Connect with us

News

Kano Emirate: The intrigues and controversies of deposition

Published

on

Since the formation of Kano Emirate in 1805, attempts were made twice to split the emirate. The two administrations hinged their reasons on the need to boost development in the state.

Late Abubakar Rimi, who was governor from 1979 to 1983 created five emirates out of Kano Emirate.

However, his successor, Alhaji Sabo Bakin-Zuwo reversed the creation.

Many Nigerians saw it coming, when incumbent governor, Alhaji Abdullahi Ganduje, on May 8, 2019, assented to the bill passed by the Kano State House of Assembly, seeking the decentralisation of the Kano Emirate.

ALSO READ:EKEDC commiserates with victims of Abule Ado gas explosion

Ganduje justified the creation, as he claimed that it was the wish of Kano people.

“With the creation of more emirates, all sectors of the society would improve. It will also lead to more concentration on our health, education and other equally important sectors of the society.

“That is the popular wish of our people, the people of Kano State. This will also go a long way in hastening growth and development of the state.

“The efforts didn’t get through many years ago, but now we are happy to see that the idea would come into fruition.’’

He further explains that the development will allow the state to re-examine history, insisting that the emirates were created to reduce the burden on the Kano Emirate.

“The creation of the additional emirates will allow us to re-examine history, this is not something new in Kano, it has happened before.

“We created emirates based on the aspirations and yearnings of our people. I am sure this development will lead to rapid development in the affected areas.’’

The new law authorised the creation of four emirates with first class emirs.

The emirates are: Rano, Karaye, Bichi and Gaya.

Irrespective of Ganduje’s claim, analysts say it was targeted at the deposed Emir of Kano, Alhaji Muhammadu Sanusi II, who is believed to have a frosty political relationship with Ganduje.

Although efforts were made to stop the process of creating new emirates, all the efforts failed.

Concerned citizens of the state had earlier expressed concern about the speed in which the governor assented to the bill seeking the creation of more emirates.

Some of them weave up sentiments, recalling that in 1963, the Premier of Northern Region, Sir Ahmadu Bello, dethroned Muhammadu Sanusi I, the grandfather of Muhammadu Sanusi II.

Similarly, they recalled that former Gov. Abubakar Rimi in 1981, restricted traditional homage paid by village heads to Ado Bayero and excised some domains from his emirate.

In 1982, Rimi returned the dethroned Sanusi I to Wudil, near Kano and created four new emirates, a development critics said was designed to spite the emir.

Political analysts believe that Ganduje and the deposed emir have endured a frosty relationship for quite some time because of the deposed emir’s political views and criticisms of some of the governor’s policies and actions.

The deposed emir was accused of partisanship during the March 9, 2019 Governorship and State House of Assembly Elections in which Ganduje of the All Progressives Congress (APC) won.

Outright winner did not emerge at first ballot; Ganduje polled 953,522 votes, while Alhaji Abba Kabir-Yusuf of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) polled 1,014,353 votes

The deposed emir was then accused of supporting Kabir-Yusuf, the preferred candidate of Kwankwaso, a development many analysts believe to be the cause of the emir’s challenge.

Creating more emirates, was therefore, perceived as an attempt to reduce the powers of the emir.

The initial refusal of the deposed emir to appear before a panel that was investigating allegations of corruption against him did not go down well with the government.

Apart from this, the dethroned emir was accused of not attending state functions and official meetings, which the government said amounted to “total insubordination’’.

He was also accused of selling government property and mismanaging funds, but he secured a court order stopping the probe by the Kano Public Complaints and Anti-Corruption Commission.

In spite of the court order, the Kano State House of Assembly began a fresh probe of the deposed emir, and announced that the assembly received two petitions against the deposed emir.

He was accused of unethical conduct that contradicted the culture and tradition of Kano people.

The Kano Public Complaints and Anti-Corruption Commission had earlier submitted a report to Kano State Government recommending the suspension of the emir.

It further explained that the fresh investigation had nothing to do with alleged mismanagement of N3.4billion by the Emirate Council.

But on March 9, a letter signed by Alhaji Usman Alhaji, Secretary to Kano State Government, was addressed to Sanusi, informing him that he had been deposed from the throne of Emir of Kano by the Kano State Government.

The letter stated that the Kano State Executive Council during its meeting on March 9, approved of the action and directed the immediate removal and dethronement of Sanusi as the Emir of Kano.

The letter further stated that the decision to depose the emir was taken due to Sanusi’s alleged general “disrespect’’ to lawful instructions from the authorities.

