News
SOUTHERN BORNO PEOPLE: ON VICTIMHOOD, COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGES AND THE WAY FORWARD
By: A G Abubakar
Fighting against injustice can be likened to being in a ring for a title fight. The boxer uses one hand to jab at the opponent, while keeping the other as a defensive shield. Only an unwise pugilist uses the two hands simultaneously. This strategy equally applies in the struggle for socio-political justice. Here, the defensive mechanism of the “agitator” is his economic independence and/or empowerment. A fallback position in case the process gets long drawn out.
Nothing undermines a victim’s struggle like having to depend on his perceived perpetratior or “marginaliser” for sustenance; the very phenomenon that has made the quest for equity by Borno South region for decades to be very elusive. A situation that has made an otherwise vibrant sets of people to progressively become onlookers in affairs of the very polity they call home. The region needs to rejig, before the agitation becomes all talk, lacking in internal capacity to drive it.
As a refresher, the heyday of the people of Southern Borno was during the era of the North Eastern state (1967-1976). The defunct state was one of the 12 that constituted the entire Federal Republic of Nigeria, and it comprised the current states of Yobe, Adamawa, Taraba, Bauchi, and Gombe. The surface area was so large that no single ethnic group could lord it over others. The Hausa, the Fulani, and the Kanuri in the North Eastern state had almost equal weighting. That provided the smaller groups with a wider surface area and opportunities to operate and thrive with minimum pushback, friction, or discrimination. No one group could claim the ownership of the polity.
Persons of Southern Borno extraction, along other minorities such as Minso Gadzama, Ibrahim Biu, Manasa Daniel, Muhammad Abba Gana, Musa Kida, Azi Nyako, A.D. Mamiso, Abubakar Barɗe, Yerima Balla, Yunusa Kaltungo, Shehu Awak, Maina Waziri, Adamu Fika, Zarma Gogaram, etc, played critical roles in the administrative system of the North Eastern state creditably. They were also never judged by their faith, tribal or idealogical inclinations.They were seen and treated simply as public servants contributing their quotas.
Two subsequent states creation exercises changed the plight of the people but not necessarily for the better. The excision of Bauchi and Gongola into independent states in 1976 invadently made the Kanuri the single most dominant group in successor Borno of 1976 and 1991. With this development came the agenda for the “Kanurisation” of the affairs of the state. It has since been an uneasy relationship between the minority tribes of Southern Borno and their majority Kanuri brothers.
Things came to the fore under the nation’s return to democratic rule in 1999. Democracy, as it were, is a game of numbers, and the Kanuri had left no one in doubt that it is willing to play the game to the fullest. The apparatus of governance and representation have all been skewed away from the South- at times with little sense of proportion or fairness. In a rush to entrench total dominance all known forms of iniquities like quarter, embargo, and suppressions are applied against people of Southern Borno extraction in the state service. Matters of employment, promotion, scholarships and the distribution of both social and physical infrastructure are done in discriminatory fashion.
The development is however consistent with two dictums; power blinds and absolute power blinds absolutely, and the other being, power when acquired, never let go voluntarily. At best, it can be negotiated. But never passed on a platter of gold, even among the minority groups themselves.
Ask the Babur and Bura people of Southern Borno if they would want to cede the deputy governor portfolio to other ethnic groups in the zone, and the answer may turn out to be emphatic, “not yet.” The same thing applies to Gwoza region with regards to the position of a Senator. That’s the reality of politics in Borno State and indeed the entire Federation.
The series of state creation by successive governments instead of addressing marginalisation simply created new tiers of majority groups who oppress some hitherto micro ethnic nationalities with vengeance. Its process unwittingly solved some groups’ problems while subjecting others to greater squeeze, especially under a democratic system, where economic deprivations are rife. As the socioeconomic challenges ensue politics and political power invariably become the most viable, and lucrative, channels of “making it in life” within the shortest possible time. People are forced by circumstances of poverty and ignorance to sell their conscience and rights for a bowl of porridge, called palliative. Voting is simply determined by the stomach.
Concerned individuals have been trying to think of a way out of the stifling situation via a call for a power shift or a new state. Power, can be made, to constitutionally rotate across the three senatorial districts in each or more states to be created. Either move however still requires tinkering with the constitution, which is an onerous task. The glimmer of hope is that Southern Borno is not alone in yearning for a start of its own- Savannah. Other groups (Ogun, Oyo, Imo, Enugu, C/Rivers, Kaduna, Kano, Adamawa etc), who also feel the pinch of marginalisation have been clamouring for a state too. Maybe when such groups team up together an answer can be gotten.The option within reach is to “engage” with the bigger stake holders to see the beauty of being their brothers’ keepers, to allow for power rotation. The current power sharing system in most states doesn’t seem to deliver equitable democratic dividends.
