Connect with us

News

Energy governance group faults ADC, says Tinubu’s approval of NNPC legacy balance reconciliation restores fiscal transparency, not revenue loss

Published

on

The Centre for Energy Governance and Public Finance Accountability (CEGPFA) has dismissed claims by the African Democratic Congress (ADC) that President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s approval of the reconciliation and removal of certain Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPC Ltd) legacy balances from the Federation Account was unconstitutional or financially harmful to states and local governments.

Speaking on Friday at a press conference held at the Transcorp Hilton, Abuja, the centre said the allegations ignored the historical, legal and fiscal realities surrounding the disputed balances, describing them as “unfounded” and “misleading”.

Dr Julius Osagie Eromonsele, executive director of the centre, said the balances in question were not fresh revenues generated under the current administration but long-standing legacy entries accumulated over several decades, many of which predated the Petroleum Industry Act (PIA).

“It is crucial to note that the balances in question are not recent revenues generated under the current administration. They are long-standing legacy entries accumulated over decades, many of them arising before the enactment of the Petroleum Industry Act,” Eromonsele said.

He explained that the disputed figures stemmed from unresolved production sharing contract disputes, domestic crude supply obligations under the former fuel subsidy regime, royalty assessment disagreements and reconciliation gaps between NNPC, regulators and revenue agencies.

According to him, these balances had remained on the Federation Account books for years despite repeated audits that questioned their accuracy, legal enforceability and collectability, creating a distorted picture of public finances across all tiers of government.

Countering claims that the balances were arbitrarily written off by presidential fiat, Eromonsele said the approval followed a formal reconciliation process involving relevant fiscal and regulatory institutions, with presentations made to the Federation Account Allocation Committee (FAAC).

“Official records show that approximately $1.42 billion and N5.57 trillion were removed from the Federation Account books after reconciliation established that these figures were either duplicated, overstated, unsupported by verifiable documentation, or no longer legally recoverable,” he said.

He stressed that the directive applied strictly to legacy balances accumulated up to December 31, 2024, adding that reconciliation should not be confused with the cancellation of valid revenue.

“Reconciliation is a recognised public finance practice. It is not the same as cancelling valid revenues. Rather, it is the process of aligning records to reflect economic and legal reality,” Eromonsele said.

He also clarified that no cash was removed from the Federation Account and that no allocations to states or local governments were reversed.

“The funds in question were not sitting as cash in the Federation Account. What occurred was the correction of inherited accounting distortions that had long outlived their practical relevance,” he added.

Addressing constitutional concerns raised by the ADC, the centre said Section 162 of the Constitution applies only to revenues that are lawfully due and payable, not to disputed or extinguished claims.

“Public finance administration requires constant reconciliation to ensure that only valid, auditable and legally enforceable revenues are presented for distribution,” Eromonsele said.

He argued that sustaining false receivables undermines budgeting, fiscal discipline and revenue predictability for subnational governments, noting that credible and realistic revenue flows are more beneficial than inflated figures that never materialise.

The centre said the reconciliation aligns with reforms introduced by the PIA, which repositioned NNPC Ltd as a commercial entity operating under international accounting standards.

Concluding, the centre commended President Tinubu for approving what it described as a difficult but necessary decision.

“Writing off long-standing, unverifiable legacy balances required political will and a commitment to fiscal honesty over convenience. It sends a clear signal that Nigeria is prepared to confront the structural weaknesses of its energy revenue system rather than perpetuate them,” Eromonsele said.

He urged politicians and stakeholders to approach the issue responsibly and support reforms that strengthen transparency and accountability in Nigeria’s public finance system.

Full speech attached

BEING FULL TEXT AT A PRESS CONFERENCE ORGANISED BY THE CENTRE FOR ENERGY GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC FINANCE ACCOUNTABILITY ON THE RECONCILIATION OF NNPC LTD LEGACY BALANCES AND THE FEDERATION ACCOUNT HELD AT TRANSCORP HILTON, ABUJA, ON FRIDAY, JANUARY 10, 2025

Ladies and gentlemen of the press, distinguished stakeholders, and fellow Nigerians, the Centre for Energy Governance and Public Finance Accountability has convened this important press conference to respond to unfounded claims by the African Democratic Congress (ADC) concerning President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s approval of the reconciliation and removal of certain legacy balances attributed to the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPC Ltd) from the Federation Account.

