News
U.S. double standards in Ukraine crisis testify to sole purpose of global domination
President Joe Biden speaks at Tidewater Community College, Monday, May 3, 2021, in Portsmouth, Va. Biden and the first lady are in coastal Virginia to promote his plans to increase spending on education and children, part of his $1.8 trillion families proposal announced last week. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)
A month into the Russia-Ukraine conflict, picturing an endgame is challenging, with the White House poised to heap more pressure on the Kremlin while ignoring Moscow’s demands for security.
During the crisis, the United States, guided by its self-interests, has added fuel to the fire by delivering lethal weapons to Ukraine and imposing unprecedented sanctions on Russia.
All U.S. moves run counter to global efforts to de-escalate the conflict and won’t inspire an urgently needed ceasefire. Instead, Washington’s actions aim to shore up its global domination, and other countries are paying the price.
“STRATEGIC MISTAKE”
Before the fighting broke out, the United States had intentionally hyped up tensions between Russia and Ukraine instead of pooling efforts to smooth things over. With the situation worsening, the country is wielding its political heft and flexing its economic muscles to corner Russia, many experts have said.
For the United States, “the relative ease of imposing economic sanctions has made them the foreign-policy option of first resort, despite a growing body of evidence that they often fail to achieve their goals,” Fortune magazine wrote on Feb. 24, when Russia launched the special military operation.
“In some cases, experience has shown that sanctions only entrench undesirable behavior from the parties they target,” it added.
“The tool of sanctions has become a tired tool,” Stephen Biegun, former U.S. deputy secretary of state under ex-president Donald Trump, was quoted in the report as saying.
The use of sanctions, Biegun added, “has not seemed to significantly alter the behavior of any foreign party whose actions are of concern to the United States.”
Michael O’Hanlon, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, said in an interview with Xinhua on Wednesday that the continuous expansion of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) has reached an “extreme” point and that the Russian reaction of launching its military operation “was predictable.”
“In that sense, we made a strategic mistake,” he said.
To further isolate Moscow, the United States has proposed excluding Russia from the Group of 20, attempting to blur the line between global economic cooperation and political security.
The U.S.-led response to Russia laid bare double standards and was “hysterical,” which even includes sanctions on cats and dogs, Jin Canrong, professor at the School of International Studies of Renmin University of China, told Xinhua on Thursday.
U.S. DOUBLE STANDARDS
The double standards employed by Washington on Ukraine have once again revealed the essence of its foreign policy — which put America’s interests first — despite politically-glorified slogans of defending peace, democracy, human rights and freedom.
While chanting freedom of speech, the United States forced Russia’s English news channel RT America to cease production earlier this month as part of its whole-of-the-system information campaign to mute Russia. Furthermore, several U.S. social media platforms have rushed to close accounts and delete content seen as pro-Moscow.
“They’re afraid of even a single voice coming out as challenging the power elite, questioning them, daring to hold a dissenting view,” former Democratic Representative Tulsi Gabbard said recently. “And they’re afraid because their arguments are so weak that they know they will not withstand the light of the truth.”
Ted Galen Carpenter, a senior fellow for defense and foreign policy studies at the Cato Institute, a think tank headquartered in Washington, D.C., concluded as early as 2018 that the United States has had “too many foreign policy double standards.” However, its leaders like to portray the nation “as an exemplar of ethical conduct in the international system.”
“Such blatant hypocrisy and double standards continue today,” Carpenter said. “U.S. leaders need to be candid with the American people and acknowledge that their decisions are based on cold calculations of national interest, not ethical considerations.”
Double standards were boldly on display when the U.S. urged European countries to absorb people fleeing Ukraine while indifferent to refugees from certain war-torn places in the Middle East and parts of Asia, whose suffering has stemmed mainly from years-long, hegemony-sustaining military operations led by the United States.
Residents of Kabul, the capital of Afghanistan, took to the streets in mid-February to condemn the White House for its decision to free up 3.5 billion U.S. dollars in Afghan assets held in the United States for families of 9/11 victims and urged America to provide financial compensation for the tens of thousands of Afghans killed during 20 years of war in the landlocked nation.
“Money stolen from Afghans, an economy destroyed,” tweeted Sana Saeed, a host and senior producer of AJ+, a social media publisher owned by Al Jazeera Media Network. “The depravity of this current crisis could have been avoided but instead the U.S. chose to starve an entire people.”
Since the end of the Cold War, the United States has waged numerous wars under the guise of “human rights over sovereignty,” putting hegemonism above the international order and domestic law above international law, Jin said.
DANGERS OF U.S. SELF-ABSORPTION
With a fixation on political coercing and economic bullying, Washington has tried to shore up its leadership while letting European countries foot the bill for soaring energy prices, rising military expenses and the heavy burden of absorbing a massive influx of refugees.
