Uncategorized
Nasir El-: Rufai: Human rights Activists, Legal Expert Raise Alarm
By Hassan Taiye
Human rights activists and legal experts have been drawn into the attempts by security agents to arrest Mallam Nasir El-Rufai, the former governor of Kaduna state at the Nmandi Azikiwe international Airport, in Abuja and the subsegments interview on the Arise Television.
In a statement made available to newsmen in Abuja, Barrister Hamza N Dantani, a human rights activist, Lawyer stated that
“The recent development involving former Kaduna State Governor, Nasir El-Rufai, and the National Security Adviser, Nuhu Ribadu, raises serious legal and constitutional concerns”.
According to Barrister Hamza ” At the heart of the matter is El-Rufai’s claim, made during an interview on Prime Time on Arise Television, that he had access to an intercepted phone conversation in which Ribadu allegedly instructed security operatives to arrest him”
“If this statement is indeed true, it triggers profound national security and legal implications. However, if it is untrue or fabricated, it equally demands lawful and professional investigation. What must not happen in a constitutional democracy is the weaponization of the criminal justice system for political vendetta or witch-hunting”
“The fundamental principle of criminal jurisprudence is clear: “he who asserts must prove. “‘ The burden of proof lies squarely on the prosecution. Before any charge is filed, there must be a credible investigation, collection of admissible evidence, and documented statements capable of sustaining a conviction beyond a reasonable doubt”
“If El-Rufai publicly admitted to unlawful interception, the proper course of action would be:
- Invite him for questioning.
- Obtain a written statement under caution.
- Conduct a forensic and technical investigation.
- Identify the alleged “cohorts” or third parties involved.
- Establish the existence (or otherwise) of the alleged intercepted communication.
Charging an individual directly, without painstaking investigation and extraction of evidence, risks collapsing the case at trial. Criminal litigation is not a media contest; it is an evidentiary exercise governed by strict legal standards.
A careful look at the counts filed reveals troubling defects:
Count One
This count alleges that El-Rufai “admitted” to unlawfully intercepting the NSA’s communication and invokes Section 12(1) of the Cybercrimes Act (as amended).
However:
- A media statement does not automatically constitute a legal confession.
- An admission must be clear, voluntary, and unequivocal.
- There must be proof of actual interception, technical, digital, or forensic evidence, not mere inference from an interview.
Without establishing the corpus delicti (the fact that a crime occurred), the prosecution faces serious evidentiary hurdles.
Count Two
This alleges that El-Rufai failed to report the interception of communications, relying on Section 27(b) of the Cybercrimes Act.
Here again:
- Mere knowledge or alleged association does not automatically translate to criminal liability.
- The prosecution must prove actual knowledge of a completed offence and deliberate concealment.
- The identity of the alleged interceptor must first be established.
The charge appears speculative rather than evidence-driven.
Count Three
This count invokes Section 131(2) of the Nigerian Communications Act 2003, alleging compromise of public safety and national security.
This is a grave allegation. Yet:
- Where is the technical report?
- Where is the digital trail?
- Where is the expert evidence establishing interception infrastructure or equipment?
National security offences require the highest level of proof, not assumptions drawn from televised remarks.
There is a growing perception that, in some politically sensitive cases, prosecution is less about securing a conviction and more about subjecting defendants to the rigours of arraignment, remand, and a prolonged trial.
Arraigning a high-profile political figure, taking a plea, and seeking remand, even if bail is eventually granted, can itself constitute administrative punishment. Such practice undermines public confidence in the justice system.
A prosecution that is not evidence-based but strategy-driven risks being viewed as persecution.
If El-Rufai’s statement is false and injurious to national security, the NSA should formally petition relevant security agencies for a comprehensive investigation. If the investigation establishes a prima facie case, prosecution should follow firmly, lawfully, and transparently.
If, however, the charges were drafted without adequate investigation, they risk being struck out for being incompetent or defective unless the prosecution is there for administrative punishment on Elrufa’i
The criminal justice system must not become a political instrument. It must remain a constitutional safeguard.
The issues raised in this matter go beyond the personalities involved. They touch on the integrity of Nigeria’s criminal justice architecture. The law must not be stretched to fit political narratives. Prosecution must not precede investigation. Allegations must not substitute evidence.
“In a democracy governed by law, power must always submit to due process.”
Uncategorized
Lawyer Demands Release of Detained Kano Blogger, Maryam Shehu
By Hassan Agboola
A lawyer and human rights activist, Hamza Nuhu Dantani, has called for the immediate release of Kano-based blogger, Maryam Shehu, who he said has been in the custody of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) for almost 30 days.
Dantani, in a statement on Monday, said the prolonged detention of Shehu was becoming difficult to reconcile with the rule of law and provisions of the 1999 Constitution, particularly her fundamental right to personal liberty.
He questioned why Shehu should remain in detention for nearly 30 days, particularly over an offence he described as ordinarily bailable.
“How on earth can a person be detained for almost 30 days and counting, particularly in relation to an offence that is ordinarily bailable, without meaningful consideration of her liberty and constitutional rights?” he asked.
