Uncategorized
Kidnapping: Senate Insists on Death Penalty for Perpetrators, Financiers, Informants
By Hassan Taiye
In its efforts to decisively address the spate of insecurity nationwide, the Senate Wednesday extensively debated the proposed amendment to the 2022 Terrorism (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, insisting on prescribing death penalty for kidnappers and anyone who knowingly assists, facilitates, or supports kidnapping operations.
The upper chamber also unanimously agreed to the proposals that would authorise law enforcement agencies to dismantle kidnapping networks by enabling stronger enforcement as well as placing kidnapping under the terrorism framework anywhere in the federation.
Led by Leader of the Senate, Senator Opeyemi Bamidele, the debate took place at the plenary on Wednesday with contributions from Chairman, Senate Committee on Interiors, Senator Adam Oshomhole; Chairman, Senate Committee on South-East Development Commission, Senator Orji Uzor Kalu and Minority Leader of the Senate, Senator Abba Moro, among others.
After exhaustive debates across the political divides at its Chamber, the senate, presided over by the President of the Senate, Senator Godswill Akpabio, unanimously approved amendments to the he Terrorism (Prevention and Prohibition) Act as proposed by the senate leader.
Consequently, Akpabio referred the bill to the Committee on Judiciary, Human Rights and Legal Matters, Committee on National Security and Intelligence as well as the Committee on Interior for further consultation and fine tuning at the public hearing.
While he noted that the Committee on Judiciary, Human Rights and Legal Matters would be the lead committee, Akpabio mandated the committees to report back to the Senate in two weeks.
Leading debate on the bill Wednesday, Bamidele explained the essence of the amendment was to designate kidnapping, hostage-taking and related offences as acts of terrorism and prescribe the death penalty for such offences without option of fine or alternative sentence; and for related matters.
He justified the gravity of the prescribed penalty for kidnapping, hostage-taking and other related offences, noting that such offences “have become one of the most pervasive and destructive crimes in our nation today. What were once isolated incidents have escalated into coordinated, commercialised, and militarised acts of violence perpetrated by organised criminal groups .
Across every region of our country, the senate leader argued that kidnapping “has instilled widespread fear in communities; undermined national economic activities and agricultural output; interrupted children’s education; bankrupted families forced to pay ransom; overstretched our security forces, and claimed countless innocent lives.
He, further, argued that the patterns of organisation, brutality, and destabilisation associated with kidnapping “now carry all the characteristics of terrorism. It is no longer adequate to treat these acts as ordinary criminal offences. The legal framework must reflect the true magnitude of the threat.”
Having the collateral consequence of kidnapping and hostage-taking on family, economy and polity, Bamidele said the bill was designed to designate kidnapping and hostage-taking as acts of terrorism.
He, therefore, noted that classifying kidnapping, hostage-taking and other related offences as acts of terrorism would no doubt empower our security agencies with broader operational authority, intelligence capabilities, and prosecutorial tools available under counter-terrorism law.
Besides designating kidnapping as acts of terrorism, Bamidele said the bill prescribed death penalty “not only for the perpetrators and financiers of such heinous acts, but also for their informants, logistics providers, harbourers, transporters, and anyone who knowingly assists, facilitates, or supports kidnapping operations.
“Attempt, conspiracy, or incitement to kidnap attracts the same penalty. This strong deterrent is necessary to confront kidnapping at the scale it currently operates,” the senate leader pointed out with the resolve to strengthen internal peace and stability.
He also noted that the bill was aimed “at dismantling kidnapping networks by enabling stronger enforcement: By placing kidnapping under the terrorism framework, agencies can pursue asset tracing and forfeiture, intelligence-led operations, inter-agency coordination, swift pre-trial procedures under terrorism laws and disruption of funding and logistics chains.”
While urging his colleagues, Bamidele pointed out that Nigerians “are kidnapped on highways, in schools, in homes, on farms, and in markets. Innocent children, vulnerable women, hardworking men, traditional rulers, travelers, and public servants have all become targets.
“These criminals kill victims even after ransom is paid; subject victims to brutal torture; rape, mutilate, and starve hostages and use ransom proceeds to fund more weapons and more crimes. This is not a mere crime. It is terrorism in its purest form.
“Our moral, constitutional, and legislative duty is to protect Nigerian lives. If an offence repeatedly results in mass murder, mass fear, mass displacement, and systemic destabilization, then the strongest legal sanction becomes necessary
“This Bill does not target communities or innocent persons. It targets violent offenders and the networks that enable them. All prosecutions will still comply with constitutional guarantees, due process, rights to fair trial, and judicial oversight.”
“The menace of kidnapping has reached a level that threatens our national unity, our economic stability, and the safety of every Nigerian family. It is a war on the people, and our response must be firm, decisive, and unambiguous.
Also at the plenary Wednesday, Oshiomole threw his weight behind Bamidele’s amendment to the Terrorism Act, though faulted the deradicalisation programmes, which according to him, had not prevented extremists, hostage takers, kidnappers and terrorists from such heinous crimes.
Oshiomole, thus, said the bill would end mischief in the act of terrorism in which “a terrorist will be arrested and allowed to go without facing consequence of his crimes in the name of deradicalisation
“Some of these guys went back to their crimes. We should not continue with deradicalisation programmes again. We cannot spend so much money on prosecution and the suspects will not face the wrath of law.
“Even the Bible and Quran say those who are killed have no right to be alive.. No more de-radicalization. If you are caught and convicted for acts of terrorism, then the penalty should be death,” Oshiomole said.
Contributing to the debate,Kalu observed that the senate unanimously “agreed with this bill. It is a natural thing for us to approve the bill. As a consequence, informants, sponsors and everybody involved in kidnapping, hostage and other related offence must face the consequence,
“Nigerians have suffered in the hands of kidnappers. Young girls have been raped. Women have become widows for no reason. This must not continue again,” Kalu called attention of his colleagues to untold and grievous pains that Nigerians had suffered.
The minority leader also lent his voice to the bill, pointing out that the bill “is a unanimous decision of the Senate. It is a very straightforward bill, I think we should go ahead and allow this bill to be passed into second reading with the hope that kidnappers will face capital punishment.”
Although he noted that kidnapping had become a business enterprise. More firmly observed that the senate “can never continue to terrorise. Hence, this bill becomes expedient as one of the measures that the senate will come up with to address kidnapping, hostage-taking and other related offenses.
In his presentation, Chairman, Senate Committee on National Population and NIMC. Senator Victor Umeh condemned in strong terms kidnapping and gruesome murder of victims for no just cause.
He added that the trend of such crimes “will no doubt compel men of conscience to rise in support of the bill. They will collect ransome and still kill their victims. We should do everything to amend the Terrorism Act to classify kidnapping, hostage-taking and other related offences as acts of terrorism. We have to go dig into the people who facilitate this criminal enterprise. Financial institutions are also part of it.”
Uncategorized
MINILS DG enumerates issues that will shape Nigeria’s 2027 elections
- Rates Tinubu, AbdulRazaq, Abba Yusuf high on labour issues.
Stephen Olufemi Oni, Ilorin
The Director-General and Chief Executive Officer of the Michael Imoudu National Institute for Labour Studies (MINILS), Comrade Issa Aremu, has enumerated a number of issues that would shape the 2027 general elections in Nigeria.
According to him, such issues include critical labour market issues such as mass decent employment, non- retrenchment, job creation, job security, regular payment of salaries, pension payment and gender equity, adding that the issue of security would equally influence how organised labour and millions of informal workforce would vote in next year’s presidential and state elections.
Aremu, who stated this at two separate labour-related functions in Ilorin and Kano, had led the management and staff of the premier National Institute for Labour Studies to confer the institute’s Fellowship on Kano State Governor, Abba Kabir, for the Governor’s “commitment to decent work agenda of the Renewed Hope Agenda of President Tinubu with respect to public service job creation, job security, pension and gratuities arrears payments hitherto unpaid by past governors”.
The colorful event at the parade ground of Kano State Government House attracted hundreds of pensioners led by the President of National Union of Pensioners (NUP), host Chairman of the Kano State chapter of the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), Comrade Kabir Inua, two former Presidents of NLC, Ayuba Wabba and Abdulwaheed Umar as well as the National Chairman of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Nentawe Yilwatda..
The MINILS boss, who said that singular historic event pointed to labour endorsement of Kano State Governor, Abba Kabir Yusuf, for a second term in office, commended Governor Abba Yusuf for following “the foot print of progressive labour market policies of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu with respect to increased minimum wage, cleared trillion Naira contributory pension arrears, non-retrenchment amidst revenue crisis”.
The notable high-point of the event was the disbursement of the sixth batch of gratuities and death benefits worth N5bn. N33bn has been so far paid by the Governor out of the accumulated pension. arrears.
The National Chairman of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Nentawe Yilwatda, commended the governor’s performance, noting that his administration has met the expectations required of an incumbent seeking re-election, citing Yusuf’s investment in people-oriented programmes and commitment to improving citizens’ welfare as key indicators of his suitability for a second term.
The APC Chairman also pledged support for Yusuf’s re-election bid, alongside that of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu in the 2027 general elections.
Comrade Aremu had earlier observed that Kano State has been historically reputable for labour friendly policies which started with the first late democratically elected Governor Abubakar Rimi, who initiated first May Day in 1980, who also belonged to the People Redemption Party ( PRP) led by late No 1 labour Leader Micheal Imoudu.
In his response, Governor Yusuf expressed appreciation for the endorsement and the honour bestowed on him, pledging continued commitment to delivering meaningful development across the state.
He assured that the people of Kano would support the re-election of President Tinubu, adding that his administration would sustain efforts aimed at improving living standards.
Meanwhile, beneficiaries of the gratuities expressed gratitude to the Governor, with some noting that the payments had eased their financial hardship and restored hope.
In a related development, the Director General has acknowledged the growing positive impact of women in leadership in Kwara State and the country at large.
He made this known during the 2026 International Women’s Day extended celebration organised by the Nigerian Labour Congress (NLC) Women Committee, Kwara State Council, held on Thursday, April 16, 2026, at the Labour House Hall in Ilorin.
Aremu noted that Kwara State has made significant progress in promoting gender inclusion, highlighting that Governor AbdulRahman AbdulRazak has exceeded the 35% affirmative action benchmark for women’s representation in his cabinet.
He also acknowledged the efforts of the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, Bola Ahmed Tinubu, for appointing women into key national positions within the context of Renewed Hope Agenda citing the Head of Service, Mrs Didi Esther Walson-Jack, the Director General of the National Pension Commission, Ms Omolola Oloworaran, and the first female Director General of the Nigerian Law School, Mrs Olugbemisola Odusote among others.
In her remarks, the Wife of the Kwara State Governor, Olufolake Abdulrazaq, emphasised that investing in women and children is essential for building thriving communities. She reiterated her foundation’s commitment to advocating against gender-based violence and addressing the underrepresentation of women in decision-making spaces.
“Women who are empowered with rights and responsibilities become catalysts for transformation within their communities,” she stated.
Earlier, the Chairperson of the NLC Women Committee in Kwara State, Comrade Victoria Agboola, in her welcome address, highlighted the global theme for this year’s celebration, “Rights, Justice, Action for All Women and Girls,” alongside the campaign theme, “Give to Gain.” She noted that both themes underscore the importance of collaboration and collective action in advancing gender equality.
“No woman advances alone, and no society truly progresses when half of its population is left behind,” she added.
The event attracted several dignitaries, including Dr Olufunke Mercy Shittu, Acting Head of Service, Kwara State; Comrade Saheed Olayinka, Kwara State NLC Chairman; Dr Mrs H.T. Umar, President CAILS Women in Academia; Dr Mrs Oyeleke (representing the TUC Chairperson, Comrade Bukola Olowoniyi); Dr Abdulateef Amin of the Ministry of Women Affairs; Engr Olufolake Jimoh of IBEDC; and the State Controller, Federal Ministry of Labour and Employment, among others.
Uncategorized
Niger Delta Ex-Agitators Back Tinubu’s Re-election, Cite Amnesty Programme Expansion
A coalition of former agitators from the Niger Delta region has passed a vote of confidence in President Bola Ahmed Tinubu and formally endorsed his re-election ahead of the 2027 general elections, citing tangible progress under his administration’s Renewed Hope Agenda.
The Coalition of Niger Delta Ex-Agitators for Good Governance, in a position statement issued on Monday, said it unanimously supports the president’s second-term bid, pointing to the expansion of the Presidential Amnesty Programme as a key indicator of inclusive governance.
