Connect with us

News

Prudent expenditure and Nigeria’s quest for debt sustainability

Published

on

Prudent expenditure and Nigeria’s quest for debt sustainability

Naira notes

Old naira notes

By Kadiri Abdulrahman, News Agency of Nigeria (NAN)

In recent times, the media has been awash with news about the huge debt burden that the incoming government would inherit from the President Muhammadu Buhari administration.

This started after Buhari signed the 2023 budget of 21.83 trillion Naira into law in December, 2022, and said the country could pay N1.8 trillion in extra interest on borrowings.

Nigeria’s external debt is considered to be the biggest in sub-Saharan Africa. It has already been rescheduled several times.

In spite of the rescheduling and refinancing by creditors who were either members of the Paris Club (governments), London Club (banks) or independent creditors, arrears of this debt kept accumulating over time.

The President, however, justified government borrowing to finance infrastructure, asserting that his government took loans in the interest of the country to solve infrastructure deficit.

“We have so many challenges with infrastructure. We just have to take loans to do roads, rail and power, so that investors will find us attractive and come here to put their money,’’ he told members of the Presidential Economic Advisory Council.

He regretted that the failure to provide the infrastructure for effective transportation deprived the country of its well-deserved status as the West African hub for air cargo transportation and trans-shipment of goods.

The Debt Management Office (DMO) recently announced that Nigeria’s total public debt stock as at Dec.31, 2022 was 103.11 billion dollars.

DMO is the federal government agency established to centrally coordinate the management of national debts.

It explained that the Debt Stock was made up of the domestic and external debt stocks of the Federal Government, the 36 state governments and the Federal Capital Territory.

A breakdown of the public debt stock showed that 37.82 per cent was external, while the balance of 62.18 per cent was domestic.

Findings by the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) revealed that the comparative debt stock for Dec. 31, 2021 was 95.77 billion dollars.

According to the DMO, in terms of composition, total domestic debt stock stood at 61.42 billion dollars, while total external debt stock was 41.69 billion dollars.

It is noteworthy, however, that the debt figure, excludes the N22 trillion Federal Government’s indebtedness to the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), through Ways and Means Advances.

Finance experts say Ways and Means Advances is a loan facility used by the apex bank to finance the government during temporary budget shortfalls. It is, however, subject to limits as prescribed by the constitution.

The Ways and Means Advances are presently awaiting securitisation by the National Assembly, and can only be added to the country’s public debt after such securitisation.

According to the Director-General of DMO, Patience Oniha, the reasons for the increase in total public debt stock were new borrowings by the Federal Government and sub-national governments, primarily to finance budget deficits and execute capital projects.

“The issuance of promissory notes by the Federal Government to settle some liabilities also contributed to growth in the debt stock,” she said.

Oniha, however, assured that on-going efforts by the Federal Government to increase revenue from oil and non-oil sources through initiatives like the Finance Acts and the Strategic Revenue Mobilisation Initiative are expected to support debt sustainability.

She said the recently introduced Medium Term Debt Management Strategy (MTDS) provided a guide to the borrowing activities of government in the medium-term.

She explained that MTDS adequately reflected the current economic realities and the projected trends, adding that its preparation involved the consideration of alternative funding strategies available to the government.

“It seeks to meet its financing needs, taking into consideration the cost of borrowing and the associated risks, while ensuring debt sustainability in the medium to long-term,” she said.

Experts say in spite of the seeming high debt rate, there is no cause for alarm for the economy. The country’s debt-to-GDP ratio of 23.20 per cent remains within the 40 per cent limit self-imposed by Nigeria and the 55 per cent limit recommend by World Bank/International Monetary Fund (IMF).

It is also within the 70 per cent limit recommend by the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS).

According a study conducted by the World Bank, a debt to GDP ratio that exceeds 77 per cent for an extended period of time may result in an adverse impact on economic growth.

Records show that Nigeria’s external debt remained low until the middle of the 1970s. It was 1.5 billion dollars in 1970 and 2.5 billion dollars in 1975.

The situation began to get out of control around 1977 when an outstanding growth rate in the country’s debt became manifest.

The outstanding debt reached 7.5 billion dollars in 1979 and 8.9 billion dollars by 1980.

This was due to excess borrowing from international agencies and countries at non-concessional interest rate as a result of the decline in oil earnings.

It also followed the emergence of high trade arrears due to inability of the country to either produce or foot the bills of importation of needed goods and services.

By 2005, the nation’s debt had ballooned to about 30 billion dollars, mostly borrowed from the Paris Club of creditors.

Nigeria and the creditors’ club then went into series of negotiations on a mutually acceptable relief on the 30 billion dollars debt with the Paris Club.

In October 2005, Nigeria and the Paris Club announced a final agreement for debt relief worth 18 billion dollars. The creditors had cancelled 18 billion dollars and Nigeria repaid 12 billion dollars. Most of the 18 billion dollars was registered as aid.

The deal was completed in April 2006, when Nigeria made its final payment and its books were cleared of any Paris Club debt.

Some Nigerians opined at the time, that it did not make economic sense to pay such huge amounts of Foreign Exchange in one fell swoop just to enjoy debt relief.

They argued that the funds could have been channeled into improving infrastructure and creating enabling environment to attract viable foreign investments for economic growth.

The government of President Olusegun Obasanjo, however went ahead with the payment and exited the country from the huge debt burden of the Paris Club.

