it was a choice and many opted to stay and earn a pay.
For christ’s sake the World was dealing with an unknown virus that as at then had no cure or vacinne, people were dying in their thousands and palpable fear was spreading across the world and you expected people not to act in their best interest to protect themselves and those entrusted in their care?
The writer accused some Chinese owned companies operating in Nigeria of forced labour at the peak of the covid-19 pandemic.
Nwachukwu specifically mentioned, Goodwill ceramic, a Chinese couple in Abuja, and the Inner Galaxy Steel company. He however avers that “not every allegation has been proven”, in any case he still used the cases together with posts and tweets by faceless and unverified individuals as evidence of unfair labour practices which is rather curious.
Inner Galaxy steel company for instance is arguably the biggest factory in the entire South- East region of Nigeria providing direct and indirect employment to thousands of Nigerians.
The company has positively impacted its immediate community through aggressive corporate social responsibility (CSR) obligations, to their host community with whom they have lived in peace and tranquility for several years.
While Nwachukwu failed to mention that the company gave out Covid-19 palliatives worth millions of naira to its surrounding communities at the height of Covid-19 pandemic he went at length over events that have been proven to be mere fabrications.
He failed to mentioned that the over one thousand workers of the company earn more than the federal government approved minimum wage and that even while the country was on lockdown they continued to pay staff who decided to remain at home.
The talk of forced labour was peddled for mischief. The evidence in the public domain is that Inner Galaxy Steel company signed agreement with employees who were willing to stay and work, and those who were willing to stay agreed on their own accord to abide by the epidemic prevention regulations as issued by the Nigeria Centre for Disease Control, NCDC,
Wages were raised as attested to by the workers themselves. The average worker’s salary doubled, far exceeding the minimum wage set by the federal and state governments in Nigeria.
Temporary accommodation was provided and later upgraded to permanent structures for the comfort of the workers who chosed to stay in the company facility.
The workers were given free meals including free health care and Covid-19 protective gears. It is as a result of the proper prevention measures that no staff of the company contracted the virus.
These efforts have been acknowledged by its workers, ocal communities and state governments.
Should such company be condemned or commended? Nwachukwu did a shoddy report,, he didn’t even border to represent the views of workers of the company or host community but yet reached a conclusion. Certainly that falls short of the time tested tradition of Accuracy, Balance and Clarity in journalism.
The Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (FCCPC) operatives which visited the company in an on-the-spot assessment of the allegations of unfair labour practices against the company exempted the company of all allegations leveled against it, including the Abia State government which set up a committee on the matter. These are information in the public domain which Nwachukwu ignorantly or mischeviously ignored.
TAINTED BILATERAL RELATIONSHI BETWEEN CHINA AND NIGERIA
Nwachukwu Egbunike believes the Nigerian government is unable to act as a result of its heavy indeptedness to China which has tainted bilateral relationship between both countries.
The fact, however, is that many people who express reservations about Chinese loans rely on hearsay and propaganda and have failed to do their own independent research on the subject.
All Chinese loans in Nigeria are tied to projects. The most unbiased, research-based and independent report on the subject of Chinese loans is contained in the June 2020 report of the “China Africa Research Initiative (CARI)” at the Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS) or SAIS-CARI.
The peer-reviewed report concludes that “Chinese loans are not currently a major contributor to debt distress in Africa”.
Additionally, in a 2019 peer-reviewed research paper on the subject, Johns Hopkins professor Deborah Brautigam wrote, “The evidence so far shows that the drumbeat of alarm about Chinese banks’ funding of infrastructure across the BRI (Belt and Road Initiative) and beyond is overblown.”
She believes it was Trump’s Presidency agenda to demarket China.
Irrespective of these reports even by a top-rated Western institution, people, including journalists that should know better refuse to seek the truth for themselves and continues to brandish the debt trap argument.
Furthermore, report by the Debt Management Office of Nigeria shows that as at the end of 2020, the total borrowing by Nigeria from China was USD3.121 billion. This amount represents only 3.94% of Nigeria’s total public debt of USD79.303 billion.