The coalition noted that the programme, under the leadership of Administrator Chief Dr. Dennis Otuaro, PhD, has been broadened to accommodate previously undocumented, crisis-impacted, and uneducated ex-agitators who had been excluded under prior administrations.
According to the statement, over 10,000 youths have been deployed domestically for educational advancement since Otuaro assumed office, while more than 200 others have been sponsored for specialised studies abroad in fields including engineering, healthcare, and artificial intelligence.
The group also commended National Security Adviser Malam Nuhu Ribadu for his backing of Otuaro’s initiatives , describing the collaboration as instrumental to the relative peace now observed across the region.
“Peace has significantly improved across the Niger Delta region,” the coalition stated, crediting Otuaro’s approach of dialogue, stakeholder engagement, and reconciliation for the shift in the security climate.
While acknowledging that challenges including socio-economic inequality and youth unemployment persist, the coalition said the current administration’s investments in skills acquisition, formal education, and job creation represent a departure from the neglect of previous years.
The group called on all stakeholders across the Niger Delta to unite behind President Tinubu, arguing that continuity in leadership would be critical to sustaining ongoing programmes and advancing what it described as transformative development for the region.
Uncategorized
UNCERTAINTIES OVER PARTY PRIMARIES
☆☆☆ As Parties Narrow Down on Candidates.
By: Special Correspondent.
With the deadline for the submission of candidates for the 2027 general elections approaches, a gale of endorsements sweeping across several states has triggered growing disquiet within political parties, with aggrieved aspirants, stakeholders and supporters raising fresh concerns over alleged imposition of candidates and the steady erosion of internal democracy.
By Hassan Taiye
Across both the ruling and opposition parties, influential political figures, governors, party leaders and interest groups have intensified endorsements of preferred aspirants for governorship, senatorial, House of Representatives and state assembly positions, often ahead of formal primaries.
In Nasarawa State, Governor Abdullahi Sule’s open support for preferred political successor, Senator Aliyu Ahmed Wadada has continued to generate political discussions, with party stakeholders divided over the implications for the governorship race in the state .
Similar situations have played out in other states where incumbent governors are believed to be positioning loyalists to succeed them in 2027.
In Akwa Ibom State, Governor Umo Eno’s political body language and consultations within the ruling structure have also sparked speculations over succession plans, while in Delta State, political watchers continue to monitor Governor Sheriff Oborevwori’s influence over the emerging political permutations ahead of the next governorship contest.
In Lagos State, discussions around the political structure of Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu and key party leaders have continued to shape conversations around succession, just as similar developments have been reported in Kaduna, Kano and Benue where powerful political blocs are already aligning behind preferred aspirants.
The wave ofAs the deadline for the submission of candidates for the 2027 general elections approaches, a gale of endorsements sweeping across several states has triggered growing disquiet within political parties, withh aggrieved aspirants, stakeholders and supporters raising fresh concerns over alleged imposition of candidates and the steady erosion of internal democracy.
By Hassan Taiye
Across both the ruling and opposition parties, influential political figures, governors, party leaders and interest groups have intensified endorsements of preferred aspirants for governorship, senatorial, House of Representatives and state assembly positions, often ahead of formal primaries.
In Nasarawa State, Governor Abdullahi Sule’s open support for preferred political successor, Senator Aliyu Ahmed Wadada has continued to generate political discussions, with party stakeholders divided over the implications for the governorship race in the state .
Similar situations have played out in other states where incumbent governors are believed to be positioning loyalists to succeed them in 2027.
In Akwa Ibom State, Governor Umo Eno’s political body language and consultations within the ruling structure have also sparked speculations over succession plans, while in Delta State, political watchers continue to monitor Governor Sheriff Oborevwori’s influence over the emerging political permutations ahead of the next governorship contest.
In Lagos State, discussions around the political structure of Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu and key party leaders have continued to shape conversations around succession, just as similar developments have been reported in Kaduna, Kano and Benue where powerful political blocs are already aligning behind preferred aspirants.
The wave of endorsements, while presented by party loyalists as strategic moves aimed at strengthening party cohesion and avoiding divisive contests, has instead generated widespread tension in many states where other aspirants view the moves as deliberate attempts to sideline them from the race.