The relief, however, turned out to be temporary as, by June 2015, the country’s debt had again jumped to 63.8 billion dollars, representing the country’s highest debt profile since 2007.

An economist, Tope Fasua, advised the Federal Government to improve on the budgeting system to check deficit financing and make the annual budgets more impactful.

“Unfortunately, we have found ourselves in a difficult scenario due to the pandemic and falling crude oil prices and we just have to go borrowing like most other countries in the world.

“Government should ensure that our borrowings are effectively utilised for optimum economic impact,” he said.

Laoye Jaiyeola, Chief Executive Officer of the National Economic Summit Group (NESG), said that, though Nigeria’s debt-to-GDP ratio could be considered low, the revenue that went into debt servicing was still on the high side.

“We should all be worried about the rising debt profile of the country.

“Some people say that the debt-to-GDP ratio is still low. It could be low, but servicing debt is still a challenge,” he said.

He suggested a drastic cut in running cost of governance, reduction in recurrent expenditure, as well as removal of subsidies in electricity and petroleum products, as a way of reducing the debt burden.

As Nigerians look forward to the inauguration of a new government on May 29, stakeholders advise the incoming administration to take aggressive measures to improve revenue generation so as to curb dependence on domestic and external borrowings to fund its annual budgets. (

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

ONE MILLION JOBS VERSUS 100,000: THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A PROMISE AND A PLAN

Published

on

By Aondoakaa Tersugh Daniel 21/09/2026

At the commissioning of the BIPC Bread and Water Factories in May 2024, the Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer (MD/CEO) of the Benue Investment and Property Company (BIPC), Dr. Raymond Asemakaha, said that BIPC needed liquidity of not less than ₦7 billion to stabilise and drive the industrial revolution it was working on. He said the plan was to revamp and build a minimum of 30 industries within the first four years of the administration, with the creation of over one million jobs. This statement was made in the presence of Honourable Hyacinth Iormem Alia and was reported by The Sun Newspaper on 28 May 2024 under the striking headline: “Alia Commissions BIPC Bread, Water Factories, To Revamp Moribund Industries, Create 1 Million Jobs.”

It is imperative to note that the hypnotised “masses” did not doubt the promise of one million jobs when, in practical terms, such a target appeared doubtful from the outset. Yet, as the Alia administration approaches the conclusion of its tenure, that promise remains largely unfulfilled. It is therefore surprising to hear expressions of doubt when Chief Michael Kaase Aondoakaa SAN sets his own target at 100,000 jobs for Benue youths.

The concept of job creation has also been grossly misunderstood because livelihood under this administration has increasingly been reduced to civil service employment. Farming, which used to be the mainstay of Benue’s economy and the principal occupation of many of its people, has been severely affected by insecurity, displacing more than a million farmers from their ancestral communities.

Before the escalation of insecurity, the Zaki Biam Yam Market was reportedly capable of loading about 250 trucks of yam daily. That is no longer the reality today. Therefore, when some people interpret Aondoakaa’s blueprint for 100,000 jobs to mean 100,000 civil service positions, it only demonstrates how much Benue has involuntarily shifted away from farming and other productive economic activities.

If Aondoakaa’s administration succeeds in ensuring that internally displaced persons return safely to their ancestral homes and resume farming and other economic activities, effectively, more than 100,000 livelihoods could be restored among the farming communities currently living in IDP camps. Job creation should not be understood only in terms of government employment. It also includes creating the conditions under which people can return to productive economic activity, establish businesses, farm, trade and earn sustainable livelihoods.

Some allies of Alia have also questioned the operations of MIVA Rice, owned by Chief Aondoakaa. One thing, however, is clear about MIVA Rice: the company has not been accused of owing its suppliers. By contrast, Alia’s administration has faced repeated complaints over unpaid obligations to contractors. Recently, Gerawa Global Engineering Limited complained that the Benue State Government owed the company more than ₦1.5 billion.

From claims of miracles that have been disputed to promises of job creation that are yet to be realised, critics may argue that Alia’s transition from the Church to politics has not changed the character of his promises. But Aondoakaa’s approach is different. When he says he will create 100,000 jobs, the issue should be examined on the basis of the mechanisms through which those jobs will be created.

A target of 100,000 jobs, backed by a credible plan for agriculture, industry, private investment, enterprise development and the restoration of displaced communities, can be assessed against measurable economic realities. That makes it important to distinguish between a numerical promise and a workable economic programme. In that context, Aondoakaa’s 100,000-job target presents a substantially different proposition from the one-million-job projection associated with the Alia administration’s BIPC industrialisation programme.

Continue Reading

News

Customers Raise Alarm Over Sterling Bank’s Alleged Charges, Delays and Deductions

Published

on

By Reporter

Some customers of Sterling bank have cried out over what they described as “poor services, fraudulent deductions, harsh treatment, service delays, and misrepresentation of facts”, by officials of the bank.

In the last few years, Sterling Bank, one of the Holding Companies (Holdco), has faced legal actions and police investigations over alleged unauthorized or fraudulent deductions, including notable cases brought by individual employees and corporate clients. In one instance, the Nigeria Police Force indicted the bank and several executives over alleged money laundering and fraudulent deductions totaling millions of dollars following petitions by corporate customers like Miden Systems Ltd. Plaintiffs alleged unauthorized loan bookings, forged signatures, and blocked accounts.