The debate has been framed as a constitutional crisis and a deliberate deprivation of revenue due to states and local governments. Given the gravity of such allegations, it is important to ground this conversation in facts, law, and the historical context of Nigeria’s petroleum revenue administration.

BACKGROUND

It is crucial to note that the balances in question are not recent revenues generated under the current administration. They are long-standing legacy entries accumulated over decades, many of them arising before the enactment of the Petroleum Industry Act (PIA). These entries stem from unresolved production sharing contract disputes, domestic crude supply obligations under the fuel subsidy regime, royalty assessment disagreements, and persistent reconciliation gaps between NNPC, regulators, and revenue agencies.

For years, these balances remained on the Federation Account books despite repeated audits and reviews that questioned their accuracy, legal enforceability, and collectability. Treating such disputed figures as assured income created a distorted picture of public finances and fostered unrealistic revenue expectations across all tiers of government.

WHAT THE PRESIDENTIAL APPROVAL ACTUALLY MEANS

Contrary to claims of an arbitrary executive write-off, the President’s approval followed a formal reconciliation process involving relevant fiscal and regulatory institutions, including presentations made to the Federation Account Allocation Committee (FAAC).

Official records show that approximately $1.42 billion and N5.57 trillion were removed from the Federation Account books after reconciliation established that these figures were either duplicated, overstated, unsupported by verifiable documentation, or no longer legally recoverable. The directive applied strictly to legacy balances accumulated up to December 31, 2024.

Reconciliation is a recognised public finance practice. It is not the same as cancelling valid revenues. Rather, it is the process of aligning records to reflect economic and legal reality. Revenues that are not collectible cannot be distributed, and carrying them indefinitely on public accounts does not create wealth—it merely postpones fiscal clarity.

It is also critical to note that the funds in question were not sitting as cash in the Federation Account. No existing allocations to states or local governments were reversed or withdrawn. What occurred was the correction of inherited accounting distortions that had long outlived their practical relevance.

CONSTITUTIONAL AND FISCAL IMPLICATIONS

The ADC has cited Section 162 of the Constitution to argue that the President lacks authority to approve the removal of these balances. However, Section 162 applies to revenues that are lawfully due and payable to the Federation. It does not compel the perpetuation of disputed or legally extinguished claims as revenue.

Public finance administration requires constant reconciliation to ensure that only valid, auditable, and legally enforceable revenues are presented for distribution. Without this, the Federation Account would become a repository for accounting fiction rather than a transparent reflection of national income.

Furthermore, the Federation Account is administered collectively through FAAC, which includes representatives of the federal, state, and local governments. The reconciliation process was not unilateral, secretive, or detached from institutional oversight.

From a fiscal standpoint, sustaining false receivables undermines planning, budgeting, and fiscal discipline. States and local governments are better served by predictable, credible revenue flows than by inflated figures that repeatedly fail verification and never materialise in cash form.

This reconciliation also aligns with the reforms introduced by the Petroleum Industry Act, which repositioned NNPC Ltd as a commercial entity subject to international accounting standards. Legacy balances accumulated under a fundamentally different governance structure cannot be allowed to distort the post-PIA fiscal framework indefinitely.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the Centre for Energy Governance and Public Finance Accountability affirms that the reconciliation and removal of NNPC Ltd’s legacy balances from the Federation Account does not constitute a constitutional violation, nor does it deprive states and local governments of legitimate revenue.

Rather, it represents a necessary and responsible step toward restoring transparency, credibility, and realism to Nigeria’s public finance system—particularly in the oil and gas sector, which has long suffered from opaque accounting and inherited distortions.