In several states, party offices have become centres of protests, consultations and behind-the-scenes negotiations, as aspirants who feel shortchanged push back against what they describe as predetermined outcomes designed to favour political loyalists and allies of powerful office holders.
Some party members have warned that the growing trend could spark defections, parallel party structures and legal battles capable of weakening party chances ahead of the general elections.
Political observers note that endorsements are not new in Nigeria’s political landscape, but the scale and timing of the current wave have heightened anxieties, especially as many aspirants insist that only transparent primaries can guarantee fairness and party unity.
In some states, youth groups and women wings of political parties have also expressed dissatisfaction, accusing party leaders of ignoring grassroots input and reducing the selection process to elite negotiations dominated by a few power brokers.
A chieftain of one of the major political parties in the North-Central zone, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said the endorsement culture was creating avoidable hostility.
“When candidates are endorsed long before primaries, it sends a message that the process is already concluded. This discourages participation and weakens confidence in the party structure,” he said.
Similarly, some civil society organisations have urged political parties and the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to ensure that the integrity of the nomination process is protected to avoid voter apathy and post-primary litigations.
They argued that credible internal democracy remains the foundation for credible general elections, warning that the imposition of candidates could undermine public trust in the democratic process.
Despite the tension, party leaders defending the endorsements insist that consensus arrangements remain lawful and necessary in managing complex political interests, provided they are carried out within the framework of party constitutions and the Electoral Act.
They maintain that political realities often require negotiations and strategic alignments to preserve party stability and prevent destructive internal conflicts.
However, with the clock ticking toward candidate submission deadlines, many stakeholders believe the coming weeks will determine whether the endorsement wave will consolidate party strength or deepen internal fractures capable of reshaping the political landscape ahead of 2027. endorsements, while presented by party loyalists as strategic moves aimed at strengthening party cohesion and avoiding divisive contests, has instead generated widespread tension in many states where other aspirants view the moves as deliberate attempts to sideline them from the race.
In several states, party offices have become centres of protests, consultations and behind-the-scenes negotiations, as aspirants who feel shortchanged push back against what they describe as predetermined outcomes designed to favour political loyalists and allies of powerful office holders.
Some party members have warned that the growing trend could spark defections, parallel party structures and legal battles capable of weakening party chances ahead of the general elections.
Political observers note that endorsements are not new in Nigeria’s political landscape, but the scale and timing of the current wave have heightened anxieties, especially as many aspirants insist that only transparent primaries can guarantee fairness and party unity.
In some states, youth groups and women wings of political parties have also expressed dissatisfaction, accusing party leaders of ignoring grassroots input and reducing the selection process toj elite negotiations dominated by a few power brokers.
A chieftain of one of the major political parties in the North-Central zone, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said the endorsement culture was creating avoidable hostility.
“When candidates are endorsed long before primaries, it sends a message that the process is already concluded. This discourages participation and weakens confidence in the party structure,” he said.
Similarly, some civil society organisations have urged political parties and the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to ensure that the integrity of the nomination process is protected to avoid voter apathy and post-primary litigations.
They argued that credible internal democracy remains the foundation for credible general elections, warning that the imposition of candidates could undermine public trust in the democratic process.
Despite the tension, party leaders defending the endorsements insist that consensus arrangements remain lawful and necessary in managing complex political interests, provided they are carried out within the framework of party constitutions and the Electoral Act.
They maintain that political realities often require negotiations and strategic alignments to preserve party stability and prevent destructive internal conflicts.
However, with the clock ticking toward candidate submission deadlines, many stakeholders believe the coming weeks will determine whether the endorsement wave will consolidate party strength or deepen internal fractures capable of reshaping the political landscape ahead of 2027.
-
Uncategorized5 years agoFG, states urged to harness flooding for ranching, others with technology – Agbaje
-
Headlines10 years agoBreaking: EFCC seals Borno House of Assembly, as Hon members take to their heels
-
News12 years agoNigeria Security Operatives Stage Manhunt For Homosexual Perpetrator
-
News9 years agoHow 21-year-old Girl fled community over accusation of lesbianism
-
News10 years agoYobe Gov Moves Against Deputy
-
Opinion7 years ago7 signs she has friend zoned you
-
Technology5 years ago
Online job placement company headhunts women
-
Headlines10 years agoBorno Dep Gov Abducts Another Church Leader
