Connect with us

Uncategorized

ORTOM: BENUE GOVERNOR WHO FACED THE TOUGHEST HURDLES

Published

on

By Prince Tyodoo Livinus

His two tenures as the governor of Benue State were marked by significant challenges that badly affected his administration and the state’s development trajectory. His leadership coincided with a tumultuous period in Nigeria’s history, characterized by economic downturns, security crises, and public health emergencies.
That man is Samuel Ortom. He led Benue State between 2015 and 2023.

The above scenario accounted for the difficulty that Governor Ortom experienced in paying salaries, pensions and gratuity regularly. I dare say that no other governor of Benue State has ever faced a quarter of the troubles that confronted Governor Ortom.

He met a state treasury in deficit with a monthly wage bill of N4.1 billion at the state level and N3.7 billion at the local government level. Meanwhile, the monthly allocation to the state had dropped from N5.6 billion in early 2015 to a mere net allocation of N2.4 billion in June 2015. It was therefore practically impossible for the Benue State Government to pay the workers with such a significant deficit. The internal revenue was merely at an average of N250 million monthly.

By the beginning of 2016, no fewer than 27 states in the country including Benue State were owing workers’ salaries and pensioners’ entitlements. Benue, a state heavily reliant on federal allocations, was one of the worst hit.
In the month of April 2016, the federal allocation to Benue State dropped to as low as N1.3 billion!
The situation was that bad! To make matters worse, Benue State had the highest wage bill in Northern Nigeria and the 3rd highest in the country after Lagos and Rivers States.

Despite all those challenges, Governor Ortom, who had made labour leaders a part of the state and local government joint allocation committee for transparency, was managing to pay the workers by combining the allocations of two months to pay. There was no other alternative.

Some states such as Kaduna and Nasarawa opted for a pay cut of 25 percent because they could no longer afford the payment of salaries and pensions.

By 2016, Nigeria had sunk into the first of the two devastating recessions! A barrel of crude oil which was $98.97 in 2014 had dropped to $52.32 in 2015, $43.67 in 2016. it dropped to about $10 per barrel in 2020. Nigeria went into a second recession in 2020 and disbursements from the Federation Account to the three tiers of government plunged by 31 percent.

Benue Pension arrears: clearing the Augean stable

Governor Ortom inherited huge unpaid pensions and gratuities from his predecessor, Gabriel Suswam. The total size of the pensions and gratuity payable by the state government between 2015 and October 2020 alone stood at N68.195. This represented 63% of the 2020 budget. Out of that amount, the state government paid N25.465 billion by the end 2020, leaving a balance of N42.273 billion, made of N14.522 billion in pension arrears and N28.208 billion in gratuity arrears. The government paid a subsequent N3.283 billion (50%) of the average ministry’s budgetary allocation for the year.

For the 23 Local Government areas, the cost of pension, gratuity, death benefits and cumulative pension arrears that Ortom inherited was a whopping N72.456 billion. Out of this, he was able to offset N10.630 billion by the end of his first term in 2019.
This was almost an impossible task to accomplish. It was like an Augean stable. Yet, the arrears must be paid somehow, someday and – possibly – gradually, so that the government could also attend to its other obligations. Yet, serving civil servants continued to retire and add to the existing pension bill of the government.

Aware of the magnitude of the existing and potential challenge posed by the growing pensions and gratuity bill, Governor Ortom adopted a multi-pronged approach to take the bull by the horns. The administration took steps to provide immediate, short and long term solutions to the pension problem, through the establishment of the Benue State Pension Commission (BEPCOM). Modeled after the Federal Government’s National Pension Commission (PENCOM).

The Ortom administration was consistently making its own part of the contributions. By the time he was leaving office in 2023, the state’s pension contributions stood at about N6 billion, waiting to reach the threshold of N10 billion to enable the state government access funds from PENCOM to tackle the pensions and gratuity situation. It must be emphasized that the introduction of the contributory pension scheme did not stop the payment of pensioners by the Ortom administration.

Insecurity: Invasion of Benue

In addition to economic woes, Ortom’s administration was plagued by escalating insecurity, particularly due to the invasion of Benue State by armed Fulani herders. The situation grew dire as herders attacked communities in the state, leading to tragic loss of lives and displacement of over one million people. In response to this crisis, Ortom’s government enacted the Open Grazing Prohibition and Ranches Establishment Law in 2017, which aimed to curb the violence by regulating cattle grazing. However, this move was met with resistance and heightened tensions between the state government and the Federal Government, which was perceived as favouring the interests of herders over the safety of Benue people. Benue had over 1.5 million displaced people as a result of the herders attacks! The humanitarian crisis was devastating and adversely affected the resources of the state government.

The fallout from these security challenges strained Ortom’s relationship with the federal administration led by President Muhammadu Buhari. Ortom’s vocal opposition to the federal government’s handling of the herder-farmer conflict resulted in a loss of support from federal authorities, manifesting in the denial of certain privileges and incentives that other states received. This political isolation compounded the challenges faced by his administration.

Health Crisis and Economic Disruption

The Covid-19 pandemic further exacerbated the difficulties facing Benue State. As with many parts of the country and the globe, the pandemic brought economic activities to a halt, impacting local businesses and reducing state revenues even further. The government’s response required not only the implementation of health measures to curb the spread of the virus but also the introduction of economic relief efforts to support vulnerable populations. Ortom’s administration had to navigate these dual challenges, balancing public health requirements with the urgent need for economic recovery. The COVID emergency also brought with it unplanned spending as the state government had to approve the purchase of expensive health equipment such as ventilators and create fully functional isolation units and other special services to accommodate those infected by the virus.

Time is coming that Benue people will look back at the Ortom years and admit that indeed he faced the greatest challenges as governor of the state. His administration’s legacy is one of resilience in the face of adversity, highlighting the complexities of governance in a turbulent socio-political landscape. The lessons learned during Ortom’s time in office will undoubtedly shape the future of governance in Benue State as it continues to confront ongoing challenges.

The current Governor of Benue State, Hyacinth Alia is the luckiest man to lead the state. He has assumed office at a time when federal allocations to states have tripled since June 2023. He has no reason to owe salaries and pensions or fail to execute projects!
Since President Bola Tinubu removed fuel subsidy in May 2023, federal allocations to the state have tripled. What Benue people want to see is not just the payment of salaries and pensions but the clearing of the arrears of salaries and pensions. So far, the current government of Hyacinth Alia has not shown any sign of fulfilling his promise to clear the arrears, despite getting huge allocations and taking loans more than N130 billion in less than a year.

  • Prince Tyodoo is former Senior Special Assistant to the Benue State Governor.
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Uncategorized

Former Kano State governor and 2023 presidential candidate of the New Nigeria Peoples Party, Rabiu Kwankwaso, has revealed that one of his daughters encouraged him to collaborate with former Labour Party presidential candidate, Peter Obi, during the 2023 general election.

Published

on

By: Fabian Apechihin

Kwankwaso made the disclosure on Monday while speaking on Prime Time, a programme on Arise Television.

According to him, many political leaders in Nigeria have failed to understand the mindset, concerns, and aspirations of young Nigerians, especially in the era of social media.

He explained that younger Nigerians are more interested in competent and effective leadership than the ethnic and religious sentiments that often dominate political discussions among older politicians.

“So many things have changed in this country. You have leaders, many of whom don’t even realize what is happening on social media. We have leaders who hardly have any contact with young men and women,” Kwankwaso said.

“People of our age, my age, or especially the age of Atiku, are very few in this country compared to the younger people. The younger people have their own way of thinking, even our children.”

The former Kano governor stated that even within his family, younger members expressed opinions that reflected a desire for political cooperation and better leadership.

“You will be surprised, even during the 2023 election, in my own house, my own daughter was telling me to go and work with Peter Obi,” he said.

“She didn’t say she was obedient, but she wanted me to work together with him, and vice versa.”

Kwankwaso added that while many older politicians remain focused on religion and ethnicity, young Nigerians are more concerned about credible leadership and national progress.

“So you see, there is a lot happening in this country, but people at that level we are talking about don’t even understand,” he stated.

“People are talking about religion. People are talking about ethnicity. People are talking, especially those at our level and age, but the younger people are looking for the right leadership for this country. And I think they are absolutely right.”

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Uba Sani has dismissed reports of a major crisis within the Progressive Governors’ Forum, describing the recent disagreement among members as a minor misunderstanding.

Published

on

By: Fabian Apechihin

Sani made the remarks on Monday during an appearance on Politics Today, a programme on Channels Television.

Reports had emerged last week claiming that Hope Uzodimma was removed as chairman of the Progressive Governors’ Forum and replaced by Peter Mbah following a tense meeting in Abuja.

