News
OBASANJO, THE UNWISE KING
By Ademola Adeola
Better a poor and a wise child than an old and foolish King, who will no more be admonished. For out of prison he cometh to reign; whereas also he that is born in his kingdom becometh poor. Ecclesiastes 4:13-14
It seems King Solomon was talking about the likes of former President Olusegun Obasanjo when he wrote the above wise saying. In his recent vituperations, Obasanjo said that Nigeria needs leaders with a ‘Touch of Madness’ to move forward. During his tenure, Obasanjo ruled with raving insanity but did not solve the problems of Nigeria. He recommended executive madness as panacea to the problems of the country. Yet his own psychiatric case did not lead to the recovery and development of the nation. Today, it is obvious Baba’s mental disorder has caused him selective amnesia. He was indeed mad as a leader but did not use that to benefit Nigeria and her people.
Let us remind him that it is his madness that made Nigeria witness absurd political assassinations and unexplained plane crashes that occurred under his tenure. Sudden and mysterious deaths of Chief Bola Ige, Ogbonnaya Uche, Abigail and Barnabas Igwe, Ayo Daramola and many more characterised his madness. In his delirious mindset, he also refused to investigate the issues surrounding the death of his bosom friend, Chief Bola Ige who, to the consternation of the entire nation was killed in broad daylight. In fact, those strongly suspected of murdering Ige were rewarded by Obasanjo. Political figures who directly or indirectly posed a threat to him, including that of Marshall Harry and Funsho Williams were all gunned down. Are these the attributes of the mad leader Obasanjo recommends?
Another case of mental derailment exhibited by Obasanjo was the order to annihilate innocent wives and children in Zaki-Biam and Odi communities. Other recorded massacres were in Igwuruta, Biogbolo Choba and other places in the Niger-Delta. Several hundreds of unarmed Nigerians were killed. His inaction to the plight of the Niger Deltans provoked youths to take up arms against government leading to the destabilising militancy situation in the region. In display of total lack of foresight, Obasanjo transformed a peaceable agitation for equity, justice and fairness in the region into a full-blown war.
No administration after Obasanjo has experienced these kinds of senseless killings and bloodletting. His records of brutality and leadership failure remain unbeatable and matchless. It was also under the watch of this “mad” leader that Nigeria lost its chance to enjoy stable electricity. Reports have shown that about $11b for rehabilitation of the entire power sector was squandered by Obasanjo and his associates. For someone who has a grass to grace story, he lacks empathy in all ramifications. Coming from Prison to the Presidency, one would expect that the plight of the common man would be his priority, but alas, he turned out to be the bane of the poor masses. Not even the Prisons got the required reforms. King Solomon really foresaw this. He captured Obasanjo’s Prison to Kingship status and the impoverishment of common people under him. He became a monstrous leader who made little or no effort to alleviate the sufferings of Nigerians. In transportation, economy, security and provisions of basic social amenities, he performed abysmally yet what fuels the audacious inclination to call out successive administrations beats one’s imagination.
A complete hypocritical failure, having the moral grounds to castigate governments that are trying to clear the large stack of his administration’s mess is beyond outrageous! Obasanjo is so engrossed with power that he engineered the impeachment of number of governors who opposed his dictatorial leadership style. From deposing governors, enforcing state of emergencies to denial of allocations to states, no one has shown disregard for the rule of law like Obasanjo. Chris Ngige, Joshau Dariye, Rashidi Ladoja, Peter Obi and Ayo Fayose were all victims his power drunkenness. No successive President has demonstrated such magnitude of constitutional infractions.
Obasanjo lacks the integrity to haul condemnations. It is now evident that since leaving government, he has been itching to return to power after his third term bid suffered a knock back. It is even more hilarious that he has now resorted to lobbying for interim government by using a long-time associate, Afe Babalola as a front. Everyone knows that he will no doubt appoint his protegees if that proposal were ever to be realised. So who in his animal kingdom does the cap fit? Aliyu Gusau or Sanusi Lamido? Obasanjo is sure looking for a lackey, an oh yes man. But unfortunately, the constitution does not allow for an interim Government. Simple and Short!
Unlike him, the Buhari he constantly criticizes is not given to corruption and self-aggrandisement neither is he planning to extend his tenure. Since inception, the current administration has prioritised security and taken several steps to curtail the growing threat whose foundation was laid during Obasanjo’s rule. Nigerians are not blinded by the truth and his claim that the present administration and its leaders are not doing enough to tackle insecurity. His blind argument could at best be described as clueless and ignorant of a three-time leader of this country. The issue of terrorism is historical and has foundation in the administration of Obasanjo. The Yobe Taliban birthed in his time. He encouraged political sharia as a way of destabilising the North nay Nigeria. He had other reasons for the tacit support he gave Yerima and his cohorts. This was how Boko Haram originated. Obasanjo later pretended to have the magic wand to solve the problems created by the emergence of Boko Haram. But it was late. His visit to the family of Mohammed Yusuf, late head of Boko Haram was a mere stunt. Obasanjo indeed had other hidden interests. Shame! His mischief has festered like a sore; his crocodile tears notwithstanding. Nigeria is actually at the point he desires. But darkness will give way to light.
Obasanjo can say whatever he wants but President Buhari is more an epitome of morality than he (Obasanjo) would ever be. For one, Buhari has never been accused of sleeping with his daughter-in-law let alone canvassing for the construction of a Library in his name with tax payers’ money. Years after leaving office, Obasanjo is only remembered in Nigeria as a brutal and corrupt leader, a lecherous father-in-law who slept with his son’s wife and a bloodthirsty oppressor that masqueraded as a democrat but clearly acted in a manner inimical to national interest. Despite being in a democracy, Obasanjo ruled with military authority and his hands are severely soaked with the blood of innocent Nigerians.
King Solomon going down further, in Ecclesiastes 4:14 stated that a poor but wise youth could rise from poverty and succeed. He might even become king, though he has been in prison. This bible verse would have best suited Obasanjo if only he was a wise youth especially that he rose to the throne from penury. All his successors who are younger than him, can best be described as the proverbial wise youth for not towing the brutish legacy of his tenure. If they had been foolish like him, Nigeria would probably have long ceased to exist. Obasanjo ruled Nigeria like a drunken foolish king and since leaving office, has sustained this careless attitude garnished with incoherent rants. And because he has refused to heed warning, only waterloo awaits him. For the record, Nigeria did not get better under Obasanjo. What is even laughable is that Obasanjo is incorrigible. But he is an unwise King.
As the 2023 elections draw near and several political candidates clamour for recognition and endorsement by political juggernauts, Nigerians need to remember that electing a forward thinking, selfless, rational and progressive leader is the most important. The country needs a leader that is not prone to misplacing priorities or pushed by a Godfather. Nigeria does not need an unwise self-serving King like Obasanjo.
Adeola is a Social Commentator and resides in Lagos.
News
AONDOAKAA’S LAWYERS URGE COURT TO DISMISS SUIT CHALLENGING HIS GOVERNORSHIP CANDIDACY
…As Court Reserves Judgment for November 16
The legal team representing the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) governorship candidate in Benue State, Chief Michael Kaase Aondoakaa, SAN, has urged the Federal High Court, Abuja, to dismiss a suit challenging his candidacy for the 2027 governorship election for lack of competence.
Led by Prof. Anthony Ijohor, SAN, the legal team adopted Aondoakaa’s preliminary objection and urged the court to dismiss the suit in limine, arguing that it was not competent to proceed with the case.
The legal team headed by Prof. Ijohor, SAN, comprised other Senior Advocates of Nigeria, including Chiesonu I. Okpoko, SAN, Anthony A. Malik, SAN, and Mohammed Said Diri, SAN. Other members of the team were AT Kohol, Esq, Michael Gusa, Esq, Aleichenu Ogwuche, Esq, AJ Apera, Esq,
Matthew Onoja, Esq, DD Asema, Esq, and HT Ijohor, Esq.
