Connect with us

Foreign

Japan shows no conscience as regards decision to dump nuclear wastewater into sea

Published

on

Thsee Japanese government has abandoned the basic principles of international morality and justice with its extremely irresponsible decision to dump nuclear wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima nuclear plant into the Pacific Ocean.

The unilateral decision of Japan, which was not made out of absolute necessity, has aroused strong denunciation from the international community.

It is well known that the Japanese government did not exhaust all the means of safe disposal, yet it decided to risk global public health and safety and the vital interests of the people of Japan’s neighbors in total disregard of widespread doubts and opposition from the international community.

So far, there is no precedent in the world for discharging water contaminated in nuclear accident into the sea. The wastewater from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant after the highest-level nuclear accident is entirely different from the wastewater produced from the normal operation of nuclear power plants.

The claim of the Japanese side that the nuclear wastewater is safe was solely based on data unilaterally released by the country. However, such data is less than convincing, considering that Japan’s nuclear power industry has been faced with unceasing problems during the past decades, and Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. (TEPCO), the owner and operator of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant, has frequently appeared in scandals and long been covering up safety loopholes through means including tampering with data, along with its frequent accidents.

An earlier review report by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) expert team pointed out that if the wastewater containing tritium from the Fukushima nuclear plant is discharged into the sea, it will affect the marine environment and the health of people in neighboring countries and that the treated wastewater needs to be further purified to remove other radionuclides.

With the world’s strongest currents along the coast of Fukushima, radioactive materials could spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within 57 days from the date of discharge, and reach all oceans of the globe in a decade, according to a German marine scientific research institute.

Greenpeace nuclear experts said that the level of the radioactive isotope carbon-14 in the wastewater will remain hazardous for thousands of years and have the potential to cause genetic damage.

It’s astonishing that the Japanese side just turned a deaf ear to views from these authoritative institutions.

The Japanese side’s daydream of simply dumping the contaminated water from the Fukushima nuclear plant into the sea and getting done with it is actually self-deceiving. Even if Japan can get rid of the burden of cleaning up after a nuclear accident, it will never end the vicious circle of ecological problems after the ecological environment is ruined.

Five proposals were put forward during discussions on the disposal of the contaminated water from the Fukushima nuclear plant held by Japan’s Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, including releasing the radioactive water into the atmosphere through evaporation, disposing of the wastewater via electrolysis, diluting the wastewater and discharging it into the sea, injecting the contaminated water deep underground, and burying it underground.

The Japanese side claimed that discharging the nuclear wastewater into the sea is the least costly and easiest option. Obviously, in order to shift the burden and risks onto others, the Japanese government has chosen to be selfish and heartless.

As sharply pointed out by people in Japan who oppose the decision, the Japanese government and TEPCO are not unable to, but do not want to, adopt other proposals.

Japan’s decision to dump the nuclear wastewater into the sea is “particularly disappointing as experts believe alternative solutions to the problem are available,” says a joint statement by the United Nations (UN) human rights experts.

“We remind Japan of its international obligations to prevent exposure to hazardous substances, to conduct environmental impact assessments of the risks that the discharge of water may have, to prevent transboundary environmental harms, and to protect the marine environment,” experts said in the joint statement published on April 15.

The ocean is mankind’s shared property. The disposal of the wastewater from the Fukushima nuclear power plant is absolutely not a domestic issue for Japan and the country shall by no means be allowed to continue persisting in the irresponsible decision.

According to relevant international conventions such as the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, the Convention on Early Notification of a Nuclear Accident, and the Convention on Nuclear Safety, the Japanese side should take on international obligations including notification and full consultation, environmental assessment and monitoring, preventive measures to minimize risks, and information transparency.

China summoned the Japanese ambassador to China and lodged solemn representations against the Japanese government’s decision to dump the nuclear wastewater from the Fukushima nuclear power plant into the sea. The South Korean foreign ministry summoned Japanese ambassador to Seoul to protest against the decision of the Japanese government. Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson made a statement to criticize Japan for the decision. The Pacific Islands Forum (PIF) demanded that an independent expert review regarding the decision be undertaken to the satisfaction of all PIF members. Philippine presidential spokesperson said that nations behind environmental pollution should pay for the damage.

The Japanese side must understand that justice will not be absent from safeguarding people’s rights to life and health.

It seems that the Japanese government shows no conscience by inflicting such a thoughtless decision on mankind.

