News
Can the fresh charges by EFCC filed against Obla, SAN stand in law?
A Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) Godwin Obla has filed an application before Justice Rilwan Aikawa of the Federal High Court in Lagos seeking to be tried separately in the charge filed against him and Justice Rita Ofili-Ajumogobia.
The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) charged both for money laundering, to which they pleaded not guilty.
Obla was a former EFCC prosecutor for several years; he represented the commission in several asset recovery proceedings and is presently suing EFCC over non-payment for services rendered.
The SAN is praying the court to quash the charge numbered FHC/139C/19 for being an abuse of court process.
Alternatively, he is praying the court to separate trial, contending that only counts 1, 2 and 3 of the 18-count charge affect him.
Obla’s counsel Chief Ferdinand Orbih (SAN) urged the court to hear his client’s application before proceeding with the trial.
He argued that the application was not challenging the charge’s validity, and therefore does ot fall within the contemplation of Section 396 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA).
The section provides that a ruling on an application challenging the validity of a charge shall be at the end of trial.
“The application is not a challenge to the validity of the charge, but a challenge to the use the charge is being put, hence our contention that it is an abuse.
“The second defendant (Obla) has put in materials to show that the matter is on appeal. It is an issue that should be determined first.
“This application is peculiar. We’re saying that the use of the process of court is abusive and oppressive having regard to the appeal.
“The second defendant is also asking for a separate trial, which cannot be determined at the end of trial. We urge the court to grant the adjournment so that issues can be properly joined,” he said.
Obla’s application is premised on the fact that an appeal is currently pending at the Court of Appeal, Lagos Division on the outcome of a previous trial at the Lagos State High Court.
According to him, it is respect of the same subject matter as the charge now before the Federal High Court.
In a Motion on Notice filed by Obla’s other counsel Chief Ifedayo Adedipe (SAN), he urged the court to quash the charge or in the alternative split the charge by permitting his separate trial on counts 1, 2 and 3.
The application is on the ground that there is a pending notice of appeal dated and filed on April 16 against the Lagos High Court decision.
The notice of appeal, according to Adedipe, was served on the EFCC on the same day, but the commission filed the charge on April 17.
Adedipe submitted that continuing with Obla’s trial during the pendency of his appeal would be an abuse of court process.
“Counts 1, 2 and 3 of the charge before the court are in respect of the exact same subject-matter of counts 1, 2, 3 and 4 of the amended information filed at the Lagos State High Court in charge no: ID/3671c/16 and form the substance of the subject matter of the second defendant/applicant’s pending appeal in appeal no: CA/LAG/CR/517/2019,” he said.
Adedipe argued that continuing with Obla’s trial at the Federal High Court on the same-subject matter as his pending appeal is calculated to overreach him in the prosecution of his appeal and to render its outcome worthless.
EFCC had previously tried Justice Ofili-Ajumogobia and Obla before Justice Hakeem Oshodi of the Lagos State High Court, Ikeja, on a 31-count amended information dated February 21, 2018.
The prosecution had initially arraigned the defendants on 30-count information filed on November 17, 2016.
During the trial, EFCC called 14 witnesses and eventually closed its case on September 14, 2018.
Obla filed a no-case submission on the same date seeking an order of acquittal on the ground that the prosecution did not provide sufficient case to warrant a defence.
Justice Ofili-Ajumogobia challenged the court’s jurisdiction on the ground that, being a judicial officer and by virtue of the judgment of the Court of Appeal in the case of Nganjiwa V FRN (delivered on December 11, 2017), the charge against her could not have been filed until after disciplinary action had been taken against her by the National Judicial Council (NJC).
EFCC’s Counsel, Rotimi Oyedepo agreed that the court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the charge.
“In urging your Lordship to strike out the charge, we concede…in view of the fact that the decision in Nganjiwa’s case is still the law,” he said.
On April 16, Justice Oshodi struck out the 31-count charge on the grounds that the court lacked jurisdiction to hear the suit.
The judge ruled that based on the judicial precedent set by the case of Justice Nganjiwa Vs FRN, the EFCC had “jumped the gun” in filing the first amended charge.
Justice Oshodi noted that the anti-graft commission had not followed NJC procedures in disciplining erring judicial officers.