The reports also alleged that the forum had split into rival factions. While Uzodimma insisted he remained chairman, another bloc was reportedly aligned with Dapo Abiodun and Abdulrahman Abdulrazaq.

However, governors loyal to Uzodimma later passed a vote of confidence in him during a meeting held at the Imo State Lodge in Abuja. President Bola Tinubu was also said to have intervened in the dispute.

Reacting to the controversy, Sani, who serves as vice chairman of the forum, maintained that no leadership change had taken place.

“At the moment, there’s no problem. All the governors are together. His Excellency Hope Uzodimma is the chairman of the Progressive Governors Forum,” he said.

“My humble self, Senator Uba Sani, is the vice chairman of the Progressive Governors Forum.”

The Kaduna governor stated that disagreements are normal in a democratic setting and should not be blown out of proportion.

“In my own opinion, I don’t think it’s a serious issue, like many people try to make it look like it’s a very serious issue,” he said.

“Because, you know, in everything we are talking about democracy, people can choose to disagree and agree. So, in my own opinion, it was just a slight misunderstanding.”

Sani assured party supporters that the matter had been resolved and dismissed speculation of any division within the forum.

“I don’t think you will hear anything again. I can assure you, you can’t hear anything again,” he stated.

“It’s just a slight disagreement, not a serious issue, but a slight disagreement. But it has been resolved.”

He further added that if there had truly been a leadership change, he would have automatically assumed office as chairman in his capacity as vice chairman.

“And of course, if there’s any change of leadership, sitting here as the vice chairman, I could have taken over,” he said.

“But I can tell you, I was there. And I was the one who made that statement clear that we are united. Everything is okay.”

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Former Vice President Atiku Abubakar has warned opposition parties against zoning the 2027 presidential ticket to the South, arguing that such a decision could make it easier for President Bola Tinubu to secure re-election.

Published

on

In a statement released by his camp, Atiku maintained that fielding another southern candidate against a sitting southern president would be politically ineffective and unsupported by Nigeria’s democratic history.

According to the statement, opposition leaders should concentrate on forming a strong and united coalition capable of defeating the ruling party rather than making what it described as emotional or symbolic political choices.

Atiku’s camp questioned how a southern opposition candidate could realistically defeat a southern incumbent president.

“At the core of the question is: how does a Southern opposition candidate realistically unseat a sitting Southern president?” the statement read.

It further argued that Nigeria’s political history offers no example of such an outcome, warning that insisting on that strategy could amount to entering the election already defeated.

The statement added that if opposition parties insist on zoning the presidency to the South, they might as well allow Tinubu to seek re-election unchallenged by a rival candidate from the same region.

According to Atiku’s camp, such a strategy lacks the political strength, national spread, and electoral advantage needed to unseat an incumbent president.

The former vice president’s camp also criticised supporters of southern zoning, describing their position as “intellectually dishonest” and disconnected from present political realities.

“Defeating an incumbent president requires realism, not romanticism; strategy, not sentiment; honesty, not selective memory,” the statement added.

It urged opposition politicians to decide whether their focus is on making symbolic political statements or genuinely winning power in the 2027 election.

The statement stressed that opposition politics should be driven by practical electoral calculations and broad national coalition-building rather than emotional considerations.

On the issue of fairness and power rotation, Atiku’s camp argued that by 2027, the South would have spent more years in power than the North during Nigeria’s current democratic dispensation.

According to the statement, the South would have occupied the presidency for 18 years, while the North would have held power for only 10 years within the same period.

“It becomes difficult to understand the justice in an argument that seeks to deepen an already existing imbalance under the guise of equity,” the statement noted.

The camp also accused some supporters of southern zoning of selective memory, recalling that many of them backed former President Goodluck Jonathan in 2011 despite calls at the time for power to return to the North.

“It is intellectually dishonest for those who supported a Southern presidency in 2011 to now posture as custodians of rotational justice,” the statement said.

While acknowledging the Southeast’s aspiration to produce Nigeria’s president, Atiku’s camp criticised what it described as “transactional political bargaining” and “symbolic tokenism.”

The statement warned against political arrangements allegedly aimed at satisfying personal ambitions without creating a genuine and sustainable pathway for the Southeast to attain power.

“Principles do not become sacred only when they align with personal ambition,” the statement concluded.

It urged opposition parties and stakeholders to focus on building a broad-based national alliance capable of defeating Tinubu in 2027 rather than becoming distracted by divisive zoning debates.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2017 Zox News Theme. Theme by MVP Themes, powered by WordPress.