The Japanese side had better face up to its responsibility, adopt a scientific attitude, fulfill its international obligations, withdraw its erroneous decision, and conduct in-depth assessment of the possible impacts of its disposal of the nuclear wastewater from the Fukushima nuclear power plant.

The Japanese government should actively and timely release relevant information in a stringent, accurate, open, and transparent manner, strictly accept international assessment, verification and supervision with substantial participation of all stakeholders including China and other neighboring countries as well as relevant international organizations, prudently make a decision on the issue according to the consensus reached among all parties, and refrain from discharging its radioactive water before the decision is made.

People’s Daily

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Foreign

China’s Ninghai county produces 60 percent of world’s trekking poles

Published

on

By Liu Junguo, People’s Daily

At a sports equipment store near the Milan-Cortina Winter Olympics venues, shelves are filled with all kinds of winter sports gear. Among the items, a pair of beginner ski poles prominently displays its origin: “Made in China.” 

These poles hail from Ninghai county in Ningbo, east China’s Zhejiang province. This region, a powerhouse in outdoor equipment manufacturing, exports over 15 million ski and trekking poles annually to global markets.

Today, Ninghai commands nearly 60 percent of the global trekking pole market, with an annual output value approaching 1 billion yuan (about $145 million). Starting from scratch, the county has spent over two decades cultivating the industry and building technical expertise. It now boasts a complete  of Ninghai Better Outdoor Products Co., Ltd. (Better), visitors are greeted by a diverse array of trekking poles. One standout item is a training pole designed for novice alpine skiers. Made from aviation-grade aluminum alloy, the ski pole weighs less than 200 grams, offering both lightness and strength. Its handle, crafted from specialized materials, features an ergonomic design for trekking pole supply chain and is home to numerous well-known manufacturers and exporters.

Stepping into a showroomadded comfort.

“Overseas orders for this specific product for the 2025-2026 snow season alone have exceeded 800,000 units, a 30 percent increase year-on-year,” said Zhu Xuefeng, general manager of the company.

Better exemplifies the success story of Ninghai, but its origins trace back 26 years.

In 2000, Hu Jinxue from Ninghai came across aluminum alloy trekking poles from Germany at an overseas trade fair. He quickly recognized the potential of the outdoor equipment industry.

“At the time, Ninghai had a solid base in aluminum alloy forging, but its products carried low added value. Local enterprises were eager to upgrade, yet lacked a clear direction,” Hu recalled. 

After returning to China, he founded his company Xingda, introduced advanced technologies, and began producing trekking poles.

Leveraging strong expertise in metal processing and sustained technological upgrades, Xingda has grown into a leading industry player over the past two decades.

Even in its early stages, Ninghai adopted a forward-looking approach by identifying trekking poles as one of its key industries. A series of targeted measures has since helped turn it into a sector with an annual output approaching 1 billion yuan.

Inside Xingda’s smart factory, robotic arms move with precision, nano-level ironing activates fiber properties, and intelligent winding systems from dense, layered structures. Remarkably, within just 15 seconds, a roll of carbon fiber fabric is transformed into the high-strength shaft of a premium ski pole

As a key raw material for outdoor equipment such as ski poles, carbon shafts have long been expensive and subject to lengthy procurement cycles. Five years ago, Xingda still relied heavily on imports.

At that time, China depended on foreign suppliers for more than 90 percent of its high-end carbon fiber products, leaving independent innovation as the only sustainable path forward. Xingda responded by investing 70 percent of its annual profits into building a carbon shaft production facility and assembling a research team led by PhDs in materials science. After three years of intensive research, the company overcame key technical bottlenecks and achieved self-sufficiency in this critical material.

This breakthrough not only ensured stable supply and reduced costs but also led to a substantial leap in quality: Xingda’s carbon shafts are now 20 percent stronger than those produced by leading international brands..

Innovation is gaining momentum across Ninghai. Local manufacturers have filed more than 90 domestic patents, including utility models and industrial designs.

“This is one of our newly developed ski poles, designed to deliver high performance with environmental sustainability,” said Zhu Zhenkun, general manager of Ningbo Eastdragon Hardware Co., Ltd. (Eastdragon), displaying a sample. The eco-conscious design has proven highly popular in overseas markets.