The judge added: “One would have thought that the prosecution would have urged the court to strike out the case as a consequence of the decision of the Court of Appeal. But no! The prosecution still persisted, like a bull running amok, amended the Information and called two further witnesses.
“It ought to be pointed out for record purpose that a counsel is a minister in the temple of justice and as an officer of the court, a counsel has a duty to assist the court rather than mislead it.”
Meanwhile, Obla sued the EFCC before the Justice V.B. Ashi of the High Court of the FCT.
He is praying for outstanding professional fees owed to him by the commission over the period of five years to the tune of N685,389,928.10.
The SAN contended that for the five years he was prosecuting for the EFCC, he consistently moved from one courtroom to the other prosecuting corruption-related cases for the EFCC and obtaining the forfeiture of cash and assets running into several billions of Naira.
Obla claims that EFCC has not only refused to pay his professional fees and settle his expenses for the over 40 cases he successfully handled for the commission.
He claimed that as soon as a new leadership was appointed to head the anti-graft agency, the table turned and he became the hunted.
According to him, he was severally invited over his perceived role in the Halliburton case, for which he was appointed by the former Attorney General Federation and Minister of Justice, Mohammed Bello Adoke (SAN).
He said he was part of a legal team that negotiated the plea bargain agreements with the companies involved in the scandal, which culminated in the recovery of the sum of $200 million for the Federal Government.
News
RED ALERT: Borno Under Tight Security Cordon
.
☆☆As Reports inficate Possible Insurgent Threats.
By: Special Correspondent.
In apparent response to recent security developments relating to insurgent movements and emerging operational concerns within the Maiduguri, the Borno State Capital and surrounding areas, security operatives have been placed on red alert.
Our correspondent gathered over the past few days indicate that insurgent elements have been attempting to regroup and reorganise their activities in across the state, especially around Maiduguri metropolitan axis.
This is even as the Borno State Government have assured of adequate security arrangements to ward off any possible security threat.
According to findings, these developments have generated growing concern among local communities and security observers, who in turn called the attention of the Borno state government..
Although intelligence monitoring over the last three days,indicates reduction in their vissible activities, owing to patrols by security personnel and frontline defence groups, the city remains under intense watch..l
Further reports available to us indicate that some of the insurgent elements were sighted operating around Duwari village under Konduga Local Government Area, where they appear to be attempting to regroup and reposition themselves, for possible mischief during the upcoming Eid prayer gatherings, which they may perceive as opportunities to exploit large public gatherings.
Highly placed security source told our correspondent that, the current surveillance and intelligence monitoring across the state by soldiers, members of the Civilian Joint Task Force (CJTF), and other frontline defenders remains a capable check against any mischief.
“Our level of preparedness against any mischief remains on high and we are prepared to confront any insurgent threat should the situation call for it”.
“Only a few days ago, insurgent elements made an attempt to regroup in some areas around Maiduguri Metropolitan and Konduga, and upon receiving credible intelligence regarding their presence and movements, we immediately moved in with our swift operational response team”, the source added.
While reassuring that available security assets, including soldiers and members of the Civilian Joint Task Force (CJTF), are capable of confronting any insurgent group, our source, said, any attempt by any group to come into Maiduguri, will amount to “a suicide mission”, on their part.
Our correspondent further reports that, the Borno state Government has in the last few weeks provided enormous logistics and equipment to security operatives in what looks like a renewed fight against Boko Haram and ISWAP elements, who have been attempting a resurgence in activities.
Reports across Borno state indicate that, Boko Haram and ISWAP terrorists, who have been fleeing their enclaves following intense attacks on them by troops, have in the process been attacking vulnerable communities in search of food and other logistics.
Reports say most of their camps have been destroyed, and they are desperately making attempts at re-entering Maiduguri.
Camps around the notorious Sambisa forest are said to have been vacated ahead of oncomming onslaughts and the terrorists have retreated and fled into the Mandara mountains close to Nigeria’s border with Cameroun.
Subsequent surveillance checks conducted through intelligence monitoring channels confirmed that the fleeing elements were attempting to regroup in nearby locations, suggesting a continued attempt to maintain an operational presence within some areas.