Before this epiphany the affected group (s) needed to get up and make do with their comparative advantages; manpower, fertile land, climatic conditions and drive. The people of the zone should stop playing the victim and leverage these advantages to move on. The journey of redemption may not be easy but many groups facing a similar daunting situation have turned their fortunes around by relying on their innate capacities.The Indians, the Lebanese and back home, the Igbo have been doing just that. It’s a matter of willpower , inspiration and a little shoulder to lean on.
Today, few Igbo chaps graduate and place their hopes on public service jobs. They are also not too fanatical about party politics as they are locked in the pursuit of business interests. They simply move out there and struggle as hard as they can. Most, eventually succeed and as such could lead a convenient life outside politics and politicking. Though at times they could operate unconventionally too, which should be avoided. Regardless, one cannot totally discount the catalytic role of government entirely, especially in the provision of the very basic infrastructure (power, roads, security, etc).These factors are crucial even for persons embracing self development. Be that as it may, people can start and make do with what is locally available, and affordable with the help of those in the “diaspora.”
The opportunities at home are in the areas of agriculture and livestock. Already Southern Borno is the food basket of not only Borno but the other neighbouring states of Yobe and Gombe. A little bit more of support with improved seeds, farm inputs and modern techniques can add enormous value to the local farmers. The culture of keeping birds (chicken), ruminants (goats, sheep etc), and fish farming. The Marghi Special, a fish-based menu is a well-known cousin across the country. In Abuja, a restaurant (Səm Msəra) that is biased towards Biu delicacies pulled a lot of patronage. Such endeavours and many others can be promoted and franchised.
Enhancing the acquisition of vocational skill among the youth in Southern Borno can be a source of both job opportunities and income. Already, major cities in the North like Kaduna, Kano, Abuja, Maiduguri and Jos host many well qualified automotive mechanics and furniture producers. The defunct Santana Furniture Factory in Maiduguri might have inspired the business. We will not forget the famous Ali Pindar Kwajaffah garage in Maiduguri or the Butu Ventures of Ibrahim Butu who pioneered the production of school chalks from local raw materials. The lessons in these areas should not be lost on the young generation. The drive should be maintained, expanded, and pushed further.
Southern Borno people have been trailblazers in the areas of health and education. The famous Mini Haha school in Maiduguri was established by Mr and Mrs. Dikko Askira in the 80s. It was the only private kindergarten in town. The Hərku Hospital in Biu was a pioneering effort too. If persons of Southern Borno extraction could do much things decades ago, there is no reason why the younger generation can not follow suit. The professionals and the well to do individuals should support interested persons to undertake such ventures. It’s a question of counselling, confidence building and access to concessionary resources. It is doable within and outside the State.
For the above initiatives to come to fruition there should be a massive programme of entrepreneurship knowledge impartation in the area. Here the elected members of the zone can play a huge role. Instead of distributing palliative only, they should restrategise their interventions to include well rounded and standard entrepreneurial programmes. They can back it up with starter packs where feasible. The approach can serve double purpose; political visibility and sustainable human development.
Thus, while the politicians keep playing their politics, let the creative energies of the generality of Southern Borno be redirected in economically rewarding activities. The factors and opportunities are all there for the taking. Enough of aspiring for Savannah and Power shift, without doing anything else, especially the much we can collectively do, internally. Let all the endeavours and yearnings go pari passu. It should not be a case of either/or. Again, the region, while acting local, should also keep thinking global.
The icing on the call for Borno South to take the bull by the horn would be the fledgling annual unity festivals of Kiɓaku Day, Marama Day, Minwara of Shani and many more in the pipeline. The yearly Summit too, can provide the necessary intellectual and political touches to the development train. With a prosperous Southern Borno even those hanging on to the status quo for pecuniary interests can afford to join the agitation for equity because they can derive similar benefits on the home front. The people can rise above marginalisation if they so choose to. Let the matching with over two million Southern Borno people begin.
A.G.Abubakar agbarewa@gmail.com
News
AONDOAKAA’S LAWYERS URGE COURT TO DISMISS SUIT CHALLENGING HIS GOVERNORSHIP CANDIDACY
…As Court Reserves Judgment for November 16
The legal team representing the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) governorship candidate in Benue State, Chief Michael Kaase Aondoakaa, SAN, has urged the Federal High Court, Abuja, to dismiss a suit challenging his candidacy for the 2027 governorship election for lack of competence.
Led by Prof. Anthony Ijohor, SAN, the legal team adopted Aondoakaa’s preliminary objection and urged the court to dismiss the suit in limine, arguing that it was not competent to proceed with the case.
The legal team headed by Prof. Ijohor, SAN, comprised other Senior Advocates of Nigeria, including Chiesonu I. Okpoko, SAN, Anthony A. Malik, SAN, and Mohammed Said Diri, SAN. Other members of the team were AT Kohol, Esq, Michael Gusa, Esq, Aleichenu Ogwuche, Esq, AJ Apera, Esq,
Matthew Onoja, Esq, DD Asema, Esq, and HT Ijohor, Esq.
The suit, marked FHC/ABJ/CS/2152/2026, was instituted by David Ejembi, Aondoaver Teryila, Joseph Okpanachi and Benedict Akaazua Orkume against the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), the PDP and Aondoakaa.
At the proceedings, counsel to the PDP, CT Mue, Esq, also adopted the party’s preliminary objection and urged the court to strike out the suit for lack of competence.
Counsel to the plaintiffs, Feng Pwajok, Esq, adopted the plaintiffs’ counter-addresses and written address in response to the preliminary objections. Prof. Ijohor subsequently adopted Aondoakaa’s further affidavit and reply on points of law, while Mue adopted the PDP’s reply on points of law.
On the substantive suit, counsel to the plaintiffs adopted their originating processes, while counsel representing the defendants adopted their respective processes. The plaintiffs’ counsel thereafter adopted further affidavits and replies on points of law filed in response to the submissions of the PDP and Aondoakaa.
Following the arguments, the court adjourned the matter to November 16, 2026, for judgment.
Aondoakaa, a former Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, is the PDP’s duly nominated governorship candidate for the 2027 Benue State election.
News
“WIKE CANNOT CHOOSE A GOVERNOR FOR US!” — Group Rejects Alleged Rainbow Coalition Plot in Benue
The Benue Alliance for Good Governance and Accountability (BAGA) alleges secret political negotiations involving Wike, Akume and Ortom; insists Governor Alia should be allowed to complete two terms if re-elected.
BAGA has raised concerns over an alleged political arrangement involving prominent political figures, warning against any attempt to influence the outcome of the 2027 Benue State governorship election without the consent of voters.
In a statement signed by its President, Chief John Terfa, the group alleged that the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Nyesom Wike, was involved in discussions with the Secretary to the Government of the Federation (SGF), Senator George Akume, and former Benue State Governor Samuel Ortom over a proposed political alliance reportedly known as the “Rainbow Coalition”.
BAGA further alleged that Wike was seeking political control over five states under the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) as part of the proposed arrangement to deliver President Bola Tinubu’s re-election in 2027, with Benue reportedly among the states being considered to hand over to Wike through the Rainbow Coalition.
The group also claimed that the alleged discussions were aimed at securing the emergence of former Attorney General of the Federation, Chief Mike Aondoakaa, as a preferred governorship candidate in Benue under the proposed coalition, despite Aondoakaa being banned from holding any political office for life by Supreme Court, due to unprecedented corruption and abuse of office when he was the Attorney General.
BAGA questioned why political actors from outside Benue should have a decisive influence over who governs the state, arguing that the choice of governor must remain with the electorate.
“Benue is not a political commodity to be traded behind closed doors in Abuja. The people of the state must have the final say on who governs them and the direction their state takes,” the group said.
The organisation alleged that Wike had held a series of meetings with Akume and Ortom in recent weeks to discuss the reported arrangement.
It further claimed that tensions arose during one of the alleged meetings at Akume’s residence in Abuja recently, where Wike was said to have questioned why Akume had allowed Governor Hyacinth Alia to become so politically powerful.
It was alleged that Wike demanded that Akume should make sure Governor Alia is not re-elected or declared winner in 2027 whether he wins or not and boast of having the judiciary under his control.
BAGA rejected what it described as an attempt to determine Benue’s political leadership through negotiations among powerful individuals, insisting that Governor Hyacinth Alia should be allowed to complete his constitutionally permitted tenure, if re-elected in 2027.
The group said it believed Alia’s administration was performing well in governance and development, adding that political alliances should not be used to undermine the democratic choices of the electorate.
It also criticised the record of Ortom’s administration and expressed concern about what it described as divisions within Benue’s political space arising from the influence of powerful political interests within and outside the state.