In recent years, Zhu and his team have expanded internationally, where increasingly stringent carbon certification standards in Europe and the United States pose new challenges. In response, Eastdragon has not only improved product quality but also embedded green principles throughout its manufacturing process.

During production, leftover aluminum is recycled and reused, while new materials and processes are continuously explored. “After extensive testing of different handle materials, our research and development (R&D) team selected a biodegradable seaweed-based material,” Zhu said. “Handles made from this material offer a more comfortable grip and help reduce water use and carbon emissions.”

From a single product to a thriving industry, trekking poles have become a driver of local growth. Today, Ninghai has developed a complete industrial chain covering R&D and design, materials processing, component manufacturing, final assembly, and brand operations.  Today, the county hosts 34 leading enterprises and innovative small and medium-sized businesses within this specialized sector, solidifying its position as the world’s foremost center for trekking pole production.

Continue Reading

Foreign

China implements measures to counter Japan’s accelerating remilitarization

Published

on

By Zhong Sheng, People’s Daily

China’s Ministry of Commerce has announced the placement of 20 Japanese entities involved in enhancing military capabilities on its export control list. A further 20 Japanese entities, where the end-users and end-uses of dual-use items cannot be verified, have been added to a watch list.

These actions are taken to safeguard China’s national security and interests, fulfilling international non-proliferation obligations, and prevent Japan’s pursuit of remilitarization and nuclear armament. 

The measures are fully justified, reasonable, and lawful, demonstrating China’s commitment to the rule of law and its responsibilities as a major country.

This follows China’s January 6th announcement of strengthened export controls on dual-use items to Japan. The latest move explicitly names specific companies, translates earlier restrictions into targeted, enforceable, entity-based controls designed to effectively safeguard national security and regional peace and stability. 

According to international legal instruments such as the Cairo Declaration, the Potsdam Proclamation, and the Japanese Instrument of Surrender, Japan is required to be fully disarmed and must not maintain industries that would enable its rearmament. 

However, a number of Japanese companies, including Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, IHI Corporation, and Kawasaki Heavy Industries, have long been active in the defense sector, producing equipment such as naval vessels, fighter aircraft, and missiles. 

For instance, multiple subsidiaries of Mitsubishi Heavy Industries have participated in the development of Japan’s hypersonic weapon system, the Hyper-Velocity Gliding Projectile for remote island defense. Vessels built by Mitsubishi Shipbuilding have not only supported Japan’s maritime activities related to the Diaoyu Islands, but have also been supplied to the Philippine Coast Guard for use in the South China Sea, posing risks to regional peace and stability. 

China’s measures represent a targeted response to curb Japan’s development of offensive military capabilities and to uphold international law and the post-war international order.

Japan’s push toward remilitarization is following a clear trajectory, with a new military-industrial complex rapidly taking shape. 

In recent years, Japan has accelerated its military buildup, with defense spending rising for 14 consecutive years from fiscal 2012 through fiscal 2026, and effectively doubling within three years since 2022.

State-driven support has enabled Japanese defense contractors to reap substantial profits, even fueling what some describe as a “defense bubble” in capital markets. Data show that since November 2022, the stock price of Mitsubishi Heavy Industries has surged by more than 650 percent, IHI Corporation by over 480 percent, and Kawasaki Heavy Industries by more than 280 percent. In stark contrast, Japan’s manufacturing sector has recorded an average annual growth rate of less than 1 percent over the same period.

Since Sanae Takaichi assumed power, Japan’s remilitarization process has noticeably accelerated. War preparedness has been elevated to an overriding national priority, with further support extended to defense-related interest groups. 

Reports indicate that the Japanese government plans to address defense funding gaps through large-scale bond issuance and a special income tax, while also preparing to establish a “national intelligence agency” this year. 

In a recent policy speech in the House of Representatives, Takaichi asserted that Japan must fundamentally strengthen its defense capabilities and pledged to clearly communicate defense procurement needs to industry. These steps are likely to further bind Japan’s defense spending to specific industrial and corporate interests, creating a self-reinforcing cycle.

At the same time, right-wing forces in Japan have shown a growing ambition to pursue nuclear capabilities. In recent months, some Japanese politicians have openly advocated for nuclear armament and sought to revise the long-standing “Three Non-Nuclear Principles.” 

It is widely recognized as a “nuclear-threshold state,” having long produced and stockpiled plutonium far exceeding civilian needs. By the end of 2024, Japan possessed as much as 44.4 tons of separated plutonium. 