Borno state Governor, Professor Babagana Umara Zulum, who recently concluded a statewide tour has expressed concerns about the operational coordination among community-based security groups, with a promuse to ginger them up for more action.
As a result, several community defence formations operate simultaneously, including, the Civilian Joint Task Force (CJTF), Hunters,Vigilante groups
and other local frontline defenders.
He has vowed to flush out, what inteligence observers, described as certain individuals within these formations, who may have indirect alignments or may be responsible for information leakages that could potentially compromise ongoing security operations.
The inteligence circle in Borno has often complained that, insurgent elements appear to have prior knowledge of local security movements and response patterns, even as it raised concerns about possible infiltration or operational compromise within these community security structures.
Governor Zulum, during his recent tour promised to remedy the situation, after a careful institutional review and restructuring in order to strengthen operational discipline and reduce vulnerabilities within the community defence architecture.
Information available to us indicate that, certain
security measures are being contemplateded for Maiduguri during the Eid celeberations, which may include strict monitoring of vehicular and human movements to minimize potential vulnerabilities that hostile elements could exploit to infiltrate the city.
While physical security alert remains in place, this medium gathered that, intelligence gathering is being strengthened and early warning mechanismsactivated across Maiduguri.
In the face of these, uneasy calm still pervade the citizenry as they prepare for the oncoming celeberations.
News
Dogara Celebrates Baba Jang at 82, Hails Him as a Visionary Statesman
Former Speaker of the House of Representatives and Chairman, Board of Trustees of the National Credit Guarantee Company Limited (NCGC), Rt. Hon. Yakubu Dogara, has joined Nigerians in celebrating Former Governor Jonah Jang, fondly called Baba Jang, as he clocks 82 years.
In a glowing tribute, Dogara described Baba Jang as a visionary leader whose life and service remain a beacon of hope for generations. He noted that Jang’s tenure as Governor of Plateau State was marked by courage, foresight, and an unwavering commitment to peace, unity, and development.
“Baba Jang’s life is a testimony of service and sacrifice. He invested in infrastructure, strengthened institutions, and worked tirelessly to foster unity in Plateau State. His leadership was never about personal gain but about building lasting foundations for progress,” Dogara said.
He further emphasized that Jang’s integrity, resilience, and mentorship have shaped leaders across Nigeria, adding that his legacy continues to inspire beyond the boundaries of Plateau State.
“As he celebrates 82 years, we honor him not just for the offices he has held, but for the enduring impact he has made on countless lives. Baba Jang remains a statesman, a father figure, and a model of quality leadership,” Dogara added.
The tribute underscores Baba Jang’s enduring influence in Nigerian politics and governance, highlighting his role as a leader whose footprints on the sands of time cannot be erased.
News
Civil Society Coalition Raises Alarm Over Nigeria’s Maritime Boundaries, Oil Wells Allocation
A coalition of Civil Society Organizations (CSOs), maritime experts and policy advocates has raised serious concerns over Nigeria’s maritime boundary management and the allocation of offshore oil wells, calling for urgent intervention by the Federal Government.
The concerns were presented on Thursday in Abuja during a civil society roundtable where the coalition leader, Dr. Gabriel Nwambu, addressed stakeholders and unveiled the communiqué issued after a recent verification mission to Nigeria’s offshore maritime corridor bordering Cameroon and Equatorial Guinea.
The communiqué followed a technical fact-finding and verification exercise conducted at sea on February 28, 2026, focusing on Nigeria’s offshore hydrocarbon blocks OML 114, OML 115 and OML 123 as well as the maritime boundary areas involving Nigeria, Cameroon and Equatorial Guinea.
Dr. Nwambu explained that the mission involved maritime governance stakeholders, mapping professionals and public policy experts who undertook physical observation of the maritime corridor, technical mapping verification and consultations with relevant authorities.
According to the coalition, the mission sought to independently verify the status of Nigeria’s maritime boundaries, offshore hydrocarbon entitlements and the implications of administrative and regulatory decisions affecting the Cross River maritime corridor.
ICJ Judgment Clarified
Presenting the findings, the coalition noted that the 2002 judgment of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) between Nigeria and Cameroon ceded only specific settlements in the southern Bakassi Peninsula — Atabong, Akwabana and Archibong Town — to Cameroon.