The Centre acknowledges and commends President Bola Ahmed Tinubu for approving this difficult but necessary decision. Writing off long-standing, unverifiable legacy balances required political will and a commitment to fiscal honesty over convenience. It sends a clear signal that Nigeria is prepared to confront the structural weaknesses of its energy revenue system rather than perpetuate them.

True fiscal federalism cannot be built on numbers that exist only on paper. It must rest on transparent accounts, enforceable obligations, and a shared commitment to accuracy and accountability.

We urge all politicians and stakeholders to approach this issue with responsibility and restraint, and to support reforms that strengthen, not weaken, the integrity of Nigeria’s public finances.

Thank you.

[Questions]

Signed:

Dr Julius Osagie Eromonsele

Executive Director,
Centre for Energy Governance and Public Finance Accountability

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Benue Gov Lauds CHEC’s Progress on Strategic Road Project

Published

on

By

The Benue State Government has praised China Harbour Engineering Company Limited (CHEC) for the steady progress and quality of work on the dualization of the Makurdi-Otukpo-Enugu road project, which it described as a critical economic artery for the Idoma Nation and a major north-south transport corridor.Deputy Governor Sam Ode made the commendation during an inspection of the project at the Otukpo corridor, describing CHEC as a “reputable frontline construction firm”. He praised President Bola Ahmed Tinubu and Minister of Works, Engr. David Umahi, for sustaining the project, which is Phase II of the Keffi-Akwanga-Lafia-Makurdi-9th Mile expressway dualization.He said the state government has paid over ₦4.6 billion in compensation to affected communities, covering demolished structures and relocation of public utilities from Wurukum Roundabout in Makurdi to Orokam, the border with Enugu State. “In Otukpo township, we made a special appeal because our people have suffered for years due to the abandoned road. The Minister of Works graciously directed CHEC to prioritise this section, and we have been assured that the Otukpo stretch will be delivered before June this year,” Ode said.Federal Controller of Works, Engineer Munkaila Danladi, said 120km of the 250km road has been completed up to binder course level, with 50km reaching the wearing course stage. Ongoing work includes earthworks, construction of hydraulic structures, and a flyover bridge at Chainage 00. “We assure that by June this year, we should be able to complete the dual carriageway for the Otukpo corridor,” Danladi said.The project is jointly financed by China EXIM Bank and the federal government, expected to boost agricultural trade, reduce travel time, and enhance socio-economic activities in Benue State and neighbouring regions

Continue Reading

News

CSO Backs Impeachment Bid Against Fubara Over Budget Snub, Legislative Disregard

Published

on

By

A civil society organisation, the National Vanguard for Democratic Coalition (NVDC), has thrown its weight behind the renewed impeachment move against Rivers State Governor Siminalayi Fubara, urging the State House of Assembly to exhaust all constitutional options to address what it described as the governor’s persistent disregard for the rule of law.

The group’s Coordinator, Mr. Felix White, made the call in a statement on Saturday, warning that any attempt by the Assembly to abandon the impeachment process would amount to a betrayal of democratic principles.

White said this marks the third impeachment attempt against Governor Fubara since he assumed office in 2023, a development he said reflects deepening concerns about the governor’s relationship with the legislature.

He accused the governor of allegedly fuelling the ongoing political crisis in the state through actions he said undermine constitutional order and separation of powers.

According to the CSO, Rivers residents are bearing the brunt of the prolonged political standoff, stressing that peace can only return if the governor adheres strictly to constitutional procedures in his dealings with the House of Assembly.

At the centre of the controversy is Governor Fubara’s alleged failure to present the 2026 Appropriation Bill to the Assembly, which the group described as unprecedented among serving governors in the country.

White said the alleged refusal to submit the budget and to recognise the Assembly as an independent arm of government constitute acts capable of being interpreted as gross misconduct under Section 188 of the 1999 Constitution, which provides the legal framework for impeaching a sitting governor.

He further alleged that the governor had failed to meet certain statutory obligations owed to the legislature, describing the actions as a direct affront to democratic governance.

