News
Reuters Triple Misadventures in Nigeria
By Karen Goulding
Nothing happens in a vacuum. There must be an underlining objective. This much I learnt over time, hence my concern with the recent barrage from the French news platform Reuters. Nigeria is in their interest for inexplicable reasons.
The focus is the Nigerian Military in the prosecution of the war against terrorism in North East Nigeria. There is no other sector in Nigeria that interests Reuters. And the reason is not far-fetched. The Nigerian Military has recorded tangible gains in North East Nigeria, which has affected the French interest in the destabilization plot against Nigeria.
Some have argued that there is more than meets the eye. Some have also argued that, like other organizations against the interest of Nigeria, the French interest revolves mainly around economic interest. I say this for a reason.
North East Nigeria borders the francophone countries where France rules by proxy. The economic potential of North East Nigeria has continued to interest France. It is primarily responsible for the drive to ensure that the region stays destabilized so it can continue to exploit the enormous economic resources, especially in the Lake Chad basin region.
This recent drive by Reuters is by every stretch of imagination suspect. Reuters released three damming reports against the Nigerian Military in less than two weeks. While it is okay for a news platform to carry out investigative journalism, it is wrong when such reports are half-truths and illogical conclusions.
As mentioned earlier, there is a history. The attack by Reuters against the Nigerian Army dates back to when the Boko Haram crisis was at its peak. It was common knowledge then that whenever the Nigerian Military was making gains, Reuters was in the habit of churning out reports that would destabilize the troops and allow the Boko Haram terrorists to regroup and launch attacks against the Military.
This has been their stock in trade; therefore, the recent triple attack against the Nigerian Military didn’t come as a surprise. Aside from the fact that the reports lacked objectivity, they showed a strong disdain for Nigeria.
The report on forced abortion in North East Nigeria is, at best, a miscarriage in journalism. It was a highly defective enterprise that exposed the shallowness of the promoters of Reuters. It read like a low-budget movie. That is what it is.
The second report was more of a caricature of what news reportage represents. It promoted innuendos rather than facts. It granted a flashy headline but was empty in content. It was a rehash of previous failed reports that failed. It was, at best, a story meant for kindergarten.
The third report on massacred children is not a topic for conversation. It remains one of the most illogical articles from a supposed international news agency. I am at a loss how such a story was sanctioned for release, and Reuters promoted it like an award-winning story. It was a poor plot that was laced with mischief and malice. It reinforces the hatred the promoters of Reuters have against Nigeria.
I am tempted to assume that this drive is not any different from previous failed attempts to dampen the morale of the Nigerian Military in the prosecution of the war against Boko Haram terrorism. The pertinent question is, why now?
Why did Reuters elect to release three reports consecutively against the Nigerian Military? What is it that they know that we do not know? Maybe Reuters is aware that the Boko Haram conflict in North East Nigeria is ending, which might spell doom for the French interest in its economic postulations in Nigeria.
It is time to call Reuters to order on its reportage on Nigeria. This is important to spare Nigerians the fallacies on the operations of the Nigerian Military in North East Nigeria. The promoters of the news platform must retrace its steps and give peace a chance in Nigeria. This is on the heels that its numerous attempts at unsetting the polity have failed to gain traction.
The Boko Haram conundrum is gradually ending, and no amount of negative propaganda can bring it back to life. The efforts of the Nigerian Military in addressing the Boko Haram challenge have been noteworthy and received commendations from near and far.
I would be pleasantly surprised if Nigerians take Reuters seriously. The news medium has lost credibility; it has been identified as acting against the journalism creed. And they reinforced it with this new drive to cause disintegration in the country.
In case they do not know, there is a limit to mischief. There is also a limit to the public dance of shame. Some of us are aware of the interests and strategy. Unfortunately, according to the idiom, “those whom the gods want to destroy they first make mad”. This is the case of Reuters, and it is a pity that they can’t see the handwriting on the wall.
They keep churning fallacies to their unsuspecting readership. There is nothing worse than the Reuters misinformation on Nigeria. Their credibility is on the fringes of extinction. Reuters must leave Nigeria alone. We are a strong and united country. We are not francophone and a former colony. We are Nigeria! They should learn from the Amnesty International example. A word is enough for the wise.
Goulding writes this piece from the United Kingdom.
News
2027: Stay Off Imo State, Lawyers Warn Wike
Imo Lawyers for the Defence of Democracy have called on the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Nyesom Wike, to stop what it termed public attacks on Imo State Governor, Senator Hope Uzodinma, saying political disagreements should be resolved through democratic dialogue and constitutional means.The group made the call in a statement signed by its Secretary, Ifeoma Chukwunyere on Friday, September 18, 2026, amid what it described as increasingly personal exchanges between Wike and Uzodinma over political developments within the All Progressives Congress.The lawyers said the APC Governors’ Forum had rejected what they described as Wike’s “Rainbow Coalition” political arrangement, arguing that the disagreement should be addressed with the forum rather than through personal attacks on Uzodinma.According to the group, the forum’s position was based on concerns that the political arrangement could weaken the APC or create divided loyalty within the party.“We recognise the constitutional right of every Nigerian, including public officials and political actors, to express political opinions, criticise policies and participate in political activities,” the group said.“However, that freedom must not become a licence for personal attacks, intimidation or unnecessary escalation.”The lawyers said Uzodinma, as the governor of Imo State, should be allowed to discharge his responsibilities without political exchanges creating tension capable of affecting the peace and stability of the state.They urged Wike to desist from further public comments concerning the governor, insisting that political disagreements should focus on policies, programmes, political positions and verifiable facts rather than personal exchanges.The group also warned political actors against turning Imo State into a battleground for political supremacy.“Imo State is not a battlefield for political supremacy. Its people have the constitutional right to choose their leaders and determine their political future without undue interference, intimidation or external pressure,” it said.The lawyers further called on political parties, leaders, supporters and media platforms to avoid inflammatory language that could provoke confrontation.They urged Uzodinma to continue to operate within the Constitution and the laws of the country, while allowing relevant political and legal institutions to handle legitimate disagreements.The group also appealed to President Bola Tinubu to encourage restraint among political actors, particularly in relation to the dispute between Wike and Uzodinma.Addressing Wike directly, the lawyers said: “Mr. Minister, Imo State belongs to its people. You are not from Imo, so stay off Imo.”They stressed that disagreements over political strategies, elections, alliances and political actors in the state should be settled through democratic debate and constitutional processes.The group said it would continue to monitor developments affecting constitutional governance, democratic participation, political freedom and peace in Imo State.“Our position is simple: Democracy must prevail. The Constitution must prevail. The rule of law must prevail,” the statement added.
News
OLUYEDE: WHEN A GOOD MAN LEADS THE ARMED FORCES
By Sunday Johnson
“The true test of a man’s character is what he does when no one is watching.” This observation, widely attributed to American basketball coach, John Wooden, captures something important about leadership; that the character of a leader is often revealed not by the speech he makes, but by the things he chooses to do when applause is absent.
In General Olufemi Olatubosun Oluyede, Nigeria appears to have a military leader whose understanding of service goes beyond rank, uniform and command. Since assuming office as Chief of Defence Staff, he has continued to demonstrate that leadership in the Armed Forces is ultimately about responsibility, sacrifice and the welfare of the men and women entrusted with defending the nation.
Oluyede’s journey to the highest professional position in Nigeria’s military establishment did not happen overnight. Born in Ikere, Ekiti State, in 1968, he joined the Nigerian Defence Academy in 1987 and was commissioned into the Nigerian Army in 1992. His career took him through some of the country’s most demanding theatres, including Liberia, Bakassi and the North-East, where he commanded troops under Operation HADIN KAI. Before becoming CDS, he served as Chief of Army Staff, bringing with him decades of operational and command experience.
Perhaps the clearest window into the man Oluyede is, can be found in an interview he granted as Army Chief in 2025. Asked about the security situation across the theatres of operation, he did not pretend that the country had overcome all its difficulties. Instead, he acknowledged the challenges while pointing to measurable progress, observing that, despite the threats that remained, “by and large, things are getting better.” That mixture of realism and confidence says something about his approach. He does not need to exaggerate success to demonstrate leadership, nor does he deny the difficulties confronting the Armed Forces.
For Oluyede, a soldier is not merely another instrument of war, he is a human being who must be trained, fed, housed and properly prepared for the dangers of the battlefield. That philosophy was evident when he disclosed that the Army had increased the daily ration cash allowance for troops from N1,500 to N3,000. He also spoke about affordable housing and other welfare initiatives designed to help personnel secure homes before retirement. These are not glamorous aspects of military command, but they matter greatly to the morale of a force whose personnel routinely place their lives between danger and the civilian population.
What makes the welfare question even more significant is Oluyede’s understanding that taking care of soldiers does not end with putting food on their tables. In that same interview, he described training as the “best form of welfare” for a soldier because an inadequately trained soldier is vulnerable both to the enemy and to the demands of modern warfare. His efforts to expand and improve training capacity, including plans to reduce pressure on the Zaria training depot, reflected an attempt to build a force that is not simply larger in numbers but better prepared for the responsibilities placed upon it.
His concern for the troops has also been matched by an appreciation of what the future battlefield looks like. Oluyede has consistently spoken about technology, intelligence, innovation and the need to anticipate emerging threats rather than merely react to them. As CDS, he has placed considerable emphasis on intelligence driven operations and stronger cooperation among the Army, Navy, Air Force and other security agencies. At his assumption of office, he made clear that Nigeria’s evolving threats demanded greater vigilance, innovation and unity across the security architecture.
That emphasis on joint operations is particularly important at a time when Nigeria’s security challenges cut across traditional boundaries. Terrorism, banditry, kidnapping, oil theft, maritime threats and other criminal activities cannot be effectively confronted by one service working in isolation. The early operational record under Oluyede’s tenure has provided evidence of the importance of this approach. Defence Headquarters figures for May 2026 showed that troops across the country neutralised 317 terrorists and other criminal elements, arrested 314 suspects and rescued 221 kidnapped or vulnerable civilians, while recovering 93 assorted arms.
But numbers alone do not explain Oluyede’s appeal as a commander. There is also something deliberately human in the way he speaks about the people under his command. In his earlier interview, he repeatedly returned to the question of morale, stressing that his concern was to ensure that soldiers were “well-trained and well-catered for.” He discussed special allowances, affordable housing and zero-interest loan arrangements, showing that he understands that a soldier’s commitment to duty is strengthened when the institution demonstrates that it values his sacrifice.
There is, too, a broader philosophy behind his leadership. Oluyede has argued that security is everybody’s business and that the military cannot defeat violent extremism without the cooperation of communities, intelligence agencies, the police, international partners and ordinary citizens. His comments about intelligence gathering in the North-East showed an understanding that contemporary insurgency is not fought solely with guns; it is also a contest for information, community trust and freedom of action. That recognition has encouraged a more integrated approach to national security, one that sees the Armed Forces as part of a wider national effort rather than an institution operating by itself.
His vision also extends beyond the immediate battlefields to the question of Nigeria’s strategic independence. Oluyede has advocated greater local production of military equipment, arguing that a country facing its own security problems cannot indefinitely depend on imported solutions. During his Senate screening, he identified the development of Nigeria’s military-industrial capacity as one of the priorities of his tenure and called for greater investment in indigenous defence production.
It is therefore easy to understand why the description of Oluyede as a “good man” resonates beyond the ordinary language of military commendation. Goodness in public service is not softness, nor is it the absence of firmness. It is the ability to exercise authority without losing sight of the human beings affected by that authority.
Oluyede has shown the firmness expected of a commander while repeatedly drawing attention to the welfare, training and dignity of the personnel who carry out the Armed Forces’ most dangerous assignments. His record as CDS is still being written, but the emphasis on professionalism, jointness, innovation, accountability and troop welfare has already become a recognisable feature of his leadership.
Ultimately, the worth of a military leader is measured not only by the orders issued from headquarters but by the confidence those orders inspire in the men and women who execute them. General Olufemi Oluyede came to the Defence Headquarters with decades of experience behind him and an enormous national responsibility ahead of him. His challenge is formidable, and the country’s security problems remain real.
Yet his conduct so far offers a compelling reminder that when a good man leads, authority can be accompanied by empathy, discipline by compassion, and military strength by a genuine concern for those who bear its weight. That is the kind of leadership Nigeria’s Armed Forces deserve, and the kind of standard by which Oluyede’s tenure will ultimately be remembered.
News
Hon. Jafaaru Yakubu Demands Urgent Action on Taraba Road Collapse
Hon. Jafaaru Yakubu, Chairman of the House Committee on Nigeria-China Friendship, has issued a strong call for immediate government intervention following the collapse of the Bali-Suntai Road in Taraba State. His appeal comes two years after the Namnai Bridge in Gassol Local Government Area collapsed, a tragedy that remains unresolved and continues to haunt residents. Yakubu stressed that the latest disaster is not just an infrastructure failure but a humanitarian crisis that threatens livelihoods, education, and commerce across the region.The Bali-Suntai Road, particularly around the Zagah axis in Bali LGA, was washed away after heavy rains, leaving more than 300 vehicles stranded. Among them were heavy-duty trucks loaded with goods, buses carrying passengers, and smaller vehicles attempting to navigate the route. The collapse has paralyzed transport services, cutting off communities and disrupting trade. For traders, the losses are mounting daily as perishable goods rot in transit, while transport operators face financial ruin from halted operations. Ordinary citizens, meanwhile, are left stranded, unable to access markets, schools, or health facilities.In reinforcing Yakubu’s appeal, Alh. Abdulhamid Kungana, Director General of Campaign for Hon. Jafaaru Yakubu’s 2027 House of Representatives bid, underscored the urgency of the crisis, describing it as a ticking time bomb for Taraba’s economy and social fabric. He noted that the collapse has left communities isolated and vulnerable, with economic activities grinding to a halt. His intervention added political weight to Yakubu’s voice, framing the issue not only as a matter of infrastructure but as a test of governance and leadership. By aligning with Yakubu’s call, Kungana’s campaign leadership amplified the demand for swift and decisive action, signaling that the plight of Taraba’s people must be treated as a national priority.Yakubu emphasized that infrastructure is the backbone of economic and social life, and without functioning roads and bridges, communities are isolated, commerce grinds to a halt, and education suffers. His call is not just a political statement but a demand for urgent action that directly affects thousands of Nigerians. Residents have pleaded for swift repairs, warning that the situation will worsen as the rainy season continues. Traders fear that the collapse will lead to skyrocketing prices of goods and services, as supply chains remain disrupted. The prolonged neglect of the Namnai Bridge and now the Bali-Suntai Road highlights the urgent need for sustainable road maintenance policies in Taraba State.The combined voices of Yakubu and Kungana have transformed the crisis into a rallying point for accountability. Their united stance reflects a broader demand for government responsiveness, reminding leaders that infrastructure failures are not abstract statistics but lived realities for communities. The collapse of two critical transport routes within two years has left Taraba’s people in despair, and unless urgent steps are taken, the crisis will deepen, leaving the state further isolated and economically strangled.
-
Uncategorized6 years agoFG, states urged to harness flooding for ranching, others with technology – Agbaje
-
Headlines11 years agoBreaking: EFCC seals Borno House of Assembly, as Hon members take to their heels
-
News12 years agoNigeria Security Operatives Stage Manhunt For Homosexual Perpetrator
-
News10 years agoHow 21-year-old Girl fled community over accusation of lesbianism
-
News11 years agoYobe Gov Moves Against Deputy
-
Opinion7 years ago7 signs she has friend zoned you
-
Technology5 years ago
Online job placement company headhunts women
-
Headlines10 years agoBorno Dep Gov Abducts Another Church Leader