Also, the letter stated that the decision was to safeguard the sanctity, culture, tradition and prestige of the Kano Emirate.

Sanusi accepted his removal in good faith.

He said: “I have been on this throne for almost six years and (in charge of) our heritage. Today, the almighty Allah, who gave me the leadership, has destined to take it back.

“As I always say, leadership has predetermined tenure; the days Allah destined are numbered. When the days come to an end, one must leave; we have accepted whatever Allah decides.

“We have agreed. We appreciate (God). We are happy and we know it is what is best for us.

“We enjoin everyone to remain peaceful. We have directed our family, our children and those that support us that whoever gets it and is endorsed by the people they should pay allegiance to him.

“They should follow him (the new emir). They should guard his honour and dignity because that is also the honour and dignity of this palace.

“It is a thing of pride that made us to rule and end in the same fashion as Halifa.”

Sanusi was `banished’ to Nasarawa State, but later got his freedom via a court order, to live in a place of his choice, except Kano. He decided for Lagos.

Only time will tell, whether or not there will be another Bakin-Zuwo, to revert the action.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Dogara Celebrates Baba Jang at 82, Hails Him as a Visionary Statesman

Published

on

By

Former Speaker of the House of Representatives and Chairman, Board of Trustees of the National Credit Guarantee Company Limited (NCGC), Rt. Hon. Yakubu Dogara, has joined Nigerians in celebrating Former Governor Jonah Jang, fondly called Baba Jang, as he clocks 82 years.

In a glowing tribute, Dogara described Baba Jang as a visionary leader whose life and service remain a beacon of hope for generations. He noted that Jang’s tenure as Governor of Plateau State was marked by courage, foresight, and an unwavering commitment to peace, unity, and development.

“Baba Jang’s life is a testimony of service and sacrifice. He invested in infrastructure, strengthened institutions, and worked tirelessly to foster unity in Plateau State. His leadership was never about personal gain but about building lasting foundations for progress,” Dogara said.

He further emphasized that Jang’s integrity, resilience, and mentorship have shaped leaders across Nigeria, adding that his legacy continues to inspire beyond the boundaries of Plateau State.

“As he celebrates 82 years, we honor him not just for the offices he has held, but for the enduring impact he has made on countless lives. Baba Jang remains a statesman, a father figure, and a model of quality leadership,” Dogara added.

The tribute underscores Baba Jang’s enduring influence in Nigerian politics and governance, highlighting his role as a leader whose footprints on the sands of time cannot be erased.

Continue Reading

News

Civil Society Coalition Raises Alarm Over Nigeria’s Maritime Boundaries, Oil Wells Allocation

Published

on

A coalition of Civil Society Organizations (CSOs), maritime experts and policy advocates has raised serious concerns over Nigeria’s maritime boundary management and the allocation of offshore oil wells, calling for urgent intervention by the Federal Government.

The concerns were presented on Thursday in Abuja during a civil society roundtable where the coalition leader, Dr. Gabriel Nwambu, addressed stakeholders and unveiled the communiqué issued after a recent verification mission to Nigeria’s offshore maritime corridor bordering Cameroon and Equatorial Guinea.

The communiqué followed a technical fact-finding and verification exercise conducted at sea on February 28, 2026, focusing on Nigeria’s offshore hydrocarbon blocks OML 114, OML 115 and OML 123 as well as the maritime boundary areas involving Nigeria, Cameroon and Equatorial Guinea.

Dr. Nwambu explained that the mission involved maritime governance stakeholders, mapping professionals and public policy experts who undertook physical observation of the maritime corridor, technical mapping verification and consultations with relevant authorities.

According to the coalition, the mission sought to independently verify the status of Nigeria’s maritime boundaries, offshore hydrocarbon entitlements and the implications of administrative and regulatory decisions affecting the Cross River maritime corridor.

ICJ Judgment Clarified
Presenting the findings, the coalition noted that the 2002 judgment of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) between Nigeria and Cameroon ceded only specific settlements in the southern Bakassi Peninsula — Atabong, Akwabana and Archibong Town — to Cameroon.

The coalition stressed that several areas often assumed to have been ceded were not included in the ruling.

“The Cross River Estuary and the western Bakassi peninsular islands of Dayspring I and II, Abana and Kwa Island were not ceded under the ICJ judgment,” the communiqué stated.

The group further emphasized that Nigeria still maintains maritime boundary continuity between the Cross River Estuary and the Akwayefe River Estuary based on the ICJ cartographic evidence and the physical geography of the region.