The United States is the “remote controller” of the current Russia-Ukraine crisis while Ukraine has become the “cannon fodder,” Chen Fengying, a researcher with the China Institutes of Contemporary International Relations, said in a recent interview with Xinhua.
Chen said “the sanctions imposed by the United States on Russia are limitless and unprecedented,” adding that the current international order has been “disrupted,” which might make more countries take an interests-first stance.
William Jones, Washington bureau chief of the U.S. publication Executive Intelligence Review, told Xinhua in a recent interview that Russia’s main concern about NATO eastward expansion has never been heeded by the United States, “which is only interested in maintaining its hegemonic status in Europe, and which has been steadily retreating from that collaborative policy which the West committed itself to after the Cold War.”
A major exporter of some of the world’s most essential commodities as Russia is, massive U.S. economic sanctions would undoubtedly shock the trade in commodities, disrupt global supply chains and thus weigh heavily on the fragile post-pandemic recovery of the global economy.
Ira Kalish, the chief global economist at Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, said the sanctions “create a risk that trade in commodities could become disrupted, especially exports of oil and gas commodities to Europe.”
“This risk is manifested in a sizable increase in the prices of key commodities, potentially leading to even higher global inflation and weaker global growth,” said Kalish.
News
Hon. Dattuwa Congratulates Kabiru Masari on Appointment as Tinubu’s Special Adviser
The appointment of Alhaji Ibrahim Kabiru Masari as Special Adviser on Political Affairs to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has been widely applauded, with party leaders and stakeholders describing it as a strategic move to strengthen the All Progressives Congress (APC) and advance Nigeria’s democratic governance.
In a congratulatory message, Hon. Dattuwa Ali Kumo, Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the Industrial Training Fund (ITF) and Deputy National Financial Secretary of the APC, commended Masari’s elevation, calling it “a well-deserved recognition of his loyalty, competence, and political acumen.”
Hon. Dattuwa emphasized that Masari’s appointment comes at a critical time when the APC must consolidate its leadership and foster unity across diverse political interests. He noted that Masari’s vast experience and inclusive approach will not only strengthen the party’s internal cohesion but also provide President Tinubu with valuable counsel in shaping policies that promote national growth and stability.
“Alhaji Kabiru Masari has consistently demonstrated resilience and a deep commitment to progressive governance. His new role will serve as a vital link between government and party structures, ensuring that the APC remains responsive to the aspirations of Nigerians while guiding the President toward decisions that will strengthen both the party and the country at large,” Hon. Dattuwa stated.
Political analysts have observed that Masari’s appointment underscores President Tinubu’s determination to surround himself with trusted allies who possess both political depth and organizational skill. They argue that Masari’s advisory role will enhance the administration’s political strategies, reinforce the APC’s grassroots presence, and contribute to the overall growth of Nigeria’s democracy.
Stakeholders across the APC have expressed optimism that Masari’s new position will play a significant role in shaping the party’s future direction and ensuring the success of President Tinubu’s government. For many, his appointment is seen not only as a recognition of his personal qualities but also as a step toward building a more inclusive and responsive political structure that aligns with the aspirations of Nigerians.
News
Dogara Hails Obasanjo at 89: A Towering Statesman of Enduring Legacy
At 89, Chief Olusegun Obasanjo stands as one of Africa’s most enduring statesmen, a leader whose life has been defined by sacrifice, resilience, and service. His birthday is not just a celebration of longevity, but a reflection on a legacy that continues to shape Nigeria and the continent.
Former Speaker of the House of Representatives, Rt. Hon. Yakubu Dogara, paid glowing tribute to the former president, describing him as “a statesman of uncommon stature” whose contributions to Nigeria’s unity, democratic consolidation, and economic reforms remain unmatched.
Dogara noted that Obasanjo’s leadership journey — from military command to civilian presidency — reflects courage and vision that left indelible marks on Nigeria’s political and economic landscape. He praised Obasanjo’s role in strengthening democratic institutions, spearheading anti-corruption initiatives, and amplifying Nigeria’s voice in global affairs.
Beyond Nigeria, Dogara highlighted Obasanjo’s interventions in African peace processes, stressing that his mediation efforts earned him respect as a continental leader and global diplomat. He further described Obasanjo as a mentor and conscience of the nation, whose courage to speak truth to power and insistence on justice and equity have made him a moral compass for leaders and citizens alike.
Concluding his tribute, Dogara offered prayers for Obasanjo’s continued health and wisdom: “At 89, Baba Obasanjo stands as a living testimony of God’s grace and favor. May his legacy forever shine as a beacon of hope for Nigeria and Africa.”
