Foreign
International community should stay alert to Japan’s ‘deceptive diplomacy’
By Zhong Sheng, People’s Daily
At a time when Japan’s Takaichi administration has stirred up trouble over the Taiwan question and driven itself into a diplomatic cul-de-sac, Japanese Defense Minister Shinjiro Koizumi has been loudly hyping up the so-called “radar illumination” incident.
Koizumi first falsely claimed that Japan had received no notification from the Chinese side; after China released audio recordings of the relevant communication, he adjusted his stance, asserting that the information provided by China was “insufficient.”
Reports indicate that the Secretary General of Japan’s National Security Secretariat has also recently contacted officials from the UK, France, Germany, Canada and other countries, scrambling to justify and lobby for Takaichi’s remarks concerning Taiwan.
He claimed that Takaichi’s statements at the Diet meeting did not alter Japan’s long-standing position on Taiwan and that China’s criticism of Japan was “inconsistent with the facts.”
The series of maneuvers by Japanese politicians once again fully exposed their habitual dishonesty. They are adept at turning black into white, distorting the truth, and engaging in deceptive diplomacy, attempting to feign innocence and win sympathy on the international stage.
When a country consistently builds its policies on falsehoods, what does this mean for regional and global stability? History offers sobering insights.
“In all my fifty years of public service I have never seen a document that was more crowded with infamous falsehoods and distortions on a scale so huge that I never imagined until today that any government on this planet was capable of uttering them.” These words were spoken by former U.S. Secretary of State Cordell Hull.
After deciding to go to war against the United States in 1941, Japan secretly prepared for hostilities while continuing to dispatch so-called “peace envoys” to Washington, striking a pose of pursuing negotiations.
In the process, Japan deliberately sought to make greater use of Japanese Ambassador to the United States Kichisaburo Nomura, who had long been acquainted with then U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt.
After Japan’s surprise attack on Pearl Harbor, Hull received Japan’s note announcing the “termination of negotiations” and, in a state of profound indignation, uttered the words quoted above.
In his subsequent address to Congress requesting a declaration of war against Japan, Roosevelt also made a point of telling the American people that the United States had been at peace with Japan and, at Japan’s request, was still engaged in dialogue with the Japanese government in the hope of preserving peace in the Pacific.
“Our deceptive diplomacy is steadily heading toward success.” Postwar studies by Japanese scholars later revealed that Japan had smugly written such words in its war diaries.
Prior to the Pearl Harbor incident, Isoroku Yamamoto, one of the chief architects of the attack, clearly understood that only by successfully carrying out a deception could a surprise strike stand a chance. The utter unpreparedness of the United States was precisely the outcome Japan’s militarists sought through the painstaking fabrication of lies.
The despicable deception of Japanese militarism inflicted deep wounds on American society. After the war broke out, U.S. media uniformly used the word “betrayal” in headlines and editorials. The New York Times defined Japan’s attack on Pearl Harbor as a “treacherous betrayal,” while the Chicago Tribune ran an editorial saying that Japan’s treachery united the American people.
In his fireside chats, Roosevelt emphasized that not only must the stain of Japan’s treachery be wiped away, but the very roots of international aggression must be completely severed. Even after the war, Hull continued to express deep revulsion in his memoirs toward Japan’s “cunning and hypocrisy.”
Whenever Japan weaves lies, it does so with sinister intent. Today, Japan’s deceptive diplomacy is once again baring its fangs. On issues bearing on its own strategic direction, Japan repeatedly spreads falsehoods for the same reason — because it harbors ulterior motives.
Whether it is deliberately hyping the so-called “China threat” or using cooperation with U.S. forces as a pretext to lift the ban on collective self-defense, the real aim of Japan’s right wing is to break free from the constraints of the postwar international order and domestic law and to once again pursue military expansion.
Japan’s right wing is a habitual fabricator of “false narratives.” The international community must remain highly vigilant toward its strategic opportunism and adventurism. After all, Japan has never completed a proper reckoning with its war crimes of the past, and Japan’s right wing has never truly accepted its defeat 80 years ago.
Those with insight would do well to take a closer look at the words and deeds of Japanese right-wing politicians in recent years: claiming at Pearl Harbor commemorations that “both sides were perpetrators and victims”; asserting that the Pearl Harbor incident was a “deliberate framing” by the United States and that Japan’s actions were a “forced counterattack”; laying wreaths at monuments to Japanese war dead in Papua New Guinea.