Dr. Nwambu also clarified that the Cross River Estuary remains Nigeria’s natural maritime gateway to the Atlantic Ocean and provides Cross River State with direct offshore access.

Questions Over Boundary Management

A major concern raised by the coalition relates to the actions of the National Boundary Commission (NBC) in implementing the Offshore/Onshore Dichotomy Abrogation Act using what it described as a temporary implementation map.

According to the communiqué, the baseline drawn from Tom Shot into the Cross River Estuary effectively closed the estuary’s mouth to the sea, thereby rendering Cross River State non-littoral.

The coalition warned that this development raises serious constitutional, economic and national security concerns.

It further criticized the NBC for failing to demarcate the Nigeria–Cameroon maritime boundary more than two decades after the ICJ ruling, stating that continued reliance on the temporary map could jeopardize Nigeria’s territorial integrity.

The report also alleged that the situation has effectively resulted in the ceding of about 780 hectares of maritime waters within the Cross River Estuary toward the Akwayefe River Estuary to Cameroon.

Oil Wells and Revenue Concerns

Beyond boundary issues, the civil society coalition raised alarm over oil revenue allocation and the management of transboundary oil fields.

According to the findings, the failure of relevant institutions to brief the President on key inter-agency reports could prevent Nigeria from exploiting 49 identified transboundary oil wells located within OML 114 in the Cross River Estuary.

The coalition also raised concerns over alleged financial irregularities relating to the Ekanga and Zafiro transboundary oil fields jointly developed by Nigeria and Equatorial Guinea.

It alleged that more than ₦33 billion may have been approved from the Federation Account in favour of Akwa Ibom State without clear presidential authorization.

The group further questioned whether revenues from the Ekanga and Zafiro fields — estimated at over $8 billion — had been properly remitted into the Federation Account.

Call for Presidential Intervention

To address the concerns, the coalition recommended several urgent measures, including a presidential review of the 2024 and 2025 inter-agency oil verification reports affecting Cross River and Akwa Ibom states.

It also called for the proper demarcation of the Nigeria–Cameroon maritime boundary in line with the ICJ judgment and the establishment of a Presidential Special Investigation Panel to probe the alleged loss of Nigerian maritime waters.

Other recommendations include a forensic audit of revenues from the Ekanga and Zafiro oil fields, investigation into the alleged ₦33 billion payment approvals, and diplomatic engagement with Cameroon to develop transboundary reservoir agreements.

The coalition also urged the Federal Government to restore and recognize Cross River State’s littoral status based on the geographic and legal status of the Cross River Estuary.

National Security Implications

In its concluding remarks, the coalition warned that the issues uncovered during the verification mission have far-reaching implications for Nigeria’s territorial integrity, maritime sovereignty, national security and oil revenue accountability.

Dr. Nwambu called on the President to treat the matter with urgency, stressing that transparent management of maritime boundaries and offshore resources remains critical to Nigeria’s economic stability and geopolitical standing.

The communiqué was jointly signed by representatives of the coalition of civil society organizations, maritime policy experts, technical observers and economic governance accountability groups.

Continue Reading

News

Nigerian Youth Storm National Assembly Demands Access to Present Dishonourable Award to Senator

Published

on

By

Nigerian Youth under the leadership of Empowerment for Unemployed Youth Initiative (EUYI) on Tuesday stormed the National Assembly to present Senator Olajide Ipinsagba with the Most Dishonourable Senator of the year award.

EUYI previously threatened to present the Senator with the award, citing a plethora infractions and unwholesome dealings especially with his legislative aids and associates.

The group urged the Senate President to grant them access to the hallowed chambers to make the presentation as wake up call to other public servants.

Addressing the press at the National Assembly complex, Comrade Danesi Momoh Prince disclosed that they had gathered as early as 7 am at the National Assembly gate only to discover that the Senate is not sitting and that the embattled Senator was absent despite prior information.

“We’re angry that Senator Olajide Ipinsagba has refused to show up and collect his award for his dishonourable conduct especially as it pertains the exploitation and underemployment of Nigeria youth under his office

“How can a Senator be paying his legislative aid 30,000 naira when the national minimum wage is 70,000 Naira? Is he the only one that needs money? Is it not wickedness to treat unemployed Nigerian youth like that?”, he queried.

The group vowed to go ahead and present the award to the Senator in person, be it in the Senate Chambers or his house. We shall however not give the award to anybody but the senator due to the “seriousness of his offense”

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2017 Zox News Theme. Theme by MVP Themes, powered by WordPress.