The coalition stressed that several areas often assumed to have been ceded were not included in the ruling.
“The Cross River Estuary and the western Bakassi peninsular islands of Dayspring I and II, Abana and Kwa Island were not ceded under the ICJ judgment,” the communiqué stated.
The group further emphasized that Nigeria still maintains maritime boundary continuity between the Cross River Estuary and the Akwayefe River Estuary based on the ICJ cartographic evidence and the physical geography of the region.
Dr. Nwambu also clarified that the Cross River Estuary remains Nigeria’s natural maritime gateway to the Atlantic Ocean and provides Cross River State with direct offshore access.
Questions Over Boundary Management
A major concern raised by the coalition relates to the actions of the National Boundary Commission (NBC) in implementing the Offshore/Onshore Dichotomy Abrogation Act using what it described as a temporary implementation map.
According to the communiqué, the baseline drawn from Tom Shot into the Cross River Estuary effectively closed the estuary’s mouth to the sea, thereby rendering Cross River State non-littoral.
The coalition warned that this development raises serious constitutional, economic and national security concerns.
It further criticized the NBC for failing to demarcate the Nigeria–Cameroon maritime boundary more than two decades after the ICJ ruling, stating that continued reliance on the temporary map could jeopardize Nigeria’s territorial integrity.
The report also alleged that the situation has effectively resulted in the ceding of about 780 hectares of maritime waters within the Cross River Estuary toward the Akwayefe River Estuary to Cameroon.
Oil Wells and Revenue Concerns
Beyond boundary issues, the civil society coalition raised alarm over oil revenue allocation and the management of transboundary oil fields.
According to the findings, the failure of relevant institutions to brief the President on key inter-agency reports could prevent Nigeria from exploiting 49 identified transboundary oil wells located within OML 114 in the Cross River Estuary.
The coalition also raised concerns over alleged financial irregularities relating to the Ekanga and Zafiro transboundary oil fields jointly developed by Nigeria and Equatorial Guinea.
It alleged that more than ₦33 billion may have been approved from the Federation Account in favour of Akwa Ibom State without clear presidential authorization.
The group further questioned whether revenues from the Ekanga and Zafiro fields — estimated at over $8 billion — had been properly remitted into the Federation Account.
Call for Presidential Intervention
To address the concerns, the coalition recommended several urgent measures, including a presidential review of the 2024 and 2025 inter-agency oil verification reports affecting Cross River and Akwa Ibom states.
It also called for the proper demarcation of the Nigeria–Cameroon maritime boundary in line with the ICJ judgment and the establishment of a Presidential Special Investigation Panel to probe the alleged loss of Nigerian maritime waters.
Other recommendations include a forensic audit of revenues from the Ekanga and Zafiro oil fields, investigation into the alleged ₦33 billion payment approvals, and diplomatic engagement with Cameroon to develop transboundary reservoir agreements.
The coalition also urged the Federal Government to restore and recognize Cross River State’s littoral status based on the geographic and legal status of the Cross River Estuary.
National Security Implications
In its concluding remarks, the coalition warned that the issues uncovered during the verification mission have far-reaching implications for Nigeria’s territorial integrity, maritime sovereignty, national security and oil revenue accountability.
Dr. Nwambu called on the President to treat the matter with urgency, stressing that transparent management of maritime boundaries and offshore resources remains critical to Nigeria’s economic stability and geopolitical standing.
The communiqué was jointly signed by representatives of the coalition of civil society organizations, maritime policy experts, technical observers and economic governance accountability groups.
-
Uncategorized5 years agoFG, states urged to harness flooding for ranching, others with technology – Agbaje
-
Headlines10 years agoBreaking: EFCC seals Borno House of Assembly, as Hon members take to their heels
-
News12 years agoNigeria Security Operatives Stage Manhunt For Homosexual Perpetrator
-
News9 years agoHow 21-year-old Girl fled community over accusation of lesbianism
-
News10 years agoYobe Gov Moves Against Deputy
-
Opinion7 years ago7 signs she has friend zoned you
-
Technology4 years ago
Online job placement company headhunts women
-
Headlines10 years agoBorno Dep Gov Abducts Another Church Leader