Also, some of the workers have sued the bank at the High Court and National Industrial Court over ungranted or unsolicited salary loans that resulted in continuous, involuntary deductions from employee allowances and accounts.
But, in these legal proceedings, Sterling Bank’s legal teams filed defense amendments, contest the validity of the claims, or assert compliance with internal loan processing and credit recovery protocols.

Sterling Bank, prides itself as the “One-customer bank”. However, today, it is not only one customer but several of the bank’s customers complain about what they described as the bank’s “persistent deceit, illegal deductions from their accounts and misrepresentation of facts”, giving plethora of instances to back up their claims even as the bank has denied the allegations, stating that it did no wrong.

Sterling Bank started in 1960 as an investment and merchant banking institution named Nigeria Acceptances Limited (NAL), which became Nigeria’s first merchant bank in 1969. It later changed its name to NAL Merchant Bank Plc and listed on the Nigerian Stock Exchange as public Limited liability company. In 2006, NAL Bank merged with four other financial institutions (Magnum Trust Bank, NBM Bank, Trust Bank of Africa, and Indo-Nigeria Merchant Bank) to form Sterling Bank. It also acquired Equatorial Trust Bank (ETB) to expand its national market share and branch network. Recent restructuring led to the establishment of a holding company structure named Sterling Financial Holdings Company (Sterling HoldCo).

Speaking to our correspondent in Abuja at the weekend, a corporate account holder in the bank, Mrs. Obiageri Obiefule, stated that for a long time, customers have been at the mercy of the bank, which she claimed, on a regular basis debit them for all manner of reasons, some of which she said, were questionable and dubious including hidden charges.

According to her, “these charges amount to loss of millions of Naira to us, the bank customers to the effect that sterling bank declare trillions yearly as profit at the detriment of its customers who lacked the voice to complain.

“Even the regulatory agencies seem to be helpless in this situation as they have failed to address our several complaints”, she alleged.

Another customer, Marvelous Okoro also accused the bank of refusing to release her bank statement four months after she applied for it. She alleged that she had been witnessing withdrawal alerts on her account and had applied to the bank for statement of account to verify the transactions, but expressed concern over the bank’s refusal wondering what could be the reason. She said her fear was based on complaints by two of her friends who she alleged had similar experiences with the bank yet to refund the money deducted from their accounts.

“The trend of fraudulent activities including unwarranted deductions is becoming alarming and portrays the bank in bad light. Please help me appeal to them to release my bank statement to enable me verify my bank transaction details”, she pleaded.

Observers have expressed concern over several allegations of fraudulent practices being leveled against Sterling bank.
On 8th October, 2025, a group that called itself, Coalition of Civil Society Organizations Against Banks Fraudulent Practices and Customers Victimization, (CCSOABFFPCV), staged a peaceful protest at the Abuja headquarters of the Central Bank of Nigeria as well as in front of Sterling Bank, Abuja regional office.

At the apex bank’s office, the group submitted a petition, which was received by Mrs. Hakama Sidi Ali, the Acting Director, Corporate Communications, Central Bank of Nigeria.
The petition dated Monday 6th October, 2025, was addressed to Mr. Olayemi Cardoso, Governor, Central Bank of Nigeria, Abuja.
The protesters displayed placards with several inscriptions like; conspiracy;
forgery; criminal breach of trust; taking loan is not a crime; stop suffocating your customers; theft; make loan repayment transparent etc.

Comrade Flora Elekwa, Director, Mobilization and Advocacy of the CSO, told officials of the CBN and the Media that the trend of fraudulent activities occasioned by unwarranted deductions was becoming alarming and portrayed the Sterling bank in bad light.
The petition was signed by Comrade (Dr.) Sam Wisdom, National Coordinator; Comrade Flora Elekwa, Director, Mobilization and Advocacy; and Lady Cecilia Bisong, National Organizing Secretary.

“The street protest and advocacy match are aimed at drawing the attention of the government, regulatory authorities, and the general public to these unwholesome, illegal practices with a view to rectifying the situation” Mrs Elekwa said.

Particularly, the group faulted the manner Sterling Bank treats its customers and pleaded with the CBN as a supervisory government agency responsible for monitoring and supervision of all banks and financial institutions in Nigeria to immediately ask the management of Sterling bank to have a change of heart. The group specifically mentioned the case of Midden Systems Ltd, said to be a major customer of the bank but which allegedly lost over Two Hundred Million Dollars in its account to illegal deductions by officials of sterling bank.

Miden Systems Limited had in a petition to the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), the House of Representatives and the Inspector-General of Police (IGP) alleged that the bank through its Chief Executive Officer together with the Sterling bank’s Financial Holdings Company Plc and four others used its name to open various spurious accounts through which it allegedly syphoned the company’s funds domiciled with the bank up to the tune of over $200,000,000 (Two Hundred Million Dollars).

The Company, accused the bank of fraudulent accounting, mismanagement of contract proceeds, money laundering, unauthorized fund transfers, opening of fake bank accounts in the name of MIDEN Systems without authorization, and forgery of bank documents in clear violation of banking regulations.

“Funds were moved and misappropriated by the bank at reckless abandon with huge and massive spurious debits to the company’s account”, the company alleged in the petition.

The Company further stated that in line with standard bank practices and extant applicable laws, it continuously and consistently demanded for its statement of account which sterling bank refused to release.

Our Correspondent gathered that in June 2012, MIDEN Systems Ltd, an indigenous oil service firm, entered into a Term Loan/Vessel Finance Facility Agreement with Sterling Bank to enable Miden finance the acquisition of six Light Marine Vessels to be used in operation of the firm’s contract with SPDC.
Under the agreement, the Company contributed $7.3 million (30%) of vessel cost, while the Bank provided the sum of $17 Million dollars ($17,079,000.00) amounting to 70% as loan (via Letters of Credit) for the purchase of the vessels in Malaysia and Singapore. The Repayment plan was structured such that 70% of all contract proceeds from Shell Petroleum Development Company would be transferred, as Loan Repayment, to a Debt Servicing Repayment Accounts (“DSRA”) domiciled with Sterling Bank, while 30% would be reserved for the Company’s operational needs. The tenor of the loan was a 60 months duration (with 6 months moratorium) and billed to terminate by September 2017.

A Police Investigative Report of the activities of Sterling Bank dated 14 January 2025, (copy made available to us) uncovered series of grave banking malpractices committed by Sterling Bank between 2016 and 2024 with regards to the loan transaction.
According to the report, the bank has been misappropriating contract proceeds without rendering proper account statements to the customer. It said that several unauthorized payments were made from the customer account to unknown persons, including disclosed and undisclosed Sterling Bank customers.

“Despite multiple formal requests by the customer, Sterling bank refused to provide account statements thereby concealing transaction records (credit and debit notifications) and falsifying book entries.

“In addition, the bank failed to disclose the status of the loan liquidation process thereby creating financial opacity”, the Police report stated.

The police also said it discovered the creation of multiple fake accounts by the bank, including an unusual 20-digit account in the name of the company without authorization.

According to the report, “the Bank unlawfully consolidated the Customer Company’s account with the account of a different and distinct company, Chasewood Nigeria Limited, in order to fraudulently impose dubious and illegal debt obligations on the Company”.

It was found that Sterling Bank deliberately denied the Customer access to its 30% share of proceeds, thereby crippling the Company’s operations.
Between 2016 and 2024, Sterling Bank allegedly received more than $57 million in contract payments from SPDC and yet falsely claims the Company owes an additional $30 million Dollars to the Bank.

Further findings show that Sterling Bank received a total credit of One Hundred Million and Twenty-Two Thousand US dollars (USD122,768,041.69) in the domiciled account without rendering a proper account of the application and sources of funds to the customer contrary to CBN Rules & Regulations.

“The discoveries are shocking and sordid” An Insider source disclosed
The Police in the report said although Sterling Bank claimed that a $30 million loan was applied for, approved and disbursed in one day- 13th January 2017, the loan application did not emanate from the company. It accused the bank of forging the company’s lodgment of loan application and some documents relating to the loan including Account officer/branch review of loan application, credit committee approvals, customer’s board meeting/resolution. Etc.

“They purportedly fulfilled all terms and conditions for loan disbursement under one day and diverted the funds to private accounts operated by top officials of the bank”, the Police said.

Furthermore, the Police report indicates high level criminal conspiracy at the top management level of the bank to defraud the customer and conceal evidence. The bank unlawfully disbursed and failed to account for the sum of One Hundred and Twenty-Two Million dollars (USD122,768,041.69) admittedly credited to the Company’s account between 03/05/2016 and 19/07/2024.

The Bank also failed to apply the remittances in the sums of Fifty Seven Million US Dollars (USD57,301,865.56) and Six Billion, Nine Hundred and Seventy Million Naira (NGN6,972,548,982.39,) respectively, by SPDC between 2013 to 2020 towards reducing alleged debts but rather channeled the funds to unknown beneficiaries and accounts suspected to be operated by bank insiders and top officials.

According to the Police report, “ the bank falsified book entries on 13 January 2017 by pretending to credit the Company’s account with $30 Million US dollars when in fact there was no outstanding debt on the account.”

It sated that on 16th September 2017, the bank fraudulently transferred from the account the sum of USD28,302,140.59, under an unlawful scheme titled AA Loan Repayment – when there was no transaction linked to the account as well as other fraudulent transactions on 6th May 2016 and 27th August 2016.

Following the police findings, the matter was escalated to the House of Representatives Committee on Public Petitions, where the Nigeria Police Force submitted a report indicting Sterling Bank for alleged money laundering and mishandling of Miden Systems’ accounts.

To avoid further investigations and embarrassment by the Lawmakers, the Bank hurriedly approached the Federal High Court, sitting in Lagos, on 5th of February 2025, to seek a restraining order on the House of Representatives from further probe or investigation of Sterling Bank Limited and the Group Chief Executive Officer of Sterling Financial Holdings Company, Yemi Odubiyi pending the determination of the Motion on Notice.

At the resumed hearing of the case on April 30th 2025, the Court could not hear the matter but went on a prolonged adjournment raising concerns on the process.
Section 37(3) of the Cybercrimes (Prohibition and Prevention) Act 2015 explicitly criminalizes unauthorized debits by financial institutions.
Evidently, those familiar with the case said Sterling Bank’s actions, as outlined in the Police report, clearly violate this provision and Sections 18; 20, 24(1); 25 of the BOFIA, which prohibit fraudulent banking practices.

In separate interviews with our Correspondents, Legal experts and Consumer Advocacy group, Citizens Network for Consumer Rights, described the stunning revelations as a financial heist and called for the authorities to conduct a thorough and impartial investigation with a view to initiating possible criminal prosecution of those found culpable.