With a complete nuclear fuel cycle and advanced nuclear industry capabilities, Japan is technically capable of producing weapons-grade plutonium. Should right-wing political forces push Japan across the nuclear threshold, it would represent a severel breach of the global nuclear non-proliferation regime. 

A recent commentary by Singapore’s Lianhe Zaobao noted that nuclear non-proliferation remains central to international politics, and that Japan’s pursuit of nuclear weapons runs counter to the interests of Southeast Asia, where reducing arms races and minimizing the risk of conflict are essential to regional stability.

Japan’s remilitarization and nuclear ambitions pose a serious threat to regional peace and stability. The lessons of history make clear that appeasement of militarism amounts to a betrayal of peace. Countering the rise of right-wing forces in Japan requires concrete actions.

China’s law-based control measures aimed to prevent dual-use items from feeding into Japan’s military expansion and firmly curb any resurgence of militarism. China will work together with all peace-loving countries to uphold the post-war international order and jointly maintain regional security and stability.

Japan’s right-wing forces should recognize that a return to militarism leads only to self-destruction.  Any reckless attempt to challenge international justice and the global order is bound to meet firm resistance from the forces of justice around the world.

(Zhong Sheng is a pen name often used by People’s Daily to express its views on foreign policy and international affairs.)

Continue Reading

Foreign

Integrating grassroots Perspectives into China’s legislative process

Published

on

By Zhang Tianpei, People’s Daily

Shanghai recently hosted a legislative consultation meeting on the draft law on promoting ethnic unity and progress at the Gubei civic center in Changning district’s Hongqiao subdistrict. 

The meeting fostered an engaged discussion, with attendees — including deputies to the National People’s Congress (NPC), academics, legal professionals, and members of non- Communist Party of China political parties — offering a wealth of valuable insights.

For Sheng Hong, an NPC deputy and Party branch secretary in the local Ronghua No. 4 Residents’ Community, this marked her 11th such consultation meeting within a year.

“Over the past year,” Sheng noted, “the scope of these legislative consultations have covered critical areas like ecological and environmental protection, urban governance, and public well-being. Participants contribute diverse perspectives and specific revision suggestions based on their professional expertise. This process effectively integrates grassroots voices and professional insights, ensuring draft laws are more grounded in reality.”

Sheng reflected on the evolution of public participation. Initially, residents visited grassroots legislative outreach offices primarily to understand how laws are made. Gradually, she observed, they evolved from passive recipients of legislative information into active advocates for legal awareness. Today, a robust network for gathering public opinion has taken shape, with participation expanding significantly.

A notable moment came in July 2025, Sheng recalled, when the State Council issued guidelines on gradually implementing free preschool education. Residents who had previously contributed to consultations on the draft preschool education law felt a profound sense of accomplishment.  “They recognized that ideas debated at our grassroots offices were being reflected in national policy,” Sheng explained.

She emphasized the shifting public expectations: “The focus is no longer just on whether laws exist, but on their effectiveness, practicality, and ability to solve real-world problems.” During the legislative process of the preschool education law, factors such as demographic changes in school-age populations and household financial capacity were fully considered. 

The resulting legislation aims to encourage increased government investment to reduce family burdens while simultaneously strengthening kindergarten teaching staff and improving facilities. “Beyond ensuring access,” Sheng stated, “the law actively addresses the public’s demand for high-quality early education, enhancing its relevance and timeliness.”

Promoting “public well-being” with “public voices,” a steady stream of practical, experience-based legislative suggestions is being conveyed from grassroots legislative outreach offices to the Great Hall of the People for legal adoption.

To date, the Legislative Affairs Commission of the NPC Standing Committee has set up 60 local legislative outreach offices nationwide. Additionally, provincial and city-level legislatures operate a network of over 7,800 such offices. In 2025 alone, opinions and suggestions were solicited from these offices on 26 draft laws, yielding more than 34,000 submissions, many of which have been adopted in legislation.

“Matters of the people should be discussed by the people themselves,” Sheng said. “As an NPC deputy from the primary level, I will continue to stay close to the people, listen to their voices, pool their wisdom, and bring more of their views to the Great Hall of the People, contributing to the practice of whole-process people’s democracy at the grassroots level and to improving the quality of legislation.”

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2017 Zox News Theme. Theme by MVP Themes, powered by WordPress.