The facts show that a Japan that refuses to accept its defeat is not only reversing course in its understanding of history, but is also repeatedly crossing red lines and provoking confrontation in reality.
The ebb and flow of the Pacific tides cannot wash away the monstrous crimes of Japanese militarism. Any appeasement or indulgence will only embolden historical revisionists.
The international community should draw lessons from history, see clearly Japan’s malicious strategic intentions, take a long-term view, and guard against the resurgence of Japanese militarism, lest it once again wreak subversive damage on the international order.
(Zhong Sheng is a pen name often used by People’s Daily to express its views on foreign policy and international affairs.)
Foreign
China’s Ninghai county produces 60 percent of world’s trekking poles
By Liu Junguo, People’s Daily
At a sports equipment store near the Milan-Cortina Winter Olympics venues, shelves are filled with all kinds of winter sports gear. Among the items, a pair of beginner ski poles prominently displays its origin: “Made in China.”
These poles hail from Ninghai county in Ningbo, east China’s Zhejiang province. This region, a powerhouse in outdoor equipment manufacturing, exports over 15 million ski and trekking poles annually to global markets.
Today, Ninghai commands nearly 60 percent of the global trekking pole market, with an annual output value approaching 1 billion yuan (about $145 million). Starting from scratch, the county has spent over two decades cultivating the industry and building technical expertise. It now boasts a complete of Ninghai Better Outdoor Products Co., Ltd. (Better), visitors are greeted by a diverse array of trekking poles. One standout item is a training pole designed for novice alpine skiers. Made from aviation-grade aluminum alloy, the ski pole weighs less than 200 grams, offering both lightness and strength. Its handle, crafted from specialized materials, features an ergonomic design for trekking pole supply chain and is home to numerous well-known manufacturers and exporters.
Stepping into a showroomadded comfort.
“Overseas orders for this specific product for the 2025-2026 snow season alone have exceeded 800,000 units, a 30 percent increase year-on-year,” said Zhu Xuefeng, general manager of the company.
Better exemplifies the success story of Ninghai, but its origins trace back 26 years.
In 2000, Hu Jinxue from Ninghai came across aluminum alloy trekking poles from Germany at an overseas trade fair. He quickly recognized the potential of the outdoor equipment industry.
“At the time, Ninghai had a solid base in aluminum alloy forging, but its products carried low added value. Local enterprises were eager to upgrade, yet lacked a clear direction,” Hu recalled.
After returning to China, he founded his company Xingda, introduced advanced technologies, and began producing trekking poles.
Leveraging strong expertise in metal processing and sustained technological upgrades, Xingda has grown into a leading industry player over the past two decades.
Even in its early stages, Ninghai adopted a forward-looking approach by identifying trekking poles as one of its key industries. A series of targeted measures has since helped turn it into a sector with an annual output approaching 1 billion yuan.
Inside Xingda’s smart factory, robotic arms move with precision, nano-level ironing activates fiber properties, and intelligent winding systems from dense, layered structures. Remarkably, within just 15 seconds, a roll of carbon fiber fabric is transformed into the high-strength shaft of a premium ski pole
As a key raw material for outdoor equipment such as ski poles, carbon shafts have long been expensive and subject to lengthy procurement cycles. Five years ago, Xingda still relied heavily on imports.
At that time, China depended on foreign suppliers for more than 90 percent of its high-end carbon fiber products, leaving independent innovation as the only sustainable path forward. Xingda responded by investing 70 percent of its annual profits into building a carbon shaft production facility and assembling a research team led by PhDs in materials science. After three years of intensive research, the company overcame key technical bottlenecks and achieved self-sufficiency in this critical material.
This breakthrough not only ensured stable supply and reduced costs but also led to a substantial leap in quality: Xingda’s carbon shafts are now 20 percent stronger than those produced by leading international brands..
Innovation is gaining momentum across Ninghai. Local manufacturers have filed more than 90 domestic patents, including utility models and industrial designs.
“This is one of our newly developed ski poles, designed to deliver high performance with environmental sustainability,” said Zhu Zhenkun, general manager of Ningbo Eastdragon Hardware Co., Ltd. (Eastdragon), displaying a sample. The eco-conscious design has proven highly popular in overseas markets.
In recent years, Zhu and his team have expanded internationally, where increasingly stringent carbon certification standards in Europe and the United States pose new challenges. In response, Eastdragon has not only improved product quality but also embedded green principles throughout its manufacturing process.