Dantani said the EFCC’s powers to investigate did not give the commission the right to detain a suspect indefinitely, punish her before trial or disregard her fundamental rights.
He also criticised the alleged practice of photographing persons in EFCC custody and publishing their images online while they remain presumed innocent.
Citing Section 36(5) of the Constitution, Dantani said the law guarantees the presumption of innocence until a suspect is proven guilty by a competent court.
He warned that publicly portraying suspects as criminals before trial could amount to subjecting them to public punishment and humiliation.
“The EFCC is a law-enforcement institution. It must therefore be the first institution to demonstrate obedience to law. It cannot demand respect for law from citizens while appearing to disregard constitutional safeguards itself,” he said.
Dantani urged the commission to either charge Shehu before a competent court if it has credible evidence against her or release her immediately
.
“We call on EFCC to respect the Constitution, respect presumption of innocence and respect fundamental right to personal liberty. Investigation is not conviction. Detention is not punishment. And an allegation is not guilt,” he said.
Uncategorized
Cristiano Ronaldo’s Comment on Lionel Messi’s Tribute to His Dad Becomes Most-Liked Instagram Comment
By Fabian Apechihin
Cristiano Ronaldo’s heartfelt message to Lionel Messi following the death of his father, Jorge Messi, has reportedly become the most-liked comment in Instagram history.
Jorge Messi died on August 7 in Rosario, Argentina, aged 68. Five days later, Messi paid tribute to his late father in an emotional Instagram post featuring a photo of the pair.
In the post, Messi wrote, “Te amo, pa” — meaning “I love you, Dad” — alongside a lengthy tribute reflecting on his father’s influence and the pain of losing him.
Among the many reactions from fans, celebrities and fellow footballers was a message from Ronaldo.
“Un abrazo enorme para ti y los tuyos en estos duros momentos, Leo. Mucha fuerza,” Ronaldo wrote, which translates to: “A huge hug to you and yours in these tough times, Leo. Much strength.”
Ronaldo’s comment reportedly attracted more than 6.86 million likes and over 86,000 comments, making it the most-liked comment on Instagram.
The previous record was also held by Ronaldo, whose comment on Kylian Mbappé’s announcement of his move to Real Madrid reportedly received more than five million likes.
Other football stars also expressed their condolences to Messi. Neymar Jr.’s message, translated as “Much strength for you and your family. Big hug,” reportedly received more than 1.6 million likes, while David Beckham’s comment expressing support for Messi and his family attracted more than 300,000 likes.
In his tribute, Messi described his father’s death as difficult to comprehend, saying he struggled to accept that he would no longer see or speak with him.
Messi also recalled how his father had encouraged him to play at the 2026 World Cup despite his deteriorating health. He said his father had hoped to watch him compete and had planned to travel if his condition improved.
According to Messi, he had promised his father that Argentina would reach the final so he could be there. Although Argentina reached the final, his father was unable to attend.
Reflecting on the loss, Messi said he had wanted to win the tournament and bring the trophy to his father but ultimately struggled physically during the competition.
The emotional tribute highlighted the close bond between Messi and his father and the profound impact of his loss on the football superstar.
Uncategorized
Why Did Senate President, Edo Governor Come to Osun to Monitor Election? – Analyst
By Fabian Apechihin
Aliu Mohammed, Chief Executive Officer of Magnate Communication and Public Affairs Analyst, has questioned the decision of Senate President Godswill Akpabio and Edo State Governor Monday Okpebholo to travel to Osun State to monitor the governorship election.
Mohammed raised the question while discussing political developments surrounding the election during an interview with Vanguard News TV on Tuesday, August 18, 2026.
The public affairs analyst wondered why senior political figures, including the Senate President and a governor from another state, would personally travel to Osun to monitor the election when the All Progressives Congress (APC) already had party officials on the ground to represent its interests.
“Why would people at the level of Senate President, the Governor of Edo State, come to Osun State to monitor an election when you have your party officials there?” Mohammed asked.
His comments came amid discussions about the involvement of senior APC figures in the Osun governorship election. Their presence in the state attracted attention as political parties and their supporters monitored the voting process and awaited the outcome.
Mohammed questioned the necessity of having the Senate President and the Edo State Governor physically present in Osun to observe the electoral process.
He argued that party officials ordinarily have the responsibility of monitoring elections and representing their parties at polling locations and other relevant stages of the process.
-
Uncategorized6 years agoFG, states urged to harness flooding for ranching, others with technology – Agbaje
-
Headlines11 years agoBreaking: EFCC seals Borno House of Assembly, as Hon members take to their heels
-
News12 years agoNigeria Security Operatives Stage Manhunt For Homosexual Perpetrator
-
News9 years agoHow 21-year-old Girl fled community over accusation of lesbianism
-
News10 years agoYobe Gov Moves Against Deputy
-
Opinion7 years ago7 signs she has friend zoned you
-
Technology5 years ago
Online job placement company headhunts women
-
Headlines10 years agoBorno Dep Gov Abducts Another Church Leader