This data shows that China is not a major source of funding for the Nigerian Government and as such cannot wield the influence over the Nigerian government and its officials that Nwachukwu Egbunike spoke about even if it wants to
Chinese government foreign policy as everyone knows has always been based on the policy of non interference on the internal affairs of other nations.
This policy of non-interference was captured by Chinese President Xi Jinping in 2018 during the FOCAC Beijing Summit 2018
“We respect Africa, love Africa and support Africa. We follow a “five-no” approach in our relations with Africa: no interference in African countries’ pursuit of development paths that fit their national conditions; no interference in African countries’ internal affairs; no imposition of our will on African countries; no attachment of political strings to assistance to Africa; and no seeking of selfish political gains in investment and financing cooperation with Africa.”
The world is in the cusps of anti-intellectualism. Intellectuals who ought to bear the torch of enlightenment have themselves become hired pens, spin doctors of misinformation and half-truths.
Since establishment of diplomatic relations between Nigeria and China in 1971 the relationship has grown steadily. China is today considered as one of Nigeria’s closest allies and bilateral partners. China is also one of Nigeria’s important trading and export partners.
According to a 2014 BBC World Service Poll, 80% of Nigerians view China’s influence positively, with only 10% expressing a negative view, making Nigeria the most pro-Chinese nation in the world. If Nigerians feel different it would have been reflected in the independent poll conducted by the BBC.
It is important that journalists and Nigerians in general should desist from allowing themselves to be used to propagate the virulent hatred currently being exhibited against China as a result of the global geopolitical struggle for supremacy between the East and the West.
The infractions of a few should not be used to tar the image of the many law abiding Chinese citizens living in Nigeria and contributing in no small measure to national development.
That some Nigerians and worst still journalists are ready to believe the very worst of allegations against Chinese business men without seeking or obtaining verifiable evidence, should be deprecated and condemned by all well-meaning people.
Opinion is free but facts are sacred. “Global Voices” which presents itself as pan global news outlet should have done more investigative journalism rather allow its space to be used to publish wild allegations and misinformation.
The writer, Dr. Austin Maho is a lecturer at the International Institute of Journalism, and publisher Daybreak newspaper. A weekly newspaper based in Abuja
Foreign
Japan must face consequences for dangerous provocations on Taiwan question
By Zhong Sheng, People’s Daily
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi recently made public remarks suggesting the possibility of military intervention in the Taiwan Strait, grossly interfering in China’s internal affairs. Despite repeated representations from China, she has refused to repent for her blatant and provocative rhetoric, which represents a blatant violation of the one-China principle and the guiding principles set forth in the four China-Japan political documents. Her actions have gravely undermined the political foundation of China-Japan relations and severely offended the sentiments of the Chinese people.
Assertions by a handful of Japanese politicians that China is “overreacting” to Takaichi’s erroneous comments are a misrepresentation of facts and a deliberate attempt to discredit China’s legitimate and reasonable position. The Taiwan question bears directly on the political foundation of mutual trust between China and Japan.
In 1972, the two countries signed the Sino-Japanese Joint Statement and officially established diplomatic relations, which states that the Government of Japan fully understands and respects this stand of the Government of the People’s Republic of China, and it firmly maintains its stand under Article 8 of the Potsdam Proclamation. In 1978, the two countries signed the Treaty of Peace and Friendship Between China and Japan, which affirmed the principles and contents of the joint statement in legal terms and set out the legal parameters for China-Japan relations.
In 1998, the two sides released the China-Japan Joint Declaration on Building a Partnership of Friendship and Cooperation for Peace and Development, in which Japan undertook to “continue to maintain its stand on the Taiwan question which was set forth in the Sino-Japanese Joint Statement” and “reiterated its understanding that there is one China.”
In 2008, the China-Japan Joint Statement on All-round Promotion of Strategic Relationship of Mutual Benefit stipulated clearly in Article 5 that “The Japanese side reiterated that it will continue to abide by its position on the Taiwan question stated in the Sino-Japanese Joint Statement.”