During production, leftover aluminum is recycled and reused, while new materials and processes are continuously explored. “After extensive testing of different handle materials, our research and development (R&D) team selected a biodegradable seaweed-based material,” Zhu said. “Handles made from this material offer a more comfortable grip and help reduce water use and carbon emissions.”
From a single product to a thriving industry, trekking poles have become a driver of local growth. Today, Ninghai has developed a complete industrial chain covering R&D and design, materials processing, component manufacturing, final assembly, and brand operations. Today, the county hosts 34 leading enterprises and innovative small and medium-sized businesses within this specialized sector, solidifying its position as the world’s foremost center for trekking pole production.
Foreign
China implements measures to counter Japan’s accelerating remilitarization
By Zhong Sheng, People’s Daily
China’s Ministry of Commerce has announced the placement of 20 Japanese entities involved in enhancing military capabilities on its export control list. A further 20 Japanese entities, where the end-users and end-uses of dual-use items cannot be verified, have been added to a watch list.
These actions are taken to safeguard China’s national security and interests, fulfilling international non-proliferation obligations, and prevent Japan’s pursuit of remilitarization and nuclear armament.
The measures are fully justified, reasonable, and lawful, demonstrating China’s commitment to the rule of law and its responsibilities as a major country.
This follows China’s January 6th announcement of strengthened export controls on dual-use items to Japan. The latest move explicitly names specific companies, translates earlier restrictions into targeted, enforceable, entity-based controls designed to effectively safeguard national security and regional peace and stability.
According to international legal instruments such as the Cairo Declaration, the Potsdam Proclamation, and the Japanese Instrument of Surrender, Japan is required to be fully disarmed and must not maintain industries that would enable its rearmament.
However, a number of Japanese companies, including Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, IHI Corporation, and Kawasaki Heavy Industries, have long been active in the defense sector, producing equipment such as naval vessels, fighter aircraft, and missiles.
For instance, multiple subsidiaries of Mitsubishi Heavy Industries have participated in the development of Japan’s hypersonic weapon system, the Hyper-Velocity Gliding Projectile for remote island defense. Vessels built by Mitsubishi Shipbuilding have not only supported Japan’s maritime activities related to the Diaoyu Islands, but have also been supplied to the Philippine Coast Guard for use in the South China Sea, posing risks to regional peace and stability.
China’s measures represent a targeted response to curb Japan’s development of offensive military capabilities and to uphold international law and the post-war international order.
Japan’s push toward remilitarization is following a clear trajectory, with a new military-industrial complex rapidly taking shape.
In recent years, Japan has accelerated its military buildup, with defense spending rising for 14 consecutive years from fiscal 2012 through fiscal 2026, and effectively doubling within three years since 2022.
State-driven support has enabled Japanese defense contractors to reap substantial profits, even fueling what some describe as a “defense bubble” in capital markets. Data show that since November 2022, the stock price of Mitsubishi Heavy Industries has surged by more than 650 percent, IHI Corporation by over 480 percent, and Kawasaki Heavy Industries by more than 280 percent. In stark contrast, Japan’s manufacturing sector has recorded an average annual growth rate of less than 1 percent over the same period.
Since Sanae Takaichi assumed power, Japan’s remilitarization process has noticeably accelerated. War preparedness has been elevated to an overriding national priority, with further support extended to defense-related interest groups.
Reports indicate that the Japanese government plans to address defense funding gaps through large-scale bond issuance and a special income tax, while also preparing to establish a “national intelligence agency” this year.
In a recent policy speech in the House of Representatives, Takaichi asserted that Japan must fundamentally strengthen its defense capabilities and pledged to clearly communicate defense procurement needs to industry. These steps are likely to further bind Japan’s defense spending to specific industrial and corporate interests, creating a self-reinforcing cycle.
At the same time, right-wing forces in Japan have shown a growing ambition to pursue nuclear capabilities. In recent months, some Japanese politicians have openly advocated for nuclear armament and sought to revise the long-standing “Three Non-Nuclear Principles.”
It is widely recognized as a “nuclear-threshold state,” having long produced and stockpiled plutonium far exceeding civilian needs. By the end of 2024, Japan possessed as much as 44.4 tons of separated plutonium.
With a complete nuclear fuel cycle and advanced nuclear industry capabilities, Japan is technically capable of producing weapons-grade plutonium. Should right-wing political forces push Japan across the nuclear threshold, it would represent a severel breach of the global nuclear non-proliferation regime.