BAGA argued that any coalition seeking to influence the 2027 election should be based on transparent principles, competence, accountability and the interests of the people, rather than personal ambition or political bargaining in Abuja.
The group also challenged political actors seeking the support of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu to pursue their ambitions without attaching conditions that could compromise the democratic choices of the voters.
“Benue people are politically conscious. They will not surrender their future to a coalition of political interests formed without their consent,” the statement said.
The organisation called on voters, civil society groups and political stakeholders to remain vigilant and defend the state’s democratic rights ahead of the 2027 elections.
“Whatever colour it is given; Rainbow, PDP or otherwise, the people will reject any arrangement that threatens their collective interests and development,” BAGA said.
“Benue is not Rivers and we will not allow Wike from Rivers State to choose a governor for us in Benue State,” the group added.
According to BAGA, the central issue is whether political negotiations in Abuja will respect the right of Benue voters to determine their own leadership.
The group maintains that the state’s governorship should not be decided through private agreements among political power brokers, but through a democratic process in which the people have the final say.
News
2027: Group Defends INEC, Urges Evidence-Based Scrutiny of Staff Redeployments
The Coalition of Civil Society Organisations Against Corruption (COCSOAC) and 33 partner civil society organisations have expressed confidence in the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), urging Nigerians to treat recent reports concerning the commission with caution and rely only on verified facts.
The coalition, in a statement signed and issued in Abuja on Tuesday by its President, Bola Ademola, and National Secretary, Comrade Abdulfatah Aliyu, the group said while INEC must be held accountable where necessary, criticisms of the electoral body should be based on credible evidence, due process and an opportunity for affected parties to respond.
COCSOAC was reacting to an online publication alleging questionable staff redeployments within INEC, including the reported reassignment of a Northern director and the deployment of South-West officials to key departments.
The coalition said it had not independently verified the alleged redeployments or the motives behind them, warning that claims of political interference or ethnic favouritism should therefore not be treated as established facts.
“Assuming without conceding that the redeployments occurred as reported, staff reassignment is a recognised administrative practice that may serve legitimate purposes, including operational efficiency, professional development and improved management,” the group said.
It maintained that the geographical origin or family associations of an INEC official could not, on their own, establish bias or an intention to manipulate elections.
According to the coalition, the more important questions should be whether the decisions complied with applicable rules, received proper authorisation and were based on legitimate administrative considerations.
COCSOAC consequently urged INEC to clarify the circumstances surrounding the reported redeployments where necessary, while appealing to the media and civil society organisations to avoid drawing premature conclusions from unverified reports.
The group also congratulated INEC Secretary, Dr Rose Oriaran Anthony, on her turbaning, describing institutional experience, diligence and administrative continuity as important factors in the management of elections.
It appealed to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu to consider Oriaran Anthony for reappointment as INEC Secretary when her tenure expires, subject to applicable laws and established appointment procedures.
COCSOAC said its appeal was not a demand for an appointment outside the law but was based on the need to preserve institutional knowledge and strengthen coordination ahead of the 2027 general elections.
“Where an experienced incumbent has demonstrated the requisite commitment and competence, continuity may help preserve institutional knowledge, strengthen coordination and support preparations for peaceful, credible and well-organised elections,” the coalition said.
It, however, stressed that any decision on the matter must be guided by legality, INEC’s independence and the integrity of the electoral process.
The coalition called on political actors, civil society organisations, the media and other stakeholders to protect public confidence in Nigeria’s electoral institutions through evidence-based engagement, transparency and respect for due process.
It said its position was not that INEC should be shielded from scrutiny, but that allegations against the commission must be verified and affected institutions given a fair opportunity to respond.
“As the nation approaches another critical electoral cycle, accountability, institutional stability and the rule of law must remain central to the collective pursuit of credible elections,” COCSOAC said.
-
Uncategorized6 years agoFG, states urged to harness flooding for ranching, others with technology – Agbaje
-
Headlines11 years agoBreaking: EFCC seals Borno House of Assembly, as Hon members take to their heels
-
News12 years agoNigeria Security Operatives Stage Manhunt For Homosexual Perpetrator
-
News10 years agoHow 21-year-old Girl fled community over accusation of lesbianism
-
News11 years agoYobe Gov Moves Against Deputy
-
Opinion7 years ago7 signs she has friend zoned you
-
Technology5 years ago
Online job placement company headhunts women
-
Headlines10 years agoBorno Dep Gov Abducts Another Church Leader