The above is what is laid out in the four political documents between China and Japan regarding the Taiwan question. It constitutes the solemn commitment made by the Japanese government and has a legal effect under international law. There is no room whatsoever for ambiguity or misinterpretation. Whichever political party or person is in power in Japan, they must always abide by the commitment of the Japanese government on the Taiwan question.
Takaichi’s statements fundamentally contravene the guiding principles set forth in these political documents and strike at the foundation of the China-Japan bilateral relationship. As the leader of a country, she should have exercised basic political responsibility and worked with China to promote the sound development of bilateral relations. Instead, shortly after expressing a commitment to the position outlined in the 1972 Sino-Japanese Joint Statement, she irresponsibly claimed that a “Taiwan contingency” could be a “survival-threatening situation” for Japan and implied that Japan may invoke the so-called right to collective self-defense to interfere militarily in the Taiwan Strait.
Such rhetoric is deeply corrosive to the political foundation of China-Japan relations. It reflects provocative strategic intentions and poses a serious threat to peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait and in the region. No sovereign nation can tolerate such flagrant interference in its internal affairs or accept threats of military action from foreign leaders.
Takaichi must take direct responsibility for the political damage her remarks have caused. The only responsible course for the Japanese side is to confront its historical and bilateral obligations with sincerity, cease inflammatory behavior, retract the erroneous statements, and take concrete steps to honor its commitments to China.
A sound and stable China-Japan relationship serves the interests of the Japanese people. Undermining bilateral ties not only runs counter to the prevailing regional and global trends but also lacks public and political support.
In recent days, the extreme and provocative moves of the Takaichi administration have triggered widespread criticism from insightful voices within Japan. Takakage Fujita, secretary-general of the Association for Inheriting and Propagating the Murayama Statement, stated that Takaichi’s remarks violate international law and inflict serious harm on bilateral relations. An editorial in The Tokyo Shimbun criticized her comments as “reckless and careless,” emphasizing that such statements are unacceptable from a sitting prime minister.
Numerous Japanese netizens have bluntly questioned Takaichi’s diplomatic competence, urging her to retract her misguided remarks. Some Japanese people have even organized demonstrations to protest her irresponsible and provocative behavior. Japanese politicians should take these rational voices seriously and refrain from further escalating tensions along a dangerous trajectory.
On matters of fundamental principle, the Chinese people remain unwavering. The Taiwan question lies at the very heart of China’s core interests. Any attempt to challenge this red line will be firmly opposed by the more than 1.4 billion Chinese people and the entire Chinese nation.
This year marks the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Chinese People’s War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression and the World Anti-Fascist War, as well as the 80th anniversary of Taiwan’s restoration to China.
As a former aggressor that inflicted innumerable atrocities in Taiwan, Japan bears a historical responsibility to reflect deeply on its past and exercise heightened caution in its approach to the Taiwan question. Aligning with forces that seek to divide China runs counter to the prevailing trend of peace and development. Should Japan persist in this course, it will inevitably bear the consequences of its actions.
(Zhong Sheng is a pen name often used by People’s Daily to express its views on foreign policy and international affairs.)
Foreign
Bamboo innovation drives low-carbon development in E China’s Anhui
By Han Lei, People’s Daily
In Chizhou, east China’s Anhui province, bamboo is emerging as a sustainable alternative in daily life. Products traditionally made from plastic, such as straws, ice cream sticks, disposable chopsticks, and cutlery, are increasingly being replaced by bamboo-based alternatives.
At a manufacturing facility in the Chizhou High-Tech Industrial Development Zone, automated production lines produce five million bamboo straws daily. Each year, two billion bamboo straws are exported to more than 40 countries and regions, displacing approximately 6,000 tons of plastic and reducing carbon emissions by 36,000 tons.