A recent commentary by Singapore’s Lianhe Zaobao noted that nuclear non-proliferation remains central to international politics, and that Japan’s pursuit of nuclear weapons runs counter to the interests of Southeast Asia, where reducing arms races and minimizing the risk of conflict are essential to regional stability.
Japan’s remilitarization and nuclear ambitions pose a serious threat to regional peace and stability. The lessons of history make clear that appeasement of militarism amounts to a betrayal of peace. Countering the rise of right-wing forces in Japan requires concrete actions.
China’s law-based control measures aimed to prevent dual-use items from feeding into Japan’s military expansion and firmly curb any resurgence of militarism. China will work together with all peace-loving countries to uphold the post-war international order and jointly maintain regional security and stability.
Japan’s right-wing forces should recognize that a return to militarism leads only to self-destruction. Any reckless attempt to challenge international justice and the global order is bound to meet firm resistance from the forces of justice around the world.
(Zhong Sheng is a pen name often used by People’s Daily to express its views on foreign policy and international affairs.)
Foreign
Integrating grassroots Perspectives into China’s legislative process
By Zhang Tianpei, People’s Daily
Shanghai recently hosted a legislative consultation meeting on the draft law on promoting ethnic unity and progress at the Gubei civic center in Changning district’s Hongqiao subdistrict.
The meeting fostered an engaged discussion, with attendees — including deputies to the National People’s Congress (NPC), academics, legal professionals, and members of non- Communist Party of China political parties — offering a wealth of valuable insights.
For Sheng Hong, an NPC deputy and Party branch secretary in the local Ronghua No. 4 Residents’ Community, this marked her 11th such consultation meeting within a year.
“Over the past year,” Sheng noted, “the scope of these legislative consultations have covered critical areas like ecological and environmental protection, urban governance, and public well-being. Participants contribute diverse perspectives and specific revision suggestions based on their professional expertise. This process effectively integrates grassroots voices and professional insights, ensuring draft laws are more grounded in reality.”
Sheng reflected on the evolution of public participation. Initially, residents visited grassroots legislative outreach offices primarily to understand how laws are made. Gradually, she observed, they evolved from passive recipients of legislative information into active advocates for legal awareness. Today, a robust network for gathering public opinion has taken shape, with participation expanding significantly.
A notable moment came in July 2025, Sheng recalled, when the State Council issued guidelines on gradually implementing free preschool education. Residents who had previously contributed to consultations on the draft preschool education law felt a profound sense of accomplishment. “They recognized that ideas debated at our grassroots offices were being reflected in national policy,” Sheng explained.
She emphasized the shifting public expectations: “The focus is no longer just on whether laws exist, but on their effectiveness, practicality, and ability to solve real-world problems.” During the legislative process of the preschool education law, factors such as demographic changes in school-age populations and household financial capacity were fully considered.
The resulting legislation aims to encourage increased government investment to reduce family burdens while simultaneously strengthening kindergarten teaching staff and improving facilities. “Beyond ensuring access,” Sheng stated, “the law actively addresses the public’s demand for high-quality early education, enhancing its relevance and timeliness.”
Promoting “public well-being” with “public voices,” a steady stream of practical, experience-based legislative suggestions is being conveyed from grassroots legislative outreach offices to the Great Hall of the People for legal adoption.
To date, the Legislative Affairs Commission of the NPC Standing Committee has set up 60 local legislative outreach offices nationwide. Additionally, provincial and city-level legislatures operate a network of over 7,800 such offices. In 2025 alone, opinions and suggestions were solicited from these offices on 26 draft laws, yielding more than 34,000 submissions, many of which have been adopted in legislation.
“Matters of the people should be discussed by the people themselves,” Sheng said. “As an NPC deputy from the primary level, I will continue to stay close to the people, listen to their voices, pool their wisdom, and bring more of their views to the Great Hall of the People, contributing to the practice of whole-process people’s democracy at the grassroots level and to improving the quality of legislation.”
-
Uncategorized5 years agoFG, states urged to harness flooding for ranching, others with technology – Agbaje
-
Headlines10 years agoBreaking: EFCC seals Borno House of Assembly, as Hon members take to their heels
-
News12 years agoNigeria Security Operatives Stage Manhunt For Homosexual Perpetrator
-
News9 years agoHow 21-year-old Girl fled community over accusation of lesbianism
-
News10 years agoYobe Gov Moves Against Deputy
-
Opinion7 years ago7 signs she has friend zoned you
-
Technology4 years ago
Online job placement company headhunts women
-
Headlines10 years agoBorno Dep Gov Abducts Another Church Leader