The group urged the Rivers State House of Assembly not to back down from the impeachment process if the governor fails to correct the alleged infractions, insisting that accountability must be enforced to safeguard democracy in the state.

White concluded that the “honourable option” for the governor, should he be unwilling to comply with constitutional provisions, is to step aside to allow for stability and proper governance in Rivers State.

Continue Reading

News

APC South-South Says Rivers Assembly Impeachment Plot is Retaliation Against Fubara for Rejecting Fictitious Projects in 2026 Budget

Published

on

By

The All Progressives Congress (APC) South-South Group has accused Rivers Assembly lawmakers loyal to FCT Minister Nyesom Wike of instigating impeachment threats against Governor Siminalayi Fubara after he refused to approve fictitious projects in the state’s 2026 budget proposal.

The group made the allegation on Friday in Port Harcourt while responding to claims by members of the Rivers State House of Assembly that Fubara breached the peace agreement brokered by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu to end the protracted political crisis in the state.

Addressing journalists, Comrade Freedom Amadi, coordinator of the APC South-South Group, said the impeachment move was not rooted in any violation of the peace accord but was a calculated retaliation against the governor for resisting pressure to inflate the budget with questionable line items.

“What is unfolding in Rivers State is not a constitutional dispute but a deliberate attempt to punish a sitting governor for refusing to mortgage public finances for private political interests. Governor Siminalayi Fubara did not breach the President’s peace accord; rather, he refused to add fictitious projects to the Rivers State budget, and that refusal is now being weaponised against him,” Amadi said.

Members of the Rivers assembly had accused the governor of acting in bad faith and undermining the Tinubu-brokered deal, arguing that his conduct justified impeachment proceedings. Some lawmakers also claimed that presidential intervention could not stop the legislature from carrying out its planned impeachment of the governor.

The APC South-South rejected that position, warning that such statements amounted to open defiance of presidential authority and posed a threat to democratic stability.

“When legislators publicly declare that not even the President can restrain them, they are not asserting independence; they are advertising institutional insubordination. President Tinubu intervened in Rivers State as the elected President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, not as a partisan actor, and his peace initiative is not optional or disposable,” Amadi declared.

According to the group, the peace deal was intended to restore stability and allow governance to proceed without coercion, not to subject the governor to political control through the legislature.

“The agreement brokered by Mr President was about restoring calm and respecting constitutional roles, not about handing Rivers State over to political enforcers. Any attempt to twist that agreement into a tool for intimidation or impeachment is a distortion of its spirit and intent,” he announced.

The APC South-South also pointed to the central role of Wike, arguing that lawmakers driving the impeachment process were acting in alignment with the former Rivers governor, now minister of the Federal Capital Territory.

“It is impossible to separate the current impeachment threats from the political influence of Minister Nyesom Wike. The lawmakers pushing this agenda are his loyalists, and their actions reflect a coordinated effort to retain control of Rivers politics through legislative intimidation,” he said.

The group noted that Wike’s continued silence, despite serving in an APC-led federal government, raised serious questions about loyalty to the President who appointed him.

“President Tinubu extended trust and political goodwill by appointing a PDP member into his cabinet in the interest of national unity. That trust is being abused if a serving minister allows his loyalists to openly undermine a presidential peace initiative. You cannot sabotage peace and still claim allegiance to the authority that brokered it,” Amadi noted.

The APC South-South warned that using impeachment to settle political scores would erode public confidence in democratic institutions and weaken legislative credibility.

“Impeachment is a grave constitutional mechanism, not a political cudgel. What we are witnessing in Rivers State is not oversight but vendetta, not accountability but retaliation against a governor who chose fiscal responsibility over political obedience.”

The pro-APC group called on the Rivers State House of Assembly to suspend all impeachment actions and urged the National Assembly to intervene to prevent what it described as legislative excesses.

“Legislative impunity in one state endangers democratic order across the federation. Rivers State does not belong to any individual or faction, and its budget is not a private ledger for political godfathers,” the group maintained.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2017 Zox News Theme. Theme by MVP Themes, powered by WordPress.