“Bamboo straws do not soften in water or break easily, and they are fully renewable and biodegradable,” said Yin Mingliang, the company’s general manager. However, he noted that producing even a simple item like a straw posed significant technical challenges, including issues with mold resistance, heat tolerance, and high production costs.
Initial attempts to resolve these problems through partnerships with three PhD research teams were unsuccessful. A breakthrough came in 2017 when a fourth team, after three years of development, enhanced machinery efficiency to produce 2,000 straws per hour and reduced the unit cost to 0.04 yuan ($0.0056), roughly on par with plastic straws.
The company has also developed an integrated pyrolysis system that converts bamboo wastes into high-value products such as activated carbon and hard-carbon anode materials for sodium-ion batteries. The process captures and reuses steam, enhancing energy efficiency.
Chizhou, home to more than 600,000 mu (40,000 hectares) of bamboo forest, has historically underutilized this natural resource. Recently, the city launched a three-year action plan to promote bamboo as a plastic substitute, extend the industrial value chain, and raise incomes for local farmers.
“Who would have thought that bamboo, once overlooked, could now fetch a good price?” said Shu Rengui, a villager from Languan in Hengdu township of Shitai county, Chizhou, as he harvested bamboo in the morning mist. Shu supplies bamboo to a nearby processing facility and earns around 40,000 yuan annually from the business.
At a bamboo-processing base in Meijie township, Guichi district of Chizhou, two processing plants have been built, capable of handling 35,000 tons of bamboo annually. According to Zhang Yu, the site manager, more than 40 villagers are employed at the base, contributing to local income growth.
Chizhou has developed an integrated industry model linking leading enterprises, circular industrial parks, bamboo-splitting plants, and village cooperatives, establishing a full production chain that spans primary, advanced, and deep processing.
According to an official with the local forestry bureau, Chizhou now has 89 bamboo-processing enterprises with an annual capacity of 900,000 tons. In 2024, the city’s bamboo industry reached an output value of approximately 3 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 26 percent, and provided employment for nearly 40,000 rural households, boosting average household incomes by over 20,000 yuan.
The city is also expanding its global footprint. Through platforms such as the Canton Fair, or the China Import and Export Fair, bamboo products from Chizhou, including skewers, chopsticks, and straws, have entered markets in the EU, India, Japan, South Korea, and other countries and regions.
In December 2023, a Chizhou-based company was invited to speak at a side event organized by the International Bamboo and Rattan Organization during the 28th meeting of the Conference of the Parties (COP) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, or COP28, sharing China’s experience in plastics substitution.
Bamboo industry development in Chizhou is accelerating. At the first high-quality bamboo industry development conference for Anhui province in 2024, Chizhou High-Tech Industrial Development Zone signed a framework agreement with CRRC, China’s leading train maker, to establish a national bamboo circular-industry park headquarters in Chizhou. Plans are also underway to develop more than 50 such parks in bamboo-rich regions across the country.
Foreign
China set to advance intelligent, integrated, multi-dimensional transport network by 2030
By Han Xin, People’s Daily
China is accelerating the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into its transportation sector, aiming to establish an intelligent, integrated, and multi-dimensional national transport network by 2030. A recently issued government guideline outlines 16 targeted tasks across four strategic areas, including technological innovation and scenario-based application, in a bid to enhance mobility, improve safety, and reduce environmental impact.
The guideline emphasizes self-reliance in core technologies and sets out a roadmap to ensure China’s transport infrastructure ranks among the world’s most advanced by the end of the decade. The strategy centers on breakthroughs in applied AI technologies, innovation in intelligent transport products, and the development of large AI models tailored to comprehensive transport systems.
“Strengthening the supply of key technologies is essential to build a full innovation chain from research and development to practical application,” said Wang Yunpeng, an academician of the Chinese Academy of Engineering and president of Beihang University. Wang added that developing large-scale AI models would enable the creation of a “transport brain,” equipped with high-quality datasets, algorithm libraries, and digital toolchains to support intelligent transformation across the sector.
Progress in large transport models is already well underway. The Transport Foundation Model Innovation and Industrial Alliance — launched under the guidance of China’s Ministry of Transport — has brought together more than 50 leading enterprises, AI companies, and universities and research institutes, identifying 860 typical AI application scenarios.
At the enterprise level, China Logistics Group introduced a large model serving over 40 specific scenarios including multimodal transport and warehouse scheduling. A “smart hub” built upon a transport large model developed by Chinese tech firm Baidu has been deployed in over 10 cities, serving over 1 million vehicles equipped with L2 driver-assistance driving systems.
“Demonstration regions across the country are applying large-model-based solutions in areas such as road network monitoring and early warning, active management of high-traffic corridors, and integrated mobility services,” said an official from China’s Ministry of Transport. By enhancing capacity along major transport routes and implementing multi-tiered, refined traffic management models, these demonstration corridors have achieved approximately a 20 percent increase in traffic efficiency and a 30 percent improvement in emergency response efficiency during unforeseen events.
Enabled by big data analytics and high-precision modeling, AI is establishing a robust digital foundation for China’s transport infrastructure. Statistics show that the 20 designated demonstration regions for digital transformation of highway and waterway infrastructure now encompass more than 60,000 kilometers of upgraded corridors, comprising approximately 54,000 kilometers of highways and 7,500 kilometers of waterways. These improved sections form a critical backbone of the national integrated, multi-dimensional transport network.
Diverse application scenarios are essential for driving the deep integration of AI into the transportation sector. The newly issued guideline identifies intelligent application scenarios across seven major areas, including assisted driving, smart railways, and smart shipping, designed to accelerate innovation through real-world implementation. “These scenarios span almost all segments of the transport system, offering broader opportunities for testing and deploying new technologies and products,” Wang said.
On the waterways front, China now has 52 automated terminals. Domestically developed intelligent operating systems for fully automated container terminals have been implemented at more than a dozen terminals both domestically and internationally. Electronic navigation charts for waterways have been successfully deployed along the Yangtze River’s main and branch routes. The accelerated adoption of intelligent technologies across ports, waterways, and vessels is significantly enhancing the efficiency of waterborne transport.
Parallel advancements are also transforming China’s road networks. The Beijing-Xiong’an expressway, powered by Baidu AI Cloud, leverages the collaboration between vision and language-based large models to deliver second-level alerts for major traffic anomalies. Didi Autonomous Driving, in collaboration with Chinese automaker GAC Aion, has developed a new generation of factory-installed autonomous-driving vehicles. As autonomous driving converges with vehicle-road collaboration, a growing number of “smart vehicles” are taking to “smart roads,” accelerating the evolution of intelligent mobility.
Deep integration of AI and transportation also depends on next-generation infrastructure. The guideline outlines targeted measures in terms of computing power, data, and networks to strengthen the supply of essential elements.
For computing power, the guideline calls for better coordination of computing resources within the transport sector and strengthening computing capacity based on major transport infrastructure and local conditions.
In terms of data, China will accelerate the development of comprehensive transport big-data centers, promote data sharing, and build high-quality dataset construction to fully leverage data as a production factor.
In terms of network infrastructure, the guideline calls for the integrated application of multiple network technologies, the construction of intelligent sensing systems and the development of high-speed data transmission channels to enable low-latency, high-reliability, and wide-coverage connectivity for vehicle-road collaboration, remote operations, and real-time monitoring.
-
Uncategorized5 years agoFG, states urged to harness flooding for ranching, others with technology – Agbaje
-
Headlines10 years agoBreaking: EFCC seals Borno House of Assembly, as Hon members take to their heels
-
News11 years agoNigeria Security Operatives Stage Manhunt For Homosexual Perpetrator
-
News9 years agoHow 21-year-old Girl fled community over accusation of lesbianism
-
News10 years agoYobe Gov Moves Against Deputy
-
Opinion7 years ago7 signs she has friend zoned you
-
Technology4 years ago
Online job placement company headhunts women
-
Headlines10 years agoBorno Dep Gov Abducts Another Church Leader