But the bank has consistently denied all fraudulent claims, describing both the publications and the protests at its branches as illegal attempts to disrupt its business operations.
With the above issue still pending, observers have wondered why the bank rather than amicably settle the matter, resorted to calling the Chief Executive of Miden Systems, Dr. Brenda Usoro unprintable names in a frantic bid to blackmail him before the public, a move one analyst described as “bank’s desperate bid to paint him in bad light”.

“Tell me, how can a man who brought million Dollar business to a bank but was robbed of his hard-earned money by the bank officials, be called by the same bank as a chronic debtor? That is laughable. I can only compare it to the proverbial case of the pot calling the kettle black”, said Chief James Ogene, a former Federal lawmaker and an Abuja based industrialist and estate developer.

“I have known Dr Usoro for the past 25 years and during this period we have done a number of businesses. He is trust worthy, honest, very reliable and sincere to a fault. If he tells you something, that is the way it is. Therefore, for someone to call him names in order to blackmail and tarnish his image, that person needs to examine himself or herself. I know the bank did that out of vengeance”, Chief Ogene added.

But the case of Miden Systems Limited is not the only albatross hanging on the neck of Sterling Bank and its officials. In August, 2025, lawyers representing one Olalekan Adejumo (not real name), a Lagos State resident, wrote to Sterling Bank, demanding an investigation and the immediate closure of a strange account the bank opened in their client’s name.

“My lawyers sent a letter to Sterling Bank yesterday, demanding an immediate closure of the strange account,” said Adejumo.

“You won’t believe that as we speak, the account is still very much active. It has not been closed by the bank.

“Despite all the efforts I personally made in getting Sterling Bank to close the account, it is still active.”

The lawyers also requested for a comprehensive report that would reveal the identity of the bank staff who were responsible for the opening of the account and how relevant account opening protocols and legal requirements, including the Know Your Customer (KYC) exercise, Bank Verification Number (BVN) validation and inclusion, and telephone number, and email address and National Identification Number (NIN) linkage, were bypassed before the account was opened.

Adejumo’s lawyers also demanded the unmasking of Legbeti Anuoluwapo, an individual who carried out a N5,000 transaction on the strange bank account, documents that were submitted for the account opening, an apology letter from Sterling Bank and confirmation that no loans, overdrafts and financial liabilities will be attached to the Lagos resident’s identity or BVN through the account.

Another allegation against the bank is delay in acting on customers’ requests.
One of such cases was that of a foreign-based Nigerian student who in 2022 almost lost her university admission with the threat of deportation after Sterling Bank delayed processing her tuition remittance. She was said to have initiated a Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) Form ‘A’ transaction through Sterling Bank on August 10, 2022, to pay her school fees abroad. Nearly three months passed without the bank remitting the funds or providing a positive update despite multiple emails. With a tight deadline on October 27, 2022, she faced potential expulsion and deportation due to the unfulfilled payment.

In a Twitter thread shared @DasilvaOlamide, she wrote: “I’m at the verge of losing my admission and getting a deportation because of Sterling Bank. I initiated my Form A since 10th August. I have sent them several emails showing them that my school requires the payment or I will be deported, my deadline is tomorrow. HELP!

“Sterling bank has still not done anything, please help me keep retweeting and tagging. Today is the deadline or I will be deported. It’s not fair that I have paid since August 10th and the money hasn’t been remitted to my school”, she wrote.
Source: https://twitter.com/DasilvaOlamide/status/1585234028852318209?s=20&t=a00_kcj9Vv59B0-05p1USQ

That is not all. In November, 2017, Grant Properties Ltd accused Sterling Bank of illegally selling its collateral for an N8 billion loan, but the bank denied any wrongdoing.

According to the property development company, Sterling Bank excised 10 hectares of its land valued at N5 billion, from a 50-hectare collateral and illegally sold it for pittance to a front company belonging to a senior director of the bank.

Delivering judgement on the matter, a Lagos high court ruled that the collateral was illegally sold and ordered the bank to return the property to the company.
The business deal started in 2002 when Grant Properties secured a 50-hectare land in Lekki, Lagos state, to build “Victory Park Estate”.

Sterling Bank was expected to transfer, alongside the loan, every part of the land to AMCON, but it was discovered that the bank left out 10 hectares which it sold to a Real Estate Development (RED) Company — said to be a front for a very senior director of the bank.

Olajide Awosedo, chairman of Grant Properties, said in a chat with journalists that a non-executive director of Sterling Bank had called him “face to face, brought out a survey of 10 hectares of my land and said, ‘Sir, sell this portion of land to me, if you want N10bn from my bank. I will make sure you get it. I am the chairman of real estate finance of the bank”. He refused.

“They moved my loan to AMCON, but rather than transfer all my collateral with the loan, the bank (Sterling) withheld the 10 hectares its director had his eyes on and sold it to him through a surrogate company owned by the director and his associates,” Awosedo added.

He alleged that the director initially sold the land to his front company at N18,500/sq metre, amounting to N1.85b for the 10 hectares — a far cry from the market worth of N5 billion, according to him.
About 2.4 hectares from the land was immediate

Continue Reading

News

Fresh Complaints Hit Sterling Bank Over Alleged Deductions, Service Delays

Published

on

By Reporter

Some customers of Sterling bank have cried out over what they described as “poor services, fraudulent deductions, harsh treatment, service delays, and misrepresentation of facts”, by officials of the bank.In the last few years, Sterling Bank, one of the Holding Companies (Holdco), has faced legal actions and police investigations over alleged unauthorized or fraudulent deductions, including notable cases brought by individual employees and corporate clients. In one instance, the Nigeria Police Force indicted the bank and several executives over alleged money laundering and fraudulent deductions totaling millions of dollars following petitions by corporate customers like Miden Systems Ltd. Plaintiffs alleged unauthorized loan bookings, forged signatures, and blocked accounts. Also, some of the workers have sued the bank at the High Court and National Industrial Court over ungranted or unsolicited salary loans that resulted in continuous, involuntary deductions from employee allowances and accounts. But, in these legal proceedings, Sterling Bank’s legal teams filed defense amendments, contest the validity of the claims, or assert compliance with internal loan processing and credit recovery protocols. Sterling Bank, prides itself as the “One-customer bank”. However, today, it is not only one customer but several of the bank’s customers complain about what they described as the bank’s “persistent deceit, illegal deductions from their accounts and misrepresentation of facts”, giving plethora of instances to back up their claims even as the bank has denied the allegations, stating that it did no wrong.Sterling Bank started in 1960 as an investment and merchant banking institution named Nigeria Acceptances Limited (NAL), which became Nigeria’s first merchant bank in 1969. It later changed its name to NAL Merchant Bank Plc and listed on the Nigerian Stock Exchange as public Limited liability company. In 2006, NAL Bank merged with four other financial institutions (Magnum Trust Bank, NBM Bank, Trust Bank of Africa, and Indo-Nigeria Merchant Bank) to form Sterling Bank. It also acquired Equatorial Trust Bank (ETB) to expand its national market share and branch network. Recent restructuring led to the establishment of a holding company structure named Sterling Financial Holdings Company (Sterling HoldCo).Speaking to our correspondent in Abuja at the weekend, a corporate account holder in the bank, Mrs. Obiageri Obiefule, stated that for a long time, customers have been at the mercy of the bank, which she claimed, on a regular basis debit them for all manner of reasons, some of which she said, were questionable and dubious including hidden charges.According to her, “these charges amount to loss of millions of Naira to us, the bank customers to the effect that sterling bank declare trillions yearly as profit at the detriment of its customers who lacked the voice to complain.“Even the regulatory agencies seem to be helpless in this situation as they have failed to address our several complaints”, she alleged.Another customer, Marvelous Okoro also accused the bank of refusing to release her bank statement four months after she applied for it. She alleged that she had been witnessing withdrawal alerts on her account and had applied to the bank for statement of account to verify the transactions, but expressed concern over the bank’s refusal wondering what could be the reason. She said her fear was based on complaints by two of her friends who she alleged had similar experiences with the bank yet to refund the money deducted from their accounts. “The trend of fraudulent activities including unwarranted deductions is becoming alarming and portrays the bank in bad light. Please help me appeal to them to release my bank statement to enable me verify my bank transaction details”, she pleaded.Observers have expressed concern over several allegations of fraudulent practices being leveled against Sterling bank. On 8th October, 2025, a group that called itself, Coalition of Civil Society Organizations Against Banks Fraudulent Practices and Customers Victimization, (CCSOABFFPCV), staged a peaceful protest at the Abuja headquarters of the Central Bank of Nigeria as well as in front of Sterling Bank, Abuja regional office.At the apex bank’s office, the group submitted a petition, which was received by Mrs. Hakama Sidi Ali, the Acting Director, Corporate Communications, Central Bank of Nigeria.The petition dated Monday 6th October, 2025, was addressed to Mr. Olayemi Cardoso, Governor, Central Bank of Nigeria, Abuja.The protesters displayed placards with several inscriptions like; conspiracy;forgery; criminal breach of trust; taking loan is not a crime; stop suffocating your customers; theft; make loan repayment transparent etc.Comrade Flora Elekwa, Director, Mobilization and Advocacy of the CSO, told officials of the CBN and the Media that the trend of fraudulent activities occasioned by unwarranted deductions was becoming alarming and portrayed the Sterling bank in bad light.The petition was signed by Comrade (Dr.) Sam Wisdom, National Coordinator; Comrade Flora Elekwa, Director, Mobilization and Advocacy; and Lady Cecilia Bisong, National Organizing Secretary.“The street protest and advocacy match are aimed at drawing the attention of the government, regulatory authorities, and the general public to these unwholesome, illegal practices with a view to rectifying the situation” Mrs Elekwa said.Particularly, the group faulted the manner Sterling Bank treats its customers and pleaded with the CBN as a supervisory government agency responsible for monitoring and supervision of all banks and financial institutions in Nigeria to immediately ask the management of Sterling bank to have a change of heart. The group specifically mentioned the case of Midden Systems Ltd, said to be a major customer of the bank but which allegedly lost over Two Hundred Million Dollars in its account to illegal deductions by officials of sterling bank.Miden Systems Limited had in a petition to the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), the House of Representatives and the Inspector-General of Police (IGP) alleged that the bank through its Chief Executive Officer together with the Sterling bank’s Financial Holdings Company Plc and four others used its name to open various spurious accounts through which it allegedly syphoned the company’s funds domiciled with the bank up to the tune of over $200,000,000 (Two Hundred Million Dollars).The Company, accused the bank of fraudulent accounting, mismanagement of contract proceeds, money laundering, unauthorized fund transfers, opening of fake bank accounts in the name of MIDEN Systems without authorization, and forgery of bank documents in clear violation of banking regulations.“Funds were moved and misappropriated by the bank at reckless abandon with huge and massive spurious debits to the company’s account”, the company alleged in the petition.The Company further stated that in line with standard bank practices and extant applicable laws, it continuously and consistently demanded for its statement of account which sterling bank refused to release.Our Correspondent gathered that in June 2012, MIDEN Systems Ltd, an indigenous oil service firm, entered into a Term Loan/Vessel Finance Facility Agreement with Sterling Bank to enable Miden finance the acquisition of six Light Marine Vessels to be used in operation of the firm’s contract with SPDC.Under the agreement, the Company contributed $7.3 million (30%) of vessel cost, while the Bank provided the sum of $17 Million dollars ($17,079,000.00) amounting to 70% as loan (via Letters of Credit) for the purchase of the vessels in Malaysia and Singapore. The Repayment plan was structured such that 70% of all contract proceeds from Shell Petroleum Development Company would be transferred, as Loan Repayment, to a Debt Servicing Repayment Accounts (“DSRA”) domiciled with Sterling Bank, while 30% would be reserved for the Company’s operational needs. The tenor of the loan was a 60 months duration (with 6 months moratorium) and billed to terminate by September 2017.A Police Investigative Report of the activities of Sterling Bank dated 14 January 2025, (copy made available to us) uncovered series of grave banking malpractices committed by Sterling Bank between 2016 and 2024 with regards to the loan transaction.According to the report, the bank has been misappropriating contract proceeds without rendering proper account statements to the customer. It said that several unauthorized payments were made from the customer account to unknown persons, including disclosed and undisclosed Sterling Bank customers.“Despite multiple formal requests by the customer, Sterling bank refused to provide account statements thereby concealing transaction records (credit and debit notifications) and falsifying book entries.“In addition, the bank failed to disclose the status of the loan liquidation process thereby creating financial opacity”, the Police report stated.The police also said it discovered the creation of multiple fake accounts by the bank, including an unusual 20-digit account in the name of the company without authorization.According to the report, “the Bank unlawfully consolidated the Customer Company’s account with the account of a different and distinct company, Chasewood Nigeria Limited, in order to fraudulently impose dubious and illegal debt obligations on the Company”.It was found that Sterling Bank deliberately denied the Customer access to its 30% share of proceeds, thereby crippling the Company’s operations.Between 2016 and 2024, Sterling Bank allegedly received more than $57 million in contract payments from SPDC and yet falsely claims the Company owes an additional $30 million Dollars to the Bank.Further findings show that Sterling Bank received a total credit of One Hundred Million and Twenty-Two Thousand US dollars (USD122,768,041.69) in the domiciled account without rendering a proper account of the application and sources of funds to the customer contrary to CBN Rules & Regulations.”The discoveries are shocking and sordid” An Insider source disclosedThe Police in the report said although Sterling Bank claimed that a $30 million loan was applied for, approved and disbursed in one day- 13th January 2017, the loan application did not emanate from the company. It accused the bank of forging the company’s lodgment of loan application and some documents relating to the loan including Account officer/branch review of loan application, credit committee approvals, customer’s board meeting/resolution. Etc.“They purportedly fulfilled all terms and conditions for loan disbursement under one day and diverted the funds to private accounts operated by top officials of the bank”, the Police said.Furthermore, the Police report indicates high level criminal conspiracy at the top management level of the bank to defraud the customer and conceal evidence. The bank unlawfully disbursed and failed to account for the sum of One Hundred and Twenty-Two Million dollars (USD122,768,041.69) admittedly credited to the Company’s account between 03/05/2016 and 19/07/2024.The Bank also failed to apply the remittances in the sums of Fifty Seven Million US Dollars (USD57,301,865.56) and Six Billion, Nine Hundred and Seventy Million Naira (NGN6,972,548,982.39,) respectively, by SPDC between 2013 to 2020 towards reducing alleged debts but rather channeled the funds to unknown beneficiaries and accounts suspected to be operated by bank insiders and top officials.According to the Police report, “ the bank falsified book entries on 13 January 2017 by pretending to credit the Company’s account with $30 Million US dollars when in fact there was no outstanding debt on the account.”It sated that on 16th September 2017, the bank fraudulently transferred from the account the sum of USD28,302,140.59, under an unlawful scheme titled AA Loan Repayment – when there was no transaction linked to the account as well as other fraudulent transactions on 6th May 2016 and 27th August 2016.Following the police findings, the matter was escalated to the House of Representatives Committee on Public Petitions, where the Nigeria Police Force submitted a report indicting Sterling Bank for alleged money laundering and mishandling of Miden Systems’ accounts.To avoid further investigations and embarrassment by the Lawmakers, the Bank hurriedly approached the Federal High Court, sitting in Lagos, on 5th of February 2025, to seek a restraining order on the House of Representatives from further probe or investigation of Sterling Bank Limited and the Group Chief Executive Officer of Sterling Financial Holdings Company, Yemi Odubiyi pending the determination of the Motion on Notice.At the resumed hearing of the case on April 30th 2025, the Court could not hear the matter but went on a prolonged adjournment raising concerns on the process.Section 37(3) of the Cybercrimes (Prohibition and Prevention) Act 2015 explicitly criminalizes unauthorized debits by financial institutions.Evidently, those familiar with the case said Sterling Bank’s actions, as outlined in the Police report, clearly violate this provision and Sections 18; 20, 24(1); 25 of the BOFIA, which prohibit fraudulent banking practices.In separate interviews with our Correspondents, Legal experts and Consumer Advocacy group, Citizens Network for Consumer Rights, described the stunning revelations as a financial heist and called for the authorities to conduct a thorough and impartial investigation with a view to initiating possible criminal prosecution of those found culpable.But the bank has consistently denied all fraudulent claims, describing both the publications and the protests at its branches as illegal attempts to disrupt its business operations. With the above issue still pending, observers have wondered why the bank rather than amicably settle the matter, resorted to calling the Chief Executive of Miden Systems, Dr. Brenda Usoro unprintable names in a frantic bid to blackmail him before the public, a move one analyst described as “bank’s desperate bid to paint him in bad light”.“Tell me, how can a man who brought million Dollar business to a bank but was robbed of his hard-earned money by the bank officials, be called by the same bank as a chronic debtor? That is laughable. I can only compare it to the proverbial case of the pot calling the kettle black”, said Chief James Ogene, a former Federal lawmaker and an Abuja based industrialist and estate developer.“I have known Dr Usoro for the past 25 years and during this period we have done a number of businesses. He is trust worthy, honest, very reliable and sincere to a fault. If he tells you something, that is the way it is. Therefore, for someone to call him names in order to blackmail and tarnish his image, that person needs to examine himself or herself. I know the bank did that out of vengeance”, Chief Ogene added.But the case of Miden Systems Limited is not the only albatross hanging on the neck of Sterling Bank and its officials. In August, 2025, lawyers representing one Olalekan Adejumo (not real name), a Lagos State resident, wrote to Sterling Bank, demanding an investigation and the immediate closure of a strange account the bank opened in their client’s name.“My lawyers sent a letter to Sterling Bank yesterday, demanding an immediate closure of the strange account,” said Adejumo.“You won’t believe that as we speak, the account is still very much active. It has not been closed by the bank.“Despite all the efforts I personally made in getting Sterling Bank to close the account, it is still active.”The lawyers also requested for a comprehensive report that would reveal the identity of the bank staff who were responsible for the opening of the account and how relevant account opening protocols and legal requirements, including the Know Your Customer (KYC) exercise, Bank Verification Number (BVN) validation and inclusion, and telephone number, and email address and National Identification Number (NIN) linkage, were bypassed before the account was opened.Adejumo’s lawyers also demanded the unmasking of Legbeti Anuoluwapo, an individual who carried out a N5,000 transaction on the strange bank account, documents that were submitted for the account opening, an apology letter from Sterling Bank and confirmation that no loans, overdrafts and financial liabilities will be attached to the Lagos resident’s identity or BVN through the account.Another allegation against the bank is delay in acting on customers’ requests.One of such cases was that of a foreign-based Nigerian student who in 2022 almost lost her university admission with the threat of deportation after Sterling Bank delayed processing her tuition remittance. She was said to have initiated a Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) Form ‘A’ transaction through Sterling Bank on August 10, 2022, to pay her school fees abroad. Nearly three months passed without the bank remitting the funds or providing a positive update despite multiple emails. With a tight deadline on October 27, 2022, she faced potential expulsion and deportation due to the unfulfilled payment. In a Twitter thread shared @DasilvaOlamide, she wrote: “I’m at the verge of losing my admission and getting a deportation because of Sterling Bank. I initiated my Form A since 10th August. I have sent them several emails showing them that my school requires the payment or I will be deported, my deadline is tomorrow. HELP!“Sterling bank has still not done anything, please help me keep retweeting and tagging. Today is the deadline or I will be deported. It’s not fair that I have paid since August 10th and the money hasn’t been remitted to my school”, she wrote.Source: https://twitter.com/DasilvaOlamide/status/1585234028852318209?s=20&t=a00_kcj9Vv59B0-05p1USQThat is not all. In November, 2017, Grant Properties Ltd accused Sterling Bank of illegally selling its collateral for an N8 billion loan, but the bank denied any wrongdoing.According to the property development company, Sterling Bank excised 10 hectares of its land valued at N5 billion, from a 50-hectare collateral and illegally sold it for pittance to a front company belonging to a senior director of the bank.Delivering judgement on the matter, a Lagos high court ruled that the collateral was illegally sold and ordered the bank to return the property to the company.The business deal started in 2002 when Grant Properties secured a 50-hectare land in Lekki, Lagos state, to build “Victory Park Estate”.Sterling Bank was expected to transfer, alongside the loan, every part of the land to AMCON, but it was discovered that the bank left out 10 hectares which it sold to a Real Estate Development (RED) Company — said to be a front for a very senior director of the bank.Olajide Awosedo, chairman of Grant Properties, said in a chat with journalists that a non-executive director of Sterling Bank had called him “face to face, brought out a survey of 10 hectares of my land and said, ‘Sir, sell this portion of land to me, if you want N10bn from my bank. I will make sure you get it. I am the chairman of real estate finance of the bank”. He refused.“They moved my loan to AMCON, but rather than transfer all my collateral with the loan, the bank (Sterling) withheld the 10 hectares its director had his eyes on and sold it to him through a surrogate company owned by the director and his associates,” Awosedo added.He alleged that the director initially sold the land to his front company at N18,500/sq metre, amounting to N1.85b for the 10 hectares — a far cry from the market worth of N5 billion, according to him.About 2.4 hectares from the land was immediate

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2017 Zox News Theme. Theme by MVP Themes, powered by WordPress.