The suit, marked FHC/ABJ/CS/2152/2026, was instituted by David Ejembi, Aondoaver Teryila, Joseph Okpanachi and Benedict Akaazua Orkume against the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), the PDP and Aondoakaa.
At the proceedings, counsel to the PDP, CT Mue, Esq, also adopted the party’s preliminary objection and urged the court to strike out the suit for lack of competence.
Counsel to the plaintiffs, Feng Pwajok, Esq, adopted the plaintiffs’ counter-addresses and written address in response to the preliminary objections. Prof. Ijohor subsequently adopted Aondoakaa’s further affidavit and reply on points of law, while Mue adopted the PDP’s reply on points of law.
On the substantive suit, counsel to the plaintiffs adopted their originating processes, while counsel representing the defendants adopted their respective processes. The plaintiffs’ counsel thereafter adopted further affidavits and replies on points of law filed in response to the submissions of the PDP and Aondoakaa.
Following the arguments, the court adjourned the matter to November 16, 2026, for judgment.
Aondoakaa, a former Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, is the PDP’s duly nominated governorship candidate for the 2027 Benue State election.
News
“WIKE CANNOT CHOOSE A GOVERNOR FOR US!” — Group Rejects Alleged Rainbow Coalition Plot in Benue
The Benue Alliance for Good Governance and Accountability (BAGA) alleges secret political negotiations involving Wike, Akume and Ortom; insists Governor Alia should be allowed to complete two terms if re-elected.
BAGA has raised concerns over an alleged political arrangement involving prominent political figures, warning against any attempt to influence the outcome of the 2027 Benue State governorship election without the consent of voters.
In a statement signed by its President, Chief John Terfa, the group alleged that the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Nyesom Wike, was involved in discussions with the Secretary to the Government of the Federation (SGF), Senator George Akume, and former Benue State Governor Samuel Ortom over a proposed political alliance reportedly known as the “Rainbow Coalition”.
BAGA further alleged that Wike was seeking political control over five states under the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) as part of the proposed arrangement to deliver President Bola Tinubu’s re-election in 2027, with Benue reportedly among the states being considered to hand over to Wike through the Rainbow Coalition.
The group also claimed that the alleged discussions were aimed at securing the emergence of former Attorney General of the Federation, Chief Mike Aondoakaa, as a preferred governorship candidate in Benue under the proposed coalition, despite Aondoakaa being banned from holding any political office for life by Supreme Court, due to unprecedented corruption and abuse of office when he was the Attorney General.
BAGA questioned why political actors from outside Benue should have a decisive influence over who governs the state, arguing that the choice of governor must remain with the electorate.
“Benue is not a political commodity to be traded behind closed doors in Abuja. The people of the state must have the final say on who governs them and the direction their state takes,” the group said.
The organisation alleged that Wike had held a series of meetings with Akume and Ortom in recent weeks to discuss the reported arrangement.
It further claimed that tensions arose during one of the alleged meetings at Akume’s residence in Abuja recently, where Wike was said to have questioned why Akume had allowed Governor Hyacinth Alia to become so politically powerful.
It was alleged that Wike demanded that Akume should make sure Governor Alia is not re-elected or declared winner in 2027 whether he wins or not and boast of having the judiciary under his control.
BAGA rejected what it described as an attempt to determine Benue’s political leadership through negotiations among powerful individuals, insisting that Governor Hyacinth Alia should be allowed to complete his constitutionally permitted tenure, if re-elected in 2027.
The group said it believed Alia’s administration was performing well in governance and development, adding that political alliances should not be used to undermine the democratic choices of the electorate.
It also criticised the record of Ortom’s administration and expressed concern about what it described as divisions within Benue’s political space arising from the influence of powerful political interests within and outside the state.
BAGA argued that any coalition seeking to influence the 2027 election should be based on transparent principles, competence, accountability and the interests of the people, rather than personal ambition or political bargaining in Abuja.
The group also challenged political actors seeking the support of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu to pursue their ambitions without attaching conditions that could compromise the democratic choices of the voters.
“Benue people are politically conscious. They will not surrender their future to a coalition of political interests formed without their consent,” the statement said.
The organisation called on voters, civil society groups and political stakeholders to remain vigilant and defend the state’s democratic rights ahead of the 2027 elections.
“Whatever colour it is given; Rainbow, PDP or otherwise, the people will reject any arrangement that threatens their collective interests and development,” BAGA said.
“Benue is not Rivers and we will not allow Wike from Rivers State to choose a governor for us in Benue State,” the group added.
According to BAGA, the central issue is whether political negotiations in Abuja will respect the right of Benue voters to determine their own leadership.
The group maintains that the state’s governorship should not be decided through private agreements among political power brokers, but through a democratic process in which the people have the final say.
News
2027: Group Defends INEC, Urges Evidence-Based Scrutiny of Staff Redeployments
The Coalition of Civil Society Organisations Against Corruption (COCSOAC) and 33 partner civil society organisations have expressed confidence in the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), urging Nigerians to treat recent reports concerning the commission with caution and rely only on verified facts.
The coalition, in a statement signed and issued in Abuja on Tuesday by its President, Bola Ademola, and National Secretary, Comrade Abdulfatah Aliyu, the group said while INEC must be held accountable where necessary, criticisms of the electoral body should be based on credible evidence, due process and an opportunity for affected parties to respond.
COCSOAC was reacting to an online publication alleging questionable staff redeployments within INEC, including the reported reassignment of a Northern director and the deployment of South-West officials to key departments.
The coalition said it had not independently verified the alleged redeployments or the motives behind them, warning that claims of political interference or ethnic favouritism should therefore not be treated as established facts.
“Assuming without conceding that the redeployments occurred as reported, staff reassignment is a recognised administrative practice that may serve legitimate purposes, including operational efficiency, professional development and improved management,” the group said.
It maintained that the geographical origin or family associations of an INEC official could not, on their own, establish bias or an intention to manipulate elections.
According to the coalition, the more important questions should be whether the decisions complied with applicable rules, received proper authorisation and were based on legitimate administrative considerations.
COCSOAC consequently urged INEC to clarify the circumstances surrounding the reported redeployments where necessary, while appealing to the media and civil society organisations to avoid drawing premature conclusions from unverified reports.
The group also congratulated INEC Secretary, Dr Rose Oriaran Anthony, on her turbaning, describing institutional experience, diligence and administrative continuity as important factors in the management of elections.
It appealed to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu to consider Oriaran Anthony for reappointment as INEC Secretary when her tenure expires, subject to applicable laws and established appointment procedures.
COCSOAC said its appeal was not a demand for an appointment outside the law but was based on the need to preserve institutional knowledge and strengthen coordination ahead of the 2027 general elections.
“Where an experienced incumbent has demonstrated the requisite commitment and competence, continuity may help preserve institutional knowledge, strengthen coordination and support preparations for peaceful, credible and well-organised elections,” the coalition said.
It, however, stressed that any decision on the matter must be guided by legality, INEC’s independence and the integrity of the electoral process.
The coalition called on political actors, civil society organisations, the media and other stakeholders to protect public confidence in Nigeria’s electoral institutions through evidence-based engagement, transparency and respect for due process.
It said its position was not that INEC should be shielded from scrutiny, but that allegations against the commission must be verified and affected institutions given a fair opportunity to respond.
“As the nation approaches another critical electoral cycle, accountability, institutional stability and the rule of law must remain central to the collective pursuit of credible elections,” COCSOAC said.
-
Uncategorized6 years agoFG, states urged to harness flooding for ranching, others with technology – Agbaje
-
Headlines11 years agoBreaking: EFCC seals Borno House of Assembly, as Hon members take to their heels
-
News12 years agoNigeria Security Operatives Stage Manhunt For Homosexual Perpetrator
-
News10 years agoHow 21-year-old Girl fled community over accusation of lesbianism
-
News11 years agoYobe Gov Moves Against Deputy
-
Opinion7 years ago7 signs she has friend zoned you
-
Technology5 years ago
Online job placement company headhunts women
-
Headlines10 years agoBorno Dep Gov Abducts Another Church Leader