News
Right Group Demands Expedited Actions on Pipeline Surveillance Contract Probe
A Coalition of civil society organizations on Transparency and Accountability in partnership with the Empowerment for Unemployed Youth Initiative (EUYI) has urged the Nigerian Senate to stand firm in the pipeline surveillance contract probe, even as they called on President Bola Ahmed Tinubu take appropriate actions at the end of the probe to pacify angry Nigerians who are tired of excuses.
In a press text signed by Igwe Ude-Umanta and Prince Danesi Momoh Prince; Convener and National Coordinator of EUYI respectively, copies of which were distributed to journalists, the Coalition frowned at the fact that Nigeria has become a country where very bizarre and abnormal things have become not only normal, but most times, cultural.
According to the text, “we are a country where simple things are made complicated while organised crimes are clothed in official regalia, everybody moves as if nothing is happening, even when the nation is hacked. This should by all means stop!
“The Nigerian Naval Force which later became the Nigerian Navy in 1964 was established with the primary responsibility of protecting and defending Nigeria’s vast coastline and Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) which covers over 200 nautical miles from the shoreline.
“Also, sections 3 and 4(a) of the Armed Forces Act (2004) clearly defines the roles of the Armed Forces of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, and in this particular subject matter, the Nigerian Navy. Nothing in that law suggests or anticipates that the Nigerian Navy could cede or share the responsibilities of maritime security with any other agency, much less a private security company.
“Consequently, the entire pipeline surveillance contract is not only an aberration, but a conscious attempt at removing constitutional duties from the Nigerian Navy; handing immense and dangerous security powers to possible non-state actors under the guise of security companies and tantamount to paying suspected thieves to keep them from stealing.
“It is alleged that the pipeline surveillance contract costs Nigeria up to N2.5 trillion. And no review, analysis or audit have been carried out to even ascertain if this clearly unconstitutional contract is beneficial to Nigerians, or it is just a shameful way of surrendering to would-be oil thieves and pipeline vandals. This is indeed an unfortunate organised national fraud said to be packaged by some of the political and military elite as well as top NNPCL officials.
“There is no way of justifying this pipeline surveillance contract which is mainly handled by 3 known persons/interests (outside the masquerades and unseen forces behind it). The contract is a shameful surrender to non-state actors, an abuse of the military institution of the Nigerian Navy and fraudulent package to benefit a few interests at the expense of other actors and the general public.
In any case, the issue of protection of oil and gas installations and facilities, including pipelines has been settled under the Petroleum Industry Act.
“In establishing the Host Community Development Trust (HCDT) under Section 235 of the Act, responsibilities were assigned to host communities which includes the protection of oil and gas installations and facilities.
Section 257 of PIA specifically states: ‘where in a year, an act of vandalism, sabotage, or other civil unrest occurs that causes damage to the petroleum and designated facilities or disrupts production activities within the host communities, the community shall forfeit its entitlement to the extent of the cost of the damage that resulted from the activity with respect to the provisions of this Act within that financial year…”
The Coalition noted that the provision above places surveillance of any type in the hands of the host communities as a condition for receiving or losing the 3% derivation from the operating oil companies (settlor) and queried why handing trillions of naira annually to a few persons for pipeline surveillance across the Niger Delta.
“There is hardly any legal or very logical way of justifying or explaining this multi-trillion pipeline surveillance contract. It should not continue. It is a fraud and injustice against Nigeria, particularly, the vast communities of the Niger Delta who are excluded from the contract. While we are totally against fraud of any type or package, we insist that if it must continue, it should therefore be democratized.
“What is good for Gbaramatu or Ode-Itsekiri is also good for Nembe or Ikot-Abasi.
We therefore welcome the probe of this alleged scam called pipeline surveillance contract by the Senate of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. We know that the forces behind this “free money” are powerful and vested. But they cannot be more powerful that the institution of the Nigerian Senate.
“The Senate should therefore show itself as a force for accountability in Nigeria. It must not fail.
Also, we call of His Excellency, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, GCFR, President. Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of the Federal Republic of Nigeria who is also the Minister of Petroleum Resources to look into this surveillance contract which did not start in his administration.
“The contract is now being called out for being basically a fraud. It should be reviewed and possibly terminated while the Navy is allowed to continue with its constitutional duties.
Our eyes are on the Senate and we are hopeful that Mr. President will act decisively”, the text concluded.
-
Uncategorized5 years agoFG, states urged to harness flooding for ranching, others with technology – Agbaje
-
Headlines10 years agoBreaking: EFCC seals Borno House of Assembly, as Hon members take to their heels
-
News12 years agoNigeria Security Operatives Stage Manhunt For Homosexual Perpetrator
-
News9 years agoHow 21-year-old Girl fled community over accusation of lesbianism
-
News10 years agoYobe Gov Moves Against Deputy
-
Opinion7 years ago7 signs she has friend zoned you
-
Technology4 years ago
Online job placement company headhunts women
-
Headlines10 years agoBorno Dep Gov Abducts Another Church Leader
