Nasarawa: Supreme Court Reserves Judgment In Governorship Dispute between Sule, Ombugadu

From Lateef Taiwo

The Supreme Court on Tuesday reserved judgment in the legal dispute on the governorship election of Nasarawa State.

The Supreme Court panel led by Justice Kudirat Kekere-Ekun stated that judgement has been reserved for a later date that will be communicated to parties involved after taking arguments from counsels.

The legal tussle is between the incumbent governor, Abdullahi Sule of the All Progressives Congress APC and the People’s Democratic Party PDP and its governorship candidate, Hon Emmanuel David Ombugadu.

At today’s proceedings, lead counsel to PDP and its governorship candidate, Kanu Agabi SAN appealed to the apex court to set aside the November 23 judgment of the Court of Appeal which upheld Sule as the lawfully elected governor.

He held that the Court of Appeal unjustly nullified the Tribunal’s judgment and unjustly declared Sule as winner of the March 18 gubernatorial election.

He argued that the October 2, 2023 judgment of the Nasarawa State Governorship Election Petitions Tribunal granted in favour of PDP and Ombugadu be restored.

He appealed that the apex Court should allow the votes of Nasarawa state people to count and be meaningful be declaring PDP and Ombugadu as winners as rightly done by the Tribunal.

However, Governor Sule, the Independent National Electoral Commission INEC and APC urged the apex court to dismiss the appeal for want of merit.

APC lawyers, led by Akin Olujinmi SAN while adopting his brief of arguments asked the apex court to carefully looked into the cited authorities to back up their request for dismissal of the case.

Recall that the Appeal Court had on November 23 last year reversed the sack of Gov Sule by the State Election Petitions Tribunal in its judgment delivered on October 2.

The Appellate Court held that the Tribunal headed by Ezekiel Ajayi acted in grave error in using witness statements on oath, not front-loaded as required by law to arrive at the unjust conclusion of nullifying the election of the governor.

In a judgment delivered by Justice Uchechukwu Onyemenam, the Court of Appeal had said the Tribunal was legally bound to act on witness statements filed along with the petition or front-loaded within 21 days stipulated by law.

The Court held that no petition can lawfully be amended outside the 21 days allowed by law as wrongly done by the Tribunal.

“Since the statements used by the Tribunal to sack the Governor were not front-loaded in compliance with the law, the statements were a product of illegality with no probate value for a law Court to act upon”.

The Court also dismissed the over-voting issues used to annul the election, adding that the allegations were not established by law.

Justice Onyemenam held that the petition by the Governorship candidate of the PDP was a nullity and invalid on the grounds that the jurisdictional issues raised by the governor were unlawfully ignored by the Tribunal.

The Court of Appeal ruled that the Tribunal denied the Governor a fair hearing by not considering and making findings on the issues of jurisdiction raised at the hearing of the